Early in December I was sitting in the middle of Milne Bay, off the coast of Papua New Guinea, eating my breakfast. To my left at the table was Charlie Veron, one of the world's most preeminent scientists on extinction. We were on our way to see ocean vents where pure carbon dioxide is leaking from the ocean floor -- a reminder that we are sitting on the edge of a ring of fire, one of the most active volcanic areas of the world.
It is always true that the future is here for us to see. We only have to look for it.
It is a scientific fact that the oceans are acidifying at an alarming rate and the impact of this will be profound. By looking at ocean vents and seeing what happens to the coral around them, we have a crystal ball for the future. The acidity around ocean vents mimics what will happen to all reefs if the current rate of acidification continues. The ocean is where life began and is the canary in the coalmine for mass extinctions.
Charlie's work has shown that the last four mass extinctions on earth were linked to changes that preceded them in the oceans. By examining the history of oceans we know how mass extinctions occurred and how evolution proceeded. Moreover, we can get clues from the past as to how the earth will evolve.
He paints a picture of reefs covered in algae, of molluscs -- which are one-third of all biomass in the poles -- unable to grow their shells, of monoculture coral reefs, and lots of seagrass everywhere. Not to mention a huge proliferation of jellyfish. He says that we are sitting on top of the "headwaters of biodiversity": From here life flows to the Indian Ocean, the Pacific, the North and South. It is from here that life extinct in one part of the world can be regenerated and flow to the rest of the world.
This might all sound like science fiction, but it is actually objective science. Here are the facts: The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is higher today than it has been for the last million years. The oceans absorb a large part of the carbon dioxide we generate and most of this occurs in colder water (just think of how the carbon dioxide in your soft drink bubbles off at higher temperatures). This causes ocean acidification and already has resulted in a 30 per cent scientifically measured increase since the start of the Industrial Revolution.
Back at the breakfast table, Katharina Fabricius, a world expert on ocean acidification who was sitting to my right, showed us how CO2 bubbling through coral actually eats away at the skeleton of entire reefs. We filled a bunch of bottles covering the breakfast table with samples taken from the area around these vents. There are also tiles, which will be left here to collect coral growth and compare it to reefs close by where there is no carbon bubbling out of the earth.
Up until now, scientists have been bringing samples to their labs and testing their responses to CO2. Today, the organisms will be tested in their own habitat. The indigenous elders say that they remember the vents bubbling when they were young children, so we know that coral in this area has been exposed to CO2 for at least 70 years. This provides researchers with a way of testing their hypotheses over long periods.
Branching coral grows faster than massive coral, but is more sensitive to environmental changes. Very few coral species can handle the growing acidity. There is one species that does, Porites coral, and it will be the winner. We can expect coral monoculture when the oceans get more acidic, as has happened before. And because this species does not provide a good home for other marine life, we will see it disappear. We will also see very healthy seagrass with nothing growing on it, looking like a beautiful golf course in the middle of the ocean.
The moral of the story is there will be winners and losers -- more losers than winners.
Peeking 50 years into the future at our current rate of burning fossil fuels, we see extinction of many species and a few sites in the world where diversity of coral will be preserved. We see a world of vastly reduced biodiversity and man's role in all of this will be uncertain. We are truly gobbling up our children's world at an alarming rate.
These scientists are adamant: Once our atmosphere and oceans are acidified there is no way to reverse it, except over millennia.
We need to do what we can to stop it now.
Follow Ron Dembo on Twitter: www.twitter.com/zerofootprint
NOAA's Coral Reef Conservation Program
Coral Reef Protection: What Are Coral Reefs? | Habitat Protection ...
It's called BIO-ROCK. Bio-Rock depends on a supply of electricity to change the equilibrium of the system. Coral is almost all CaCO3. Coral is a sequestering machine. Coral growths of 10cm - 2 inches per year have been reported, in the world of coral growth this is warp speed!
http://news.discovery.com/tech/electricity-coral-reefs-biorock-111226.html
http://www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/bio-rock-shock-treatment-for-coral-reefs.html
Now combine this with off shore wind turbine power we get electricity, marine habitat, CO2 sequestering, & oceanic pH balancing.
Maybe you think this would be applicable to the tropics but check this map out!
http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/coldwater-coral-reefs-distribution
Here's a good explanation:
http://ioc3.unesco.org/oanet/FAQacidity.html#AcidicOA
The same site has information about the risks associated with the changing pH of the oceans, and there are additional references at the end of the article.
http://www.ted.com/talks/jeremy_jackson.html
Ha ha! LOL! Good one Stan!
Actually, it is the Church of Fossil Fuel Fires that is getting desperate. Don't you remember? The one where bearing false witness against your neighbor is a virtue. The church where self interest trumps all else... Truth,knowledge, beauty, and love are mere inconveniences to the Church of Fossil Fuel Fires. Trample them as yee may, eh? The church where the mocking of science and scientists is a right of passage.
So tell us Stan, is your intelligence quotient closer to the molar hydrogen ion concentration of a high pH aqueous solution, or a low pH one?
Actually, it doesn't matter.
BTW, do you know if today is a propitious day to sacrifice a rooster? In the CFFF that is....
Have a lovely day!
So genius, tell me how the Kyoto treaty would reduce C02 emissions if it allowed the large polluters like China to get a pass.
Wouldn't more production simply move to the higher emitting factories in China?
The Kyoto treaty has been the holy grail for the greens, but no one can explain how it would accomplish it's stated goal.
You wanna try?
Certainly, animals and plants that evolved to take advantage of a ph in the range of 8.2 are going to be stressed by acidification changes.
On land, as temperatures change, life is expected to move north and south in response. Similarly, ocean life may move up and down in response to acidification. If some organisms are unable to survive by moving but are necessary to sustain the lives of our species, mankind can look to genetic modification to speed the changes needed in those organisms.
Mankind has required artificial selection to support its population for thousands of yearss. Thank goodness we have some tools to speed the process up. Will we have the courage to do so?
I believe modern luddites put a doomsday scenario to every world problem. But good science seems to find solutions.
GMO can be used to modify wild organisms as it has been used to modify domesticated organisms to feed the world.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PH
Counterintuitive, doesn't a unit difference in pH refer to a factor of ten acidity?
We borrow it from our Children.