Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
GET UPDATES FROM Raffi Cavoukian
 

Advice to Harper

Posted: 05/30/11 10:00 AM ET

Prime Minister Harper,

Your first parliamentary majority comes at a time of considerable change in Canadian political culture, liberty movements in many nations and a systemic crisis in the global ecology. It's worth noting that the Conservative party's founding principles include a commitment to upholding our "obligations among the nations of the world," with references to fair trade and future generations, and to "integrity, honesty and concern for the best interests of all."

That, then, should commit you to transparency, civility and co-operation. In this spirit -- and for your legacy -- please consider the following:

- Apologize to Canadians for being in contempt of the House -- the true reason your minority government was brought down, and a rightful concern for Canadians, which you've dismissed as mere "bickering." Have the humility and courage to say, "I'm sorry."

- Stun the country with massive support for clean renewable energies to make the Tar Sands a footnote in the sad history of polluting industries. Make Canada a world leader in the clean jobs sector.

- Respect the clear and compelling climate science that should put Canada in the forefront of climate action. Support "the right to a future" for all Canadian kids.

- Reduce crime by investing in early years and increasing literacy, not by ineffective and costly prisons.

- Show your respect for Canada's children by legislating a ban on direct advertising and marketing to kids 12 and under.

Show us you're truly committed to balancing "fiscal accountability, progressive social policy and individual rights and responsibilities" and want to "build a national coalition of people who share these beliefs" as the Conservative Party's founding principles state.

Canadians want to believe their Prime Minister. We all expect you to set a good example, especially our children and youth.

Raffi Cavoukian, C.M., O.B.C., is a singer, author, children's champion, and ecology advocate, founder of Centre for Child Honouring on Salt Spring Island, BC, Canada. Among his awards are the Order of Canada, the Order of BC, the UN's Earth Achievement Award, the Global 500 Roll, and three honorary degrees. Raffi is a member of the Club of Budapest, and he blogs for Huffington Post and similar online news sources.

 
 
 

Follow Raffi Cavoukian on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Raffi_RC

Prime Minister Harper, Your first parliamentary majority comes at a time of considerable change in Canadian political culture, liberty movements in many nations and a systemic crisis in the global e...
Prime Minister Harper, Your first parliamentary majority comes at a time of considerable change in Canadian political culture, liberty movements in many nations and a systemic crisis in the global e...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 42
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:40 PM on 05/31/2011
This post reminds of a song.
"Wlilabee Wallabee Waffi. An elephant sat on Raffi."

I will leave it at that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kvass
12:55 AM on 05/31/2011
This Raffi chap sounds sincere but does he really know what he is suggesting. Asking Harpo to show humility sounds wonderful if not slightly bizarre. For him to forsake the tar sands would be kicking his Alberta(americans) constituents in the teeth
01:28 PM on 05/31/2011
Absolutely, not too likely that's going to happen. But nevertheless important to keep our eye on the ball...to point out what is going on and to remember what we want. And so I think Raffi's idealistic "Dear Stephen" letter has value.
10:01 PM on 05/30/2011
Raffi for PM!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cariboofly
Aye, Ready, Aye & Semper Fi
09:37 PM on 05/30/2011
"Contempt" of the Canadian people has NEVER been "alright", no matter who is/was guilty. However, I think the judgment should be left up to the people themselves, not a group of opposition MPs coordinated to cause an election.
And apparently, over the past 5 years, the LPC has been found "in contempt", by Canadians.
06:35 AM on 05/31/2011
The "people themselves" didn't give Harper a majority. And these "opposition MPs" are our elected representatives charged with protecting our interests in parliament.
Try again.
05:25 PM on 05/31/2011
Well, who did then? Santa Claus? Oh, but the "opposition MPs" did get elected. Strange little electoral world you live in there, mooshie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WernerPatels
Writer, pundit, translator
07:28 PM on 05/30/2011
Good advice for Harper. He'd better heed it.
06:13 PM on 05/30/2011
Well said Raffi!

Harper was found in contempt. The rules of parliament were followed in that finding.

Not only that, but the man lied to the entire nation during the leader's debates when he said that there are no corporate tax cuts. Later that night on The National, Amanda Lang put it more euphemistically when she said his position on the corporate tax cuts didn't "add up", and then outlined the cuts that have happened as well as those that he has in the works for the future. Canadians who support elected officials lying to them have a strange idea of democracy.

Would it be childish for Mr. Harper to apologize? No, it would be mature to apologize. In the long term it would also be a politically wise thing to do.

Is it childish to ask for an apology? Not at all. Before he can regain the respect of Canadians he must acknowledge his betrayal of our trust. Asking for an apology is extending an olive branch to the man. The big news would be if he accepted it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:05 PM on 05/30/2011
Going back on one's campaign promises is nothing new. The worst example I know of was Trudeau over wage and price controls ("Zap! You're frozen!"). That lie by Trudeau may have cost Stanfield the election.

Don't ever recall an apology over that.
07:51 PM on 05/30/2011
This was not a failure to fulfill a campaign promise, this was a lie about the present state of affairs and plans for the future. And yes other politicians have been egregiously contemptuous of Canadians. Does that make it OK? Do your duty, hold him accountable regardless of your political affiliation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:14 PM on 05/30/2011
"Harper was found in contempt. The rules of parliament were followed in that finding. "

And so the opposing parties forced an election over it, and they lost. It appears that much of the Canadian populace were not impressed by this finding of contempt, where most of the "jury" were opposition MPs. Really, get over it.
07:51 PM on 05/30/2011
See above
06:43 AM on 05/31/2011
This is fascinating morality: some kind of utilitarian-machiavellian thing in which it's alright for a politician to lie and break the law as long as he wins the next election.
How would you feel if this weren't your guy but the other guy breaking the rules? Still alright? Not so much. You can't even handle it when the other guy plays by the rules and stops your guy.
04:55 PM on 05/30/2011
To all you Conservatives that trivialize the contempt of Parliament charge as being a partisan trick used by the opposition to bring down the government, please go read some history books and stop plastering this falsehood on this site and others. The Harper Government was warned twice by the Speaker that they would be found in contempt if they refused to disclose information such as the actual cost of the new jets. Harper and his cronies ignored the warnings and continued to operate in secret.

The Speaker found the Conservatives in contempt when they refused to provide information a third time. This was the FIRST time this has happened in the history of the Commonwealth. If this was a tactic that was readily available to any opposition leaders do you not seriously think it would have been used as an effective ploy to bring down many a minority government in England, Canada, Australia and so on for hundreds of years? No, of course not because it is a very serious charge but the Conjobs managed to sell a bunch of extremely ignorant voters that it was "bickering".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tokenblackman
02:52 PM on 05/30/2011
Ha Ha, Like Harper is going say sorry or respect climate change science, anything to keep the oil companies with the maximum profits possible.
01:54 PM on 05/30/2011
The "Tar Sands" provide jobs and energy for Canadians. If we were not to utilize them, then where to you imagine our energy needs are going to be met? By a couple of solar and wind farms? Because that is laughable. Hydro dams leave huge footprints as well, disrupting fish migration and flooding forests. Extracting oil, no matter where on Earth, is rarely a clean job, but I for one I more fearful of offshore after BP-Horizon, and importing oil from countries with little or no regulation. There are standards to which companies operating in northern Alberta must adhere to, and there have been technological advances improving the footprint left by extraction. Google SAGD (Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage) for one and discover that there are responsible ways to get at our resources. I know I must sound like I'm a big oil advocate, but really I see our "oil sands" (as they are actually called) a lesser of many evils.

ps.
Pouting about recieving an apology from the government just sounds childish. No one ever agrees with all that goes on in Ottawa, but you gotta move on if you ever want to move forward.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
02:28 PM on 05/30/2011
Here here! Our tar sands are the greatest economic prize in all of history, we owe it to future generations of Canadians to keep Canada prosperous!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canadagirl76
A mind is like a parachute, they work best open.
10:55 AM on 05/31/2011
what future? have you see the land around the tarsands? it is disgusting. I guess as long as someone is making a buck then it isn't important.
10:52 PM on 05/30/2011
The encapsulation and burial of large deposits of organic matter is one of the mechanisms that the world biosphere uses to prevent runaway temperature increase in the atmosphere. It also sequesters a variety of heavy metal toxins which are released into the ground water during oil recovery. As to the perceived energy shortage, recent discoveries of natural gas suggest that this has been exagerated. Interestingly enough it now appears that the oil sands pollution footprint is another example of Consevative lies and coverups.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:17 PM on 05/30/2011
I appreciate Raffi's comments but offer my own by saying the "tar sands" provide a massive amount of tax revenue through equalization that benefits all Canadians. I think intelligent environmental regulation along with carbon capture will go a long way to improving not only the environment around the Ft. McMurray, but will also improve our standing worldwide.
I would also ask that Raffi look in his own back yard and comment on how the City of Victoria treats (or doesn't treat) wastewater that it pumps into the ocean.
12:18 PM on 05/31/2011
Actually the tar sands and many other businesses in Canada are the beneficiaries of huge incentives and subsidies, which, yes, help them to create jobs (and make money for their shareholders).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
waynerism
12:02 PM on 05/30/2011
Raffi - I am quite certain that you mean well however - you are suffering from serious error in your analysis. It is quite understandable as your political bias is quite apparent - however - there was no ' Contempt of Parliament ' committed by the Prime Minister - now I know that you honestly believe what you propose but this is a mistake. The Prime Minister as asked by the other parties to produce documents related to the file in question. This was done by Harper all documents were released that were asked for according to current criteria . .. it was the oppostion parties that collectively decided that even though all protocols were followed relating to the disclosure it was insufficient to them - therefeore - the opposition parties decided that it was ' politically expedient ' to use this to bring the contempt charge forward rather than bring down the gov't on the budget - If you go back and review the speakers ruling you will see that I am correct - in otherwords Raffi your so called contempt charge really displays nothing more than the contempt by the other leaders who decided to use this charge as a political ploy and quite frankly I find this far more comtemptible than anything the PM did - and I would add that apparently most canadians also saw through the obvious manouver and re-elected the CPC - so I think that what really is the issue here is your
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:44 PM on 05/30/2011
Another conbot apologist deluded in thinking 39% of the population is "...most canadians..."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
waynerism
02:59 PM on 05/30/2011
indeed it was most - you see here is how our system works - you get more bums in seats and can then outvote all of the others combined means you win a majority - this is democracy - now I know this frustrates you and you want to rend your garments, ashen your hair and scream ulululu! however tis to no avail Raffi ! you and yours are much like the noise made after eating pork and beans - a mild inconvenience at best and rather socially revolting but none the less just a noise in the wind accompanied by a temporary odour we conbots have to be patient with. PS: insulting a group of voters is rarely a good or workable strategy if you want anyone outside the small group of like minded friends, who probably still live in their mothers basement - to agree with you however we Tories make allowances for people like you - have a good day!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cariboofly
Aye, Ready, Aye & Semper Fi
10:59 AM on 05/30/2011
Should it not first be recognized that the whole "Contempt of Parliament" thing has been very similar to past Liberal government action or inaction ? The only difference, of course, was that the contemptuous Liberals had majorities under Chretien and Trudeau.
Should it not also be remembered that a very short time ago(December 2010) the opposition parties in the House of Commons made a commitment to bring down the government by any means possible ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jack Hope
Occasionally quoted by Mainstream Media
02:44 PM on 05/30/2011
The other did it too! That makes it okay!

I think a lot of Canadians are getting genuinely sick of this attitude. I know I am.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donttwit
11:08 PM on 05/30/2011
Oh yes. Almost forgot. Two wrongs make a right???

Fallacy of logic.