Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter Worthington

GET UPDATES FROM Peter Worthington
 

McGuinty's Tax Rebate For Immigrants: Divisive, Not Affirmative, Action

Posted: 09/12/11 12:24 PM ET

A disquieting thing about affirmative action programs is that they can stigmatize the recipient as well as benefit him (or her) and create unnecessary (and unintended) resentments and unfairness.

Reducing standards in order to help visible minorities can discriminate against others who meet or exceed these standards.

Worse, affirmative action programs can inadvertently persuade a potential employer that someone who is a visible minority with superior qualifications got where he did by preferential treatment. Prejudice may prevent someone being hired.

In a move that reeks of desperation politics, Liberal leader Dalton McGuinty wants to introduce a $10,000 tax rebate to any business that hires newcomers, but ignores those who were born here and need a job and those who came to Canada in the past and no longer qualify as newcomers.

The plan seems a grotesque distortion of affirmative action.

What it seems to mean is that if a company gets a $10,000 tax rebate for hiring a rookie citizen, other established citizens who are unemployed don't get hired. That alone seems a mockery of McGuinty's rather silly sentence that "a Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian."

What the proposal means is that some Canadians are more equal than other Canadians; "new" Canadians are preferred to "old" Canadians.

If you think about it, the plan is unfair to the 500,000 people in Ontario who are unemployed and looking for work.

Those who should be most annoyed are those who emigrated to Canada over the years, and are having problems now that times are tough. They are getting no favours, while newcomers will be hired by companies that understandably will want a tax rebate.

It's a bit like the resentment legal immigrants may have towards illegal immigrants who come here and go on welfare, get accommodation, medical treatment, exploit the system and give immigrants a bad name.

Those who enter Canada legally often have a more difficult time than those who cheat to get in, then claim refugee status.

McGuintys' tax rebate scheme has the potential of doing for him in the Oct. 6 provincial election what public funding for religious schools did for John Tory when he led the Conservative party in the last election -- turned possible victory into guaranteed defeat.

Granted the Liberals seem to have closed the gap in opinion polls. The Tories of Tim Hudak face a tougher fight than a coronation. But there's a feeling of desperation among Liberals that isn't evident among Tories.

One sign of Liberal panic (or is it hysteria? Or both?) is the charge that those who favour Conservatives are akin to the Tea Party in the U.S.

This is silly -- but also reflective on Liberal incumbents who fear for their future as well-paid MPPs. The great majority of Tea Partiers in the U.S. are middle-class Americans, distressed at the loss of jobs, the economic plight of their country, the failure of the administration to encourage confidence and optimism.

Sure, there are Tea Party nutbars, but they're an irrelevant minority.

Perhaps Dalton McGuinty will re-think the $10,000 tax rebate. If not, then he deserves to live to regret it, because thinking people (some of whom are voters) see it as a dumb and divisive idea.

 
A disquieting thing about affirmative action programs is that they can stigmatize the recipient as well as benefit him (or her) and create unnecessary (and unintended) resentments and unfairness. Red...
A disquieting thing about affirmative action programs is that they can stigmatize the recipient as well as benefit him (or her) and create unnecessary (and unintended) resentments and unfairness. Red...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:05 PM on 09/12/2011
what you mean is the liberals beat you to the immigrant vote ---they saw what harper did and were/are not asleep at the wheel -------tax credits to employers to entice them to hire new citizens -----is not a lot different than ---special assistance for new citizens to speed up more family member entrance to canada .
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
03:59 PM on 09/12/2011
What a disingenuous article typical of Worthington. This is a $12 million dollar program aimed not at the unemployed, but the accredited professional unemployed. Again I ask what is Worthington doing on these pages. You will not see David Suzuki or any progressive get a single coloum inch in the SUN. Kinesella does not count, he is just a sausage maker
10:08 PM on 09/12/2011
he is related to the editor --who is david frums wife ---in a word ---nepotism
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KenKo
02:52 PM on 09/12/2011
Peter, I usually give respect to your viewpoints because of the principles of logic you employ. On this occasion, I would wish that you put less emphasis on exaggeration and stop stoking unfounded paranoia and just focus on the merits of the actual proposal. Ontario's proposal is for specific professions like doctors, engineers etc. I hardly think all the unemployed citizens in the province fall into all those occupations and certainly not 500,000! Or do you think a sales clerk or high school graduate also qualify to be a doctor? The actual target is a small fraction, and the professions selected are mainly those we have difficulty in filling already vacant positions in the first place. Between current and expected vacancies for positions with high qualifications on the one hand, and an abundance of legal immigrants who are plying their livelihoods as taxi drivers and pizza deliverers instead of their professions of training, which do you think is the more economically beneficial of the two? I would agree that we should debate on whether the $10K tax incentive could actually do the trick in terms of effectiveness of outcome, which is where the debate should be, rather than on whether many of the 500,000 unemployed are effectively discriminated against in filling these positions. So come on, Peter, you can do better than this! You are letting your partisan prejudice get in the way of sound analytical writing.
10:07 PM on 09/12/2011
he has never been a non partisan given to sound analytical writing ---he's a rightie,, way out there .