Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Conrad Black
Romeo Saganash

GET UPDATES FROM Romeo Saganash
 

Protecting Families From a Conservative Agenda

Posted: 01/ 5/2012 5:44 pm

For many Canadians, the holiday season is a time for friends and family. Being together reminds us of our priorities and for most parents our kids are at the top of that list. We want the best for them and will do whatever we can to help them achieve their dreams.

Sadly, for many parents across Canada that job is getting tougher, as making ends meet is growing increasingly difficult. Full-time jobs are harder to find, wages are falling against inflation, and the number of working poor families continues to grow along with food bank use.

To aggravate matters further, the current Conservative government has seen fit to offer breaks only to the wealthy, exacerbating the growing gap between the rich and the rest of us.

Families need help getting childcare, but instead of creating new affordable spaces, the Conservatives offer a tax break that doesn't cover the cost of a week's care for a single child.

For families in Ontario and British Columbia, they raise the cost of hydro, gasoline, heating fuel and other essentials by five per cent through implementation of the HST.

The Conservative economic strategy is to provide tax cuts to corporations like Electro-Motive in London, Ont. and then do nothing when that company locks out employees in order to extort a 55 per cent wage cut.

This Conservative government continues to make decisions that make it harder on Canadian families.

But we can fight back.

Creating an affordable national daycare system would be a great first step. This would save families money on childcare. It would provide parents who want to work with the opportunity to earn more income. And because more people would be able to work and pay taxes who would otherwise be trapped on social assistance, governments can save those costs. Quebec has shown us how to run a successful and affordable system, offering a template that can be modified to work across the country.

Canada needs business to work in the best interest of the communities in which they operate and we need to reward those that do so, instead of rewarding those who take and give nothing back. We have seen the result of blanket corporate tax cuts: factories and mills shut down, raw materials shipped out of the country, good jobs lost, environmental degradation. Instead, we need to create a sustainable economy and stop the race to the bottom.

I believe we need to rationalize our tax system so that it returns to the principles it was meant to serve. We can hold personal tax rates steady and raise the minimum standard deduction to a living income, helping everyone meet their basic needs. We can pay for that by eliminating corporate incentives that don't incentivize, specialized credits that only serve to shift the burden from the wealthy to the middle class, privileged deductions like the one for executive stock options that serve those who don't need it, and all of those loopholes that cheat honest, law-abiding Canadians of a fair tax system.

We can help the vast majority of Canadians simply by getting rid of misguided attempts at social engineering that only ended up allowing those who can afford to pay an accounting firm to evade their responsibilities.

We can protect existing jobs and create new jobs. We can work with corporations, labour, and the public to ensure that local communities get real benefit guarantees from economic activity in their area. We stop giving corporations tax breaks and incentives only to get nothing in return. We ensure the interests of workers are protected. Natural resources are not extracted without creating the value-added jobs. Canadians are not on the hook for environmental clean up when toxins are dumped by negligent operations. This can be done. I've done it before and I can do it again.

As we get into the swing of the New Year, let's remember our commitment to our children's future. Let's fight back for them. Let's demand that Canadian families get some help from their government.

 

Follow Romeo Saganash on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RomeoSaganash

For many Canadians, the holiday season is a time for friends and family. Being together reminds us of our priorities and for most parents our kids are at the top of that list. We want the best for the...
For many Canadians, the holiday season is a time for friends and family. Being together reminds us of our priorities and for most parents our kids are at the top of that list. We want the best for the...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:36 AM on 01/10/2012
A weakened social safety net..

Poverty not only diminishes human dignity, but doing nothing to eliminate it costs Canadians billions of dollars a year!

1) A staggering one in 10 Canadians lives in poverty. That's 3.4 million people!

2) Approximately 800,000 of those living in poverty are children

3) Today in Canada, three million people are struggling to find affordable housing and thousands of Canadians are homeless.

4) Canada's only humane and decent option is to acknowledge that our current system for lifting people out of poverty is broken and must be overhauled.

5) Poverty impedes millions of Canadians from freely and fully participating in our country's productivity and economic aspirations

6) Poverty undermines human dignity and costs us all

7) A recent study, guided by economists and policy experts such as Don Drummond, Judith Maxwell and James Milway, estimates that poverty costs Ontario over $30 billion, and Canada over $75 billion annually.

8) The Canadian Chamber of Commerce says that we need to better utilize the groups (i.e. disabled, aboriginal people, older workers, recent immigrants) that are over represented in poverty to deal with the demographic shift Canada is experiencing.

Our future prosperity depends on it!

REFERENCES:

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/Sen/Chamber/403/Debates/023db_2010-04-29-e.htm
&

http://monctonhomelessness.org/documents/in%20from%20the%20margins-e.pdf
( lots of references in the footnotes)
09:08 PM on 01/12/2012
Harper wants us to be more like the USA where 1 in 3 lives in poverty. That's pretty much a 3X upgrade. He did said you won't recognize Canada when he gets done with it. Poverty is just an 'alternate lifestyle'.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:35 AM on 01/10/2012
'Making work pay': debates from a gender perspective
A comparative review of some recent policy reforms in thirty European countries

http://www.cor.europa.eu/pesweb/pdf/EC-2005-EN.pdf

&

Childcare Services in the EU
A study of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND)

http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/emcc/publications/2006/ef0560en1-3.pdf
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/

&

"Putting Children First", The Economic Value of Quality Child Care Services
Presentation by David POST, Vice-President of Global Client Services, Bright Horizons

( dead link)

so I offer ..

Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries
Innocenti Report Card 7, 2007 UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence

http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/rc7_eng.pdf

The cost of Childcare in EU Countries
A study of Babara DA ROIT & Stefania Sabatinelli, Istituto per la Ricerca Sociale, Milan, Italy

http://www.cor.europa.eu/pesweb/pdf/childcare_cost_eu.pdf
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:34 AM on 01/10/2012
SEE:

‘Making work pay’: debates from a gender perspective
A comparative review of some recent policy reforms in thirty European countries

Childcare Services in the EU
A study of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND)

“Putting Children Firstâ€, The Economic Value of Quality Child Care Services
Presentation by David POST, Vice-President of Global Client Services, Bright Horizons

Studies http://www.cor.europa.eu/pesweb/childcare-docs.html & http://www.rianeeisler.com/articles/valuingfamilies.pdf

* The cost of Childcare in EU Countries
A study of Babara DA ROIT & Stefania Sabatinelli, Istituto per la Ricerca Sociale, Milan, Italy

* Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries
Innocenti Report Card 7, 2007 UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence

* Changing Family Structures and Social Policy: Child Care Services in Europe and Social Cohesion - Case Study Germany
A study of Adalbert Evers & Birgit Riedel, TSFEPS Project

* Changing Family Structures and Social Policy: Child Care Services in Europe and Social Cohesion - Case Study Spain
A Study of Isabel Vidal & Núria Claver, TSFEPS Project

* ‘Making work pay’: debates from a gender perspective
A comparative review of some recent policy reforms in thirty European countries

* Childcare Services in the EU
A study of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:34 AM on 01/10/2012
Childcare is a vital component for children's well being and a precondition for economic growth. We can well afford to help parents care for their families. Indeed, we must do so. Not only because it's the right thing to do, but because not investing in children will cost us dearly in purely economic terms.

Tthe cry of socialism is raised when people propose single-payer health care, high
quality childcare, and other pro-family policies. But Sweden, Norway, Finland and other nations with pro- family policies are not socialist countries. They are nations where government priorities are not for funding prisons, weapons, and wars, but for funding the most essential human work: caring for people, beginning in childhood.

Indeed, Nordic writers often refer to their nations not as socialist or even welfare states, but as caring societies. We too must recognize that children are the real wealth of nations.

Sweden has some of the lowest child poverty rates in the world, very low crime
rates, and students that score high on international tests. That's because the Swedish government offers universal health care, high quality child care, child care subsidies, and generous paid parental leave.

CANADA knows this - after all don't we always hear" The Children are the future" "Children are our greatest assets" " It takes a village to raise a child"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:33 AM on 01/10/2012
People should check out the CMA DataVision website which shows that the "socialist" countries in Europe : Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland, are "Sovereign Tighteners," meaning they have the most improving credit rating.

In fact one can look at all their numbers, like debt/GDP and deficit/GDP, and see that they are in top fiscal shape, better than countries like the US and Canada.

These are countries that have the lowest gap between the rich and the poor and have the best social benefits.

The reason their center-left policies work is because they invest in human capital — people — and this better equips the workforce enabling businesses to make more money. When governments get more involved in worker benefits, like healthcare and drug plans, they are able to keep costs down, which keeps labor costs down for businesses.

In fact, these countries also spend the least on healthcare per capita.

So don't let Cons tell you that social benefits have to be slashed because the people have to live within their means. The reality is they just want to cut taxes for corporations and the rich so they can make easy money. That is the real thing a country can ill afford.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:31 AM on 01/10/2012
The government delivered its response in October 2010 to the Senate's 2009 report, In From the Margins: A Call to Action on Poverty, Housing and Homelessness.

It rejected every one of the report's 74 recommendations. It ignored the senators' evidence that Ottawa is spending $150 billion a year on social programs that merely perpetuate poverty. It concluded with these all-too-familiar words: "The best long-term strategy to fight poverty is the sustained employment of Canadians."

The glimmer of hope that anti-poverty activists, people with disabilities and overburdened charities had nursed since last December when the Senate's social affairs committee released its comprehensive plan to eradicate poverty, went out.

"The government has turned its back on low-income people in Canada," said Campaign 2000, a national coalition of children's advocates that has been working for 19 years to keep Parliament's resolution to end child poverty by the year 2000 on the national agenda.

"The government seems unwilling to make any commitment to work with the provinces to develop a poverty elimination plan for Canadians," said Citizens for Public Justice, a faith-based network of 1,500 people dedicated to creating a society in which everyone can live in dignity.

Worse still, the Senate report concluded that, far from lifting people out of poverty, many of our existing programs are so badly designed that they hold people down.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/SEN/Committee/402/citi/rep/rep02dec09-e.pdf
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
09:25 AM on 01/09/2012
Subsidized daycare is disproportionally used mostly by Monday-to-Friday, 9 to 5 middle class professionals. The working poor work shifts, evenings, weekends, and depend on paying in-home friends and relatives to mind their children. Subsidized day care is useless to them. The only thing that helps is direct payments, as the Conservatives have done...........

As for the rest, it is not specific enough either to praise, or challenge.
03:17 PM on 02/27/2012
There seems to be a logical step missing from your argument. How does the fact that some people working irregular hours can't benefit from 9-5 daycare mean that ONLY direct payments can help Canadians? There are many people, both from the working poor and from the middle class, who do work dayshifts and can benefit from affordable daycare. Think of anyone working for minimum wage at a retail or typical service job. Why should all these people be denied access to affordable childcare just because there are some people who would not be able to benefit from such a system?

Further, the two solutions are not mutually exclusive. In Quebec, we are still entitled to the federal payment you mentioned (plus we have a provincial payment too) even though there's a public daycare system here.

If you can't benefit from subsidized daycare due to lack of available space or your irregular work hours, then you can also claim a refundable tax credit for up to $15 per day per child, which taken together with the federal and provincial payments adds up to about $23 per day (almost $6000 per year) per child. If you're too poor to pay for childcare in advance and wait until tax season for the reimbursement, you can apply for advance payments in installments.
TonyOnly
What is said is more important than who says it.
08:12 PM on 01/08/2012
The Harpercrites obviously strongly believe in Canaduh as a corporate welfare state.
sonoffestus
Got smart & got out!
12:33 PM on 01/08/2012
Wow, Canadians may be waking up to the FACT that Conservative policies undermine society as a whole, while they serve a minority of the population. Look south kids, that is where we are headed.

Your plan, if you have one, should include being debt free, have savings and hold onto that job. The Conservative destruction of Canada is just gearing up.

Having survived and escaped the Conservative destruction in the States, it is very apparent we are headed in the very same direction. The same ideologies and policies will have the same results, to think otherwise is foolish or insane.
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
01:56 PM on 01/08/2012
HUH?
03:25 PM on 01/08/2012
Thatcher said it herself; that people like her don't believe in society, it's just a collection of very atomised individuals, each man for himself, the winner takes all...
12:45 AM on 01/09/2012
HP gibberish-lots of it these days, may be encoded!
09:22 AM on 01/08/2012
Children raised and cared for properly help society. Parents today are wrestling with soaring costs that make having children a choice they can't make. I would think just as seeds are important to the future of a garden, children are important to the future of our country. If Canada is important, Canadians need cash for the economy to grow and to help with raising children. How that is accomplished should be a priority. I don't see anything in government policy that understands this.
08:29 PM on 01/07/2012
Mr. Saganash,
Perhaps if you explain this statement in your column "For families in Ontario and British Columbia, they raise the cost of hydro, gasoline, heating fuel and other essentials by five per cent through implementation of the HST.
I was always under the impression that the GST was introduced by the Mulroney conservatives a number of years ago, and always thought that a federal tax was imposed on everyone at the same time, I know living in eastern Canada we started paying when it was came into effect. When something was purchased the cash register receipt showed the GSt at 7& and our provincial tax at a rate of 8%, The only thing the Harper government has done is reduced the GST by 2%.
Only conclusion I can arrive at is the people of Ontario and B.C. have been conned into thinking this is the fault of the present Harper government and not their provincial leaders. Seems the leaders of those provinces wanted to keep the GST hidden!
I look forward to you reply
11:40 PM on 01/08/2012
6 Fans, everything you say is correct, except that the federal GST did not apply to hydro and heating fuel and only to part of the taxes on gasoline, among many other items. The Harmonized Sales Tax increased the number of items to which federal tax applies, and now affects all items that had only been taxed provincially previously.
12:11 AM on 01/09/2012
In Eastern Canada, both New Brunswick and Nova Scotia the GST has applied to both heating fuel and hydro since day 1. Both provinces decided to show all taxes collected when purchasing an item covered by the GST.
Think it was the NDP that made a great to-do about Harpen refusing to remove the GST from Hydro bills for seniors a few years ago. In New Brunswick seniors living in apartments or their own home can apply for a yearly grant to offset the GST paid for Hydro or heating fuel. This grant is either 2 or $400 per year per household and thinking back to when it was introduced I think it was the province administering federal funds.
If in the province you live is still hiding the GST on hydro and heating fuel is still hidden it makes a difference in the provincial revenue for provincial sales tax. naturally to their advantage!
11:42 PM on 01/08/2012
6 Fans, everything you say is essentially correct except that the Harmonized Sales Tax increased the number of items to which federal tax (GST) applies, previously only subject to provincial sales taxes, thereby increasing the taxes on a range of items, some of which are named in the article.
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
07:19 PM on 01/07/2012
Another reality challenged MP.
Harper raised the basic personal exemption, that helps the poor the most.
And he provided for childcare in a way that Canadians can best choose for themselves how to use.

Not the 'beer and popcorn' approach of the liberals who assume everyone is a bad parent who will spend the childcare money on drugs and alcohol.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicanada
Blogger, radio co-host, writer, editor, voice-over
05:40 PM on 01/07/2012
Conservative Agenda. You hear that a lot these days. It's very troubling.
12:42 AM on 01/09/2012
The so-called conservative agenda has nothing to do with it, Mr. Saganash in his article accused the present government of increasing hydro and fuel oil by 5% thru the GST. Fact was the GST has always been there since it was introduced by the Mulroney Government quite a few years ago! It was hidden by the provinces! And until Harper came along it was 7%.
Mr. Sanagash, as a presently elected member of parliament has displayed total ignorance as to what is happening in this country or has about as much reguard for the truth as a tom cat has for a marriage license when wriring this article
10:05 AM on 01/07/2012
Dumb and dumber. The middle class and particularly the lower middle class are the engine of the economy: this is where true productivity happens in the form of hands-on creation of good and services. Suppressing the middle class is a sure-fire way of killing the economy. Consequently, some forms of socialism are good for everyone - sure it costs money but its a good investment in ourselves. The 'bugger your neighbor' attitude in some of these comments is wrong headed. And who's money is it anyway? Predominantly, it is the middle class who are contributing more and more to the cost of government while the upper class pays less and less (in a few short years, Harper has reduced their contribution by 35%). The lower middle class with limited disposable income has the least access to tax measures (e.g. RRSP, TFSA, etc) and consequently pay the most as a percentage of income. To suggest that it's a bad idea for the government to spend more on educating their children but right to give multi-billion dollar funding to oil patch millionaires is just lupine wrong (ref. Monty Python's 'rob from the poor and give to the rich').
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sdgreen
09:00 PM on 01/06/2012
The problem is that socialist ideals just cost too much. Families do need support especially given the high cost of living these days. Early learning programs imposed for 4 year olds is likely not a really good idea as I am not convinced children of that age are ready yet for prime time. Having said that, there needs to be a greater support for working families with children. Perhaps we need to look at the issue with a support view of providing Mothers (single or married) with at least a minimum income, one that is beyond poverty level. It is a complex problem. However the need to support a family unit is one that is important, not only for the adult but also for the child.
09:55 AM on 01/07/2012
There are so many single mothers though that aren't ready to be taking care of a child that already milk the system
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicanada
Blogger, radio co-host, writer, editor, voice-over
05:41 PM on 01/07/2012
Single mothers pay taxes too.