This would be a great time in our history to have an "easy" button. Click: reduced dependency on carbon fuels. Click: profitable green energy economy up and running.
Unfortunately, transformation does not come that easily. Mounting evidence shows us that the transition to a renewable fuel future will be a long one. We are, as Vaclav Smil said recently with sobering honesty, at least 20 and maybe 30 years away from achieving it. In his words, the world is a "fundamentally fossil fuel society." Even wind turbines represent the "pure embodiment of fossil fuels," because of all the steel and plastic required to build them.
In one sense, we are fortunate to have this time. Growing demand for fossil fuels in Asia represents an enormous opportunity for us to continue to market our fossil fuels and commodities for a few more decades. Our energy industry now outsells the auto industry in terms of export revenues. Without these sales, Canada would be a much poorer country and many fewer Canadians would be enjoying the standard of living we have come to take for granted.
But how long can we count on these markets? China is currently the world's largest manufacturer of solar panels and India is rapidly exploring its own shale gas potential. Perhaps more importantly, we may yet lose the international public relations campaign against Canda's "dirty oil," not to mention our position as an "ethical" producing region given our own profligate use of fuels. Canadians are among the most energy intensive consumers in the world. How long will it be before purchasers demand we clean up our own act in order to earn the right to offload fossil fuels on other countries? We may very well run out of markets long before we run out of oil, gas, and hydroelectric reserves.
Canada needs to take a sober second look at our energy policies and practices. A prosperous, principled and abundant future beckons, but only if we join together to form a national energy consensus that galvanizes our whole nation to become famous world-wide for our expertise in energy productivity and our excellence in both renewable and carbon-based technologies.
Along with 12 regional governments, hundreds of First Nations, more than 1,000 municipalities, countless industry associations and a broad swath of civil society, the federal government has an important role to play.
The first step is to help pull a national energy consensus together. To that end, the ministers of energy and mines have met for the purpose, they say, of "Framing the Future of Energy." Many of us are anticipating that the ministers will usher in a new age of collaboration, seeking to lay out the the terms of engagement for moving forward.
Their newly released Action Plan promises just that -- though that's about all it does. It lays out a plan for collaboration, including principles and objectives toward a shared vision, but consensus is not well established. All of the priorities for action remain voluntary and are subject to further agreements that remain 'under development' and to which the provinces and territories 'could' agree at some future date - conditional language, indeed.
Still, we have some solid precedents for collaboration amongst regions. Alberta's Minister Ron Liepert is a leading exponent of this approach, including his role in the New West Partnership that Alberta, British Columbia, and Saskatchewan launched last year.
Most notably, the three partners pledged to "treat each other as valued and respected partners," (see clause IV(1) of their International Trade Agreement). If Mr. Liepert can persuade his ministerial colleagues to come to a similar agreement, Canada will be well served. We trust that Mr. Oliver, the federal minister, will fall in with this plan.
Alberta has other precedents to offer. The Climate Change and Emissions Management Corporation (CCEMC), for example, is dedicated to funding new technologies that will green all our operations. It receives its money from a levy on large GHG emitters that have failed to cut their emissions, but every project is cost-shared with private sector proponents. Although some have argued that the CCEMC is merely letting resource industries buy their way out of an emissions reduction program, it is nevertheless helping to galvanize Alberta's corporations into finding long-term solutions that will benefit both Canada and the world. The federal government needs to recognize this program when it imposes GHG regulations on the petroleum and electricity industries.
The federal government has precedents of its own. It established Carbon Management Canada (CMC), a national centre of excellence devoted to research and development of new green technologies and practices. Other partners include the Alberta government and seven resource corporations. This knowledge network is an excellent example of a collaborative effort designed to galvanize our nation into becoming one of the world's most energy productive countries.
The federal government could expand on its centres of excellence programs to focus on other areas of energy productivity. It already operates the Office of Energy Efficiency (OEE), one of the only databases in Canada to gather user information, including energy intensity in all three sectors--industrial, commercial/institutional and residential. What the OEE lacks, however, is robust, long-term funding and the mandate to champion a national, collaborative effort amongst all Canadians to increase energy productivity in every endeavour. Given the right support and motivation, the OEE could become a global centre for energy productivity -- a crucible for accelerating innovation to transform our country's operational performance, and an inspiration for peoples all around the world.
The bottom line is this: to transform ourselves into a green economy, we will be challenged to find many new ways of satisfying our needs for mobility, comfortable living spaces, safe workplaces and an ever expanding array of digital devices. Think of it this way -- it's not an "easy" button we're looking to buy, but a whole series of new apps that can transform our lives.
But then, remember how much fun you had the last time you visited the apps store? That's what lies ahead of us. With the right spirit of collaboration and a sense of joyful discovery, not only could we enjoy ourselves along the way, we could even get rich!
Elaine McCoy has been sitting in the Senate as an independent Progressive Conservative Senator from Alberta since 2005. She previously worked as a lawyer and was the former Labour Minister in Alberta's Getty government. She regularly blogs about her experiences in Ottawa at www.albertasenator.ca
CanREA | Canadian Renewable Energy Alliance
Canadian Association for Renewable Energies
Vivint Hires Tanguy Serra to Head New Energy Division
Sunny Saskatchewan a potential solar power leader
Solar Panel Manufacturing Brings 400 Jobs To Newmarket
Sadly, the only thing that Canada is well known for is - dirty oil sands. As a huge stain on our map. You always get a question about it when you talk to the people abroad.
Canadians enjoying high living standard because of it's oil? Maybe a few big oil companies owners and their management. I wonder why 30% of Canadian kids live in poverty and 15% below the poverty line if we have all that wealth.
So, nice political talk, not a reality.
how are we going to deal with the negative blowback of this environmental blight ??
this is what passes for national energy policy ----???
carbon capture is being passed off as greening -----disingenuous to say the least
All these words and not even ONE sentence devoted to THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY.
The Senator, in all of her experience, has never had anyone explain to her that THERE IS MORE RENEWABLE ELECTRICAL ENERGY in a barrel of water that there is in all the barrels of oil around the globe.
The Senator must realize that THE OIL CARTEL is not going to step aside gracefully for the release of THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY.
Let me list some developments that she is unaware of.
Enanna has some fuel cells in their buildings in Ontario.
Shell has a $250 million Hydrogen Gas generation plant in the Tar Sands.
Walmart uses Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Fork Lifts in their Alberta Warehouse.
B.C. is expanding their Hydrogen Economy
Mercedes Benz just drove 3 of their Hydrogen Fuel Cell cars around each Continent and this pollution free technology is ready for manufacturing. Honda is ready to go as well but Canada has no Hydrogen Gas Pumps at the Service Station lots.
Adobe, Google, Ebay, Walmart, FedEx, CocaCola, Caltech, Safeway, BoA & COX have installed large scale Bloom Fuel Cell Energy Servers that are saving millions of pounds of CO2 from being released into the atmosphere. A.T.& T just contracted for eleven servers.
The Space Station and Shuttles use them.
So, the Senator should go out to Ballard Power and see what she is missing out on!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJVzySk0Pks
Because of the widespread use by those companies you note using hydrogen vehicles, it should bring down the cost for the average consumer. But clearly the oil lobby stands in the way.
Sad and funny.
Electrolysis splits the water molecule and the hydrogen gas can be captures.
Where ever there is a chemical plant, the Hydrogen Gas is flared off. Dow Chemical's Texas plant has tons of hydrogen gas as a by product.
A MIT Professor figured out how to make and capture hydrogen from plant photo synthesis. He was forced out of the U.S. and had to seek venture capital in India to develop this process.
There are a ton of ways to generate hydrogen gas.
The problem is that North American governments are OIL CARTEL controlled as evidenced by this article.