Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Sally Bedell Smith

GET UPDATES FROM Sally Bedell Smith
 

Royal Bride Wars: Diana Was No Kate

Posted: 01/13/12 12:36 PM ET

The following is an excerpt from Sally Bedell Smith's just published Elizabeth The Queen: The Life of a Modern Monarch . In it we learn of the late Princess Diana's "terror" of the Queen -- and the Royal Family's utter bewilderment with the new Princess' behavior.

THE WEDDING AT St. Paul's Cathedral was a royal tonic at a time when Britian was plagued by urban race riots and rising unemployment. The atmosphere was exultant among the estimated 600,000 people who lined the London streets, and television viewership around the world exceeded 750 million.

Diana looked dazzling in her voluminous silk taffeta wedding dress and 25-foot-train as Archbishop of Canterbury Robert Runcie memorably proclaimed to the congregation, "Here is the stuff of which fairy tales are made." Runcie later admitted he knew Charles and Diana were a misalliance, although he believed she would "grow into it."

Family, close friends, and royal guests went to the wedding breakfast for 180 at Buckingham Palace, while nonroyal heads of state attended a luncheon hosted by Margaret Thatcher at the Bank of England. That evening after Charles and Diana had left for their honeymoon, the Queen's cousin Lady Elizabeth Anson hosted a party at Claridges for 500 guests, including the Queen and Prince Philip. It was a high-spirited occasion, with television screens playing video loops of the wedding. The Queen perched on an ottoman, martini in hand, to watch what she had participated in hours earlier. "Oh Philip, do look!" she exclaimed. "I've got my Miss Piggy face on!"

The Queen invited Nancy Reagan, escorted by American Ambassador John Louis, and Princess Grace of Monaco to sit at her table for the buffet supper, while Philip presided nearby and 50-year-old Princess Margaret sat on the floor eating scrambled eggs. The ballroom was decked out with a canopy of multi-colored ribbons tied at the ends with apples, one of which hit Philip in the eye. The royal couple frequently took to the dance floor, although the Queen looked slightly uncomfortable dancing with Louis, who at six-foot-four towered over her. Everybody danced to Lester Lanin's orchestra until nearly 1:30 in the morning, many of the revelers wearing Lanin's signature party beanies in every conceivable color, as well as boaters and bowlers with hatbands saying "Charles and Diana."



Finally the Queen regretfully prepared to leave, declaring, "I'd love to stay and dance all night!" John and Josephine Louis followed Elizabeth II and Prince Philip as they made for the exit, while Nancy Reagan ducked into a phone booth to call her husband at the White House and give him a full report on the evening.

"The Queen was so mad at Philip because he wouldn't take off his beanie," Josephine Louis recalled. "She didn't think it was proper. She kept asking him, and he finally took it off. But as soon as they got in the car he slapped the beanie back on."

None of the guests at the party could have known that Charles and Diana's marriage was already beginning to unravel. The problems had begun when she was living in Buckingham Palace during their engagement and feeling isolated while Charles were about his royal duties. Secretly afflicted by bulimia, she rapidly lost weight, causing designer Elizabeth Emanuel to take in Diana's wedding gown several times. Charles was thrown by his fiancee's mood swings, alarming dependence, and accusations about Camilla Parker Bowles, with whom he had broken off his affair. (She and her husband, Andrew, were among the 3,500 guests at the service but had been excluded from the reception by Diana.) By the time the newlyweds reached Balmoral for their honeymoon after a two-week cruise on Britannia, Diana was tearful and angry, down to a mere 110 pounds on her five foot, 10 inch frame.

The princess made clear how much she hated Royal Deeside and all it represented -- the rituals of life in the castle and on the grouse moors, especially the shooting. "It was just impossible," Philip recalled. "She didn't appear for breakfast. At lunch she sat with her headphones on, listening to music, and then she would disappear for a walk or run." Nobody had ever flouted protocol as Diana did, or shown such disrespect to the Queen. Charles tried to cajole his wife, to no avail. He was ill-equipped to deal with her demands so he either lost his temper or withdrew, dismayed by the "other side" of the "jolly girl" who had enchanted him with her sweetness. Finally, with his mother's agreement, Charles had Diana flown to London for psychiatric counseling, a gesture she resented rather than welcomed.

The Queen couldn't avoid Diana's disquieting behavior, but she preferred to blame it on the stresses of her new life rather than more deep-seated problems. She didn't understand Diana -- how for example she could be simultaneously empathetic and egocentric -- in part because "the Queen is the least self-absorbed person you could ever meet," said one of her former top advisers. "She doesn't tend to talk about herself, and she is not interested in other people's efforts to dwell too much on themselves." Nor was she inclined to interfere in the lives of her family. "Regardless of how rude Princess Margaret is to her, she never says anything," said one of the Queen Mother's closest friends. "That is her policy. She never says anything to her children. She is a very decent person, but she won't intervene with anyone."

Underlying the Queen's aversion to confrontation is a high degree of tolerance. Back in London, Elizabeth II let her daughter-in-law know that she could call upon her any time. In the beginning, Diana, who called her "mama," visited her when she went to Buckingham Palace for a swim in the pool. "The Queen was always kind to Diana," said Lucia Flecha de Lima, a confidante of the princess. "The Queen always received her." But even after she had spent time in her mother-in-law's company, Diana remained "terrified" of her, according to Robert Runcie.

The Queen also assigned 42-year-old Lady Susan Hussey, her youngest lady-in-waiting, to guide Diana in royal ways. Hussey was somewhat formidable, and she was conscientious in carrying out the Queen's instructions. Known for her sharp sense of humour and for having "the briskest, deepest, most correct curtsy," she had helped Charles and Anne learn the ropes during their adolescence. But as a stickler for protocol, she may have been too exacting for Diana's haphazard temperament and insufficiently sympathetic to Diana's obvious frailties. Although Diana wrote letters of gratitude at the time, telling her she was like a wonderful older sister, the princess later said she mistrusted the lady-in-waiting's longtime friendship with Charles. One woman close to the royal family thought the Queen should have delegated her American Lady of the Bedchamber, Virginia Airlie, instead. Although six years older, she could have established better rapport. "She is pretty, soft, and amusing," said the friend. "She would have given Diana honest advice and jollied her along. "Perhaps inevitably, Diana had a major falling out with Susan Hussey, telling friends she felt "betrayed" by her unquestioning loyalty to Charles.

Diana became pregnant during the honeymoon, but her condition put her even more on edge. Harassment by the tabloids so unnerved her that the Queen took the extraordinary step of meeting with 21 editors in Buckingham Palace in December 1981. Her press secretary, Michael Shea, told the group from Fleet Street that their intrusiveness was making Diana so "despondent" that she feared leaving home. When Barry Askew, editor of the sensational News of the World, wondered why the princess went out to buy candy at a shop rather than sending a servant, the Queen couldn't resist saying, "That's the most pompous thing I have ever heard."

From the book, Elizabeth the Queen by Sally Bedell Smith. Copyright © 2012 by Sally Bedell Smith. Reprinted by arrangement with Random House, an imprint of The Random House Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Inc. All rights reserved.

 
The following is an excerpt from Sally Bedell Smith's just published Elizabeth The Queen: The Life of a Modern Monarch . In it we learn of the late Princess Diana's "terror" of the Queen -- and the Ro...
The following is an excerpt from Sally Bedell Smith's just published Elizabeth The Queen: The Life of a Modern Monarch . In it we learn of the late Princess Diana's "terror" of the Queen -- and the Ro...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 310
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
02:30 PM on 02/09/2012
The number of comments on this article show how popular the subject is. In addition to this snippit from the book, i heard an extract from the audio book on The Book Report Radio Show on http://bookreportradio.com.
I am getting more and more into doing my reading through my ears. I think I will listen to this one.
05:31 PM on 01/25/2012
I certainly miss seeing and hearing about Princess Diana. I hope her boys are doing well with her not being in their lives. I know they seem to be alright in the public eye, but at home I hope they are adjusting to her not being there. With much love and well being wished, Roger Brown
04:22 PM on 01/25/2012
Interesting take on Lady Di. I was around nine years old when she died, much younger than that at the time she and Charles split, so I don't really remember her stint as a royal. I never really realized she took so poorly to royal life. I am a born and raised California girl, so protocol and I go together about as well as oil and vinegar. Part of me understands why Di flouted it. The other part thinks that she behaved in a way that was rather rude and insulting to her in laws, which I feel is reprehensible.
Oubastet
Is my micro-bio half empty or half full?
06:11 PM on 01/24/2012
The title of this was wrong. It should rightly be worded, "Kate is no Diana, and Never Will Be."

As much as the media is trying to play up the newest female member of the Windsor-Mountbatten family, the public still isn't buying it. Kate lacks the charm Diana had. The innocence, even after it was destroyed. And as lovely as the former Miss Middleton may be, she will always lack the quality Diana had overflowing... That intangible, unexplainable "IT" that marks the difference between a mega-star and an ordinary glamour girl.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
handyallen
08:35 PM on 01/22/2012
dishing dirt on the dead is so easy
photo
Crisdean Wulver
We've got our priorities screwed up.
08:32 PM on 01/22/2012
Diana did a great service to the monarchy. She forced to become more human. And although it's obvious that she stepped on royal toes in order to bring it about, those toes deserved to be stepped on, in my opinion. Prince William has inherited many of Diana's traits, one of which was compassion for the common people. Although Diana rocked the foundations of the monarchy, her influence was ultimately positive, in my opinion. In the end she lost everything. But the monarchy survives and is a healthier institution because of her. In that sense, she's a historical figure. She dared to challenge the monarchy on issues of protocol.
06:34 PM on 01/22/2012
I loved Diana and loved reading about her in "THE STAR" magazine. I was always on her side. And of course we all watched the royal wedding. Never liked Charles at all. That fatal night, news interrupted program I was watching and told of the car accident, I at first thought it was just a normal car accident.



It interrupted again and I got very worried now. It told how serious it was. I jumped on phone, called my friend and she said she knew, and was crying her heart out. I hung up and continued watching news then they said....The Princess is dead. I was balling, called one of my sisters, she screams thru the house to her kids "Princess Diana in car accident feared dead!" I hung up, called hub who was at a whitesox game but couldn't get thre. I was all alone. Hub comes home, wants to make love.



And while I was sitting on bed just balling my eyes out. He says, you're so upset aren't you. So he starts massaging my shoulders and neck while we're both sitting watching the news. He was very kind. Was a doggone awful night. Of course my sister and I called all the other sisters. But I don't remember that. Watched funeral all day. Kate is no Diana and I was not interested in her wedding. No offense.tc all.
06:20 PM on 01/22/2012
Coming up this week on "More Americans can name the Royal Family and the Kardashians than can name the Supreme Court Justices."
Benjacomin Bozart
Jefferson-better to eat bacon at home than to rule
03:10 PM on 01/22/2012
Amazing the Americans who complain about the expense of Royal family when the Queen is the head of state and the family have duties to perform. Especially considering the Imperial Presidency where presidential movements are a royal progress. The Praetorian Guard insist on a royal plane, a backup royal plane. Planes full of helicopters, imperial battle limos, hangers on, and of course the Praetorian personal guard.

We are the joke of the world. Bush proved we are a paper tiger militarily and he so alienated the rest of the world that he started the end of the Empire. His destruction of world economy helped a lot. Obama carrying on the same insanity will hopefully hasten the end of Empire and return us to a Republic again. Then maybe we can move out of the glass Imperial Palace we are throwing stones out of.
02:49 PM on 01/22/2012
Royal Inc. and the Queen understands the family business
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheWanderer
Above us only sky
02:44 PM on 01/22/2012
I've never understood the endless American obsession with British royalty. There's no similar interest in other royals around the world - how many Americans, for example, care about Queen Beatrix (Netherlands) and her problems with her royal brood?
02:36 PM on 01/22/2012
Why is there a competition given that one of them is deceased?
Why not just support Kate and Will?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hg wells
10:40 AM on 01/22/2012
If Kate were like Diana, she would have raised two sons by now, she would be out walking through minefields, and she would be 3 years from dying.
wykagyl
Enemies make you stronger, allies make you weaker.
04:18 PM on 01/22/2012
Exactly. Diana married when she was barely 20 while Kate was nearly 30. She found herself in challenging circumstances and showed remarkable courage.
08:26 AM on 01/19/2012
Ridiculous to compare Diana and Kate. The marriage of Charles and Diana had an agenda, unbeknownst to Diana. A different era for William and Kate, maturity, years together, real love, no agenda, other than marrying your best friend.
12:43 PM on 01/18/2012
Ok, so they don't own companies that produce, they don't make or enforce government, and technically they aren't Reality TV stars. What do these "royals" do to earn the right to such a luxurious life at the expense of the people?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
agness nutter
What fresh hell is this?
01:13 PM on 01/18/2012
If their sole purpose was to irritate Americans who can't help sticking their oars into other people's governments, that would be enough to justify their existence.
10:53 AM on 01/22/2012
No their sole purpose is to remind you serfs that titles matter and who your parents are dictate how the aristocracy will judge you, regardless of character or merit. Class snobbery, good show!
01:59 PM on 01/18/2012
if i recall correctly, during K&W's wedding a commentator said that the british royal family cost each of "the people" approximately one pound a year.... meanwhile, the 80-something queen made over 300 appearances - charitable and otherwise - in a single year, while the other royals each also made hundreds... they raise money and awareness for many and varied causes, and are the greatest tourist attractions in england: entire industries are built around exploiting their images and history, all while stuck living in gilded cages where they dare not put a foot wrong without enduring mountains of criticism... imho, they more than earn that one pound a year...
02:12 PM on 01/18/2012
If I recall correctly the queen draws an annual salary from the British taxpayer fund. This year's salary was cut to a "mere" $50 million dollars. Read for yourself. http://gawker.com/5865490/queen-elizabeths-salary-cut-to-mere-50-million