Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Phil Flemming

GET UPDATES FROM Phil Flemming
 

The Ugly Truth About Bill C-377

Posted: 02/07/2013 3:06 pm

The recent post written by the President of Merit Canada, Terrance Oakey, is just more rhetoric coming from the biggest proponent of Private Members Bill C-377. Throughout the procedural process of the Bill, Merit Canada, an anti-union contractor-based organization, has been lobbying the Conservative government quite regularly, including 12 meetings with MP Russ Hiebert, five meetings with Finance Canada, and another 12 meetings with the Prime Minister's Office, a record that those opposed to the Bill have been unable to match. A quick search of Communication Reports on the website of the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying, confirms just how often Merit President Terrance Oakey met with the above groups and people. It seems very hypocritical of Mr. Oakey to question union members for lobbying the government, while he has been making a living doing the exact same thing.

While we are on the subject of transparency, it is interesting to point out that while the President of Merit Canada is representing an organization involved in the construction industry, his background is far from that industry all together. He has served as a Conservative Party staffer for several years, and worked in various positions as a Lobbyist on Parliament Hill. Could it be that it was in part because of this experience that Bill C-377 came to be -- and not out of a desire to help middle-class working men and women of Canada?

There are some other key points that should also be brought to light for Canadians.

Merit Canada is an anti-union group consisting of about 3,500 small and mid-size contractors who employ about 60,000 workers in eight provinces in Canada. Unionized work forces are their direct competition. So don't they stand to benefit from the government forcing unionized work forces to open their books for everyone to scrutinize under the guise of transparency? More specifically, Merit's competition is the Canadian Building Trades, who have approximately 450,000 members employed by various contractors across Canada. Under this new law Merit contractors will be able to specifically see the financial details and inner workings of their unionized competition. The competitive advantaged gained by Merit Canada is like a game of poker in which the unions are forced to play with their cards dealt face up.

The wild claim by the President of Merit Canada that "These funds are funneled into a wide range of causes" is very misleading. Union members decide how their dues are spent democratically at regular union meetings by a vote for or against the motion.

Suggesting other jurisdictions in the world have a form of similar legislation is not entirely accurate. The writer failed to mention that those jurisdictions also have reporting obligations for employers and employer organizations, such as Merit. Bill C-377 does not include those same reporting obligations, so that counter-balance is conveniently missing in the Canadian legislation. Only unions and union members will be affected. Liberal MP Rodger Cuzner, Cape Breton-Canso, put forth an amendment that would require all not-for-profit organizations and contractor organizations, like Merit Canada, to file the same documents and have them posted publicly on the Internet; however that amendment was handily defeated by Conservative Party MPs.

Canadians should be made aware that Bill C-377 is a competition issue, not a national public policy issue. Canadian tax payers will be footing the bill for the design, start-up, maintenance, and monitoring costs that the CRA will incur for this reporting. The Canadian Labour Congress has estimated that setting up this system will cost Canadian taxpayers between $32-million & $45-million dollars per year. And for whose benefit?

Loading Slideshow...

 
FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
The recent post written by the President of Merit Canada, Terrance Oakey, is just more rhetoric coming from the biggest proponent of Private Members Bill C-377. Throughout the procedural process of th...
The recent post written by the President of Merit Canada, Terrance Oakey, is just more rhetoric coming from the biggest proponent of Private Members Bill C-377. Throughout the procedural process of th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sdgreen
10:39 PM on 02/07/2013
Frankly anything to termination Labour Unions is a good thing. Unions are nothing more than parasites against the worker class. Governments should just create better Employment Standards that cover matters of employment, including wages and benefits along with grievance procedures. This would negate the need for the useless Labour Union industry and their propensity to feed off of workers through union dues.

We need a right to work legislation accompanied by a solid Employment Standards Charter. Labour Unions fear this as this would put them out of a lucrative business.
01:24 PM on 02/08/2013
You have an incredibly distorted view of the world my friend. Unions as parasites against the working class? Far from it. Corporations are far more parasitcal, all their profits (which executives suck away in the form of salaries, bonuses, and lucrative severance packages) are earned by the labour of the working class, who do not share equally in what that labour obtains for corporations. Unions speak out and work on behalf of the working class; businesses and government certainly don't. Who do you think is responsible for the employment standards legislation we have in this country - benevolent governments and employers? Hardly. Unions, who have been fighting in this country for years - fair wages, limits on hours of work, overtime pay, vacation leave - all the benefits found in employment standards legislation owe their existence to the presence of unions in this country. Those benefits will start to disappear if unions are not there to help ensure that they remain. Without unions, workers are vulnerable to employers - employers have a lot of power, and unions are a check on that power. When employers treat their workers well and pay them fairly, you don't usually find unions, so if employers want to rid themselves of unions, all they have to do is treat workers well and willingly provide to their workers what unions have had to fight for.
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
03:20 PM on 02/08/2013
Unions are broken, and rightly so, because corporations are broken.

A corporations obligation, under law, is to protect the interest of its shareholders. This often means terminating dozens, hundreds and even thousands of middle class workers, not to avoid a loss, simply to meet quarterly projections. They are legally obligated to put their employees last.

Unions are the complete opposite, they're required by law to protect the interest of their workers, even the horrible ones we all know should be canned, but even if they agree with the employer that the worker should be fired, they're still legally obligated to defend him.

See the problem here ? One is broken in one direction and the other is broken in the opposite direction. The only real solution I can think of is to rewrite corporate charters to legally obligate corporations to BALANCE the need of their investors, employees and clients.
07:37 PM on 02/07/2013
There is very little doubt that this is just an underhanded way by the government to destoy unions what I would tell all unions is to change to associations, due what the rich boys do drop unions move to associations and watch the government run away.
06:23 PM on 02/07/2013
so the money shifts from the gun registry to the union busting registry