Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Shannon Kornelsen

GET UPDATES FROM Shannon Kornelsen
 

Did Your Parka Kill My Dog? The Animal Suffering Behind Fur Trim

Posted: 02/01/2013 7:03 am

On November 22, 2012, Rob Shura and his six-year-old dog, Pippin, were in the middle of a jointly adored routine. First, they went to get the mail from the post office, and then they headed to a popular hiking trail in Grand Bend Provincial Park, Manitoba. About 75 metres in, Pippin let out a yelp, and Rob ran towards the sound of her voice. To his horror, he found she had been caught by a Conibear trap placed within 30 feet of the trail (a completely legal act). He fought relentlessly to free her, but could not release the springs. She died in his arms after several minutes of struggle. Shura explains that after crying over Pippin's body in the snow for nearly half an hour, he was unable to remove the trap, so he carried her to his vehicle with it still attached.

It took heavy tools and an angle grinder to remove the trap from Pippin's body. Not long after the incident, the province announced that trapping would be banned in "heavily used" parks.

A few weeks later, an 11-year-old lab named Niki was killed by a trap in B.C. And only weeks before this, a dog named Sophie narrowly escaped with her life after encountering a trap in the same region.

Anyone who has ever loved a dog feels sickened by these stories. For an animal to be ambushed in the midst of his most joyous pastime is the ultimate violation.

The government doesn't collect statistics, so no one knows precisely how many dogs and cats are caught in traps across Canada. One thing is for sure: Pippin, Niki and Sophie (along with all the other reported and unreported victims) prove that so long as there is trapping, our companions will be the collateral damage.

According to the Sierra Club, for every "target" animal trapped, at least two "non-target" animals are also caught. These include dogs like Pippin, as well as illegally trapped endangered species like this wolverine, or this cougar.

So why are these traps there in the first place? And should we support the very same violence against any animal, dog or not? Consider the coyote.

The coyote's resemblance to your dog is not superficial. They are so closely related they can actually breed with one another.

Unfortunately, fashion giants like Canada Goose have helped created a market for their fur by using it in the hoods of their parkas. This micro-fad has consequences: From 50,000 to 100,000 of our dog's cousins are killed each year.

They are commonly caught by the leghold trap, which, despite decades of outcry, is legal in Canada. These traps catch animals by the limb to ensure their fur remains unspoiled. Once caught, the animals endure a painful and panic-filled wait until they are "dispatched" (bludgeoned, choked or stomped to death) by the trapper. Regulations in Canada mean that animals trapped in these (and other types of traps) can be subjected to this hell for up to two weeks. They break teeth and bones trying to escape, and some even resort to chewing off their own limbs. There are documented cases of dogs doing the very same thing.

Coyotes are also killed by snare, a wire noose that tightens as the animal tries to free herself. While the industry claims these traps kill instantly, experts explain that snares actually "cause an agonizing prolonged death." A study of snared coyotes noted a large proportion of carcasses with fractured limbs, broken teeth, and bullet holes, all proof they did not die instantly. One third of them also had grotesquely swollen heads (dubbed "jellyheads" by trappers). When the snare doesn't close sufficiently, it constricts the jugular vein on the outside of the neck, which stops blood from returning to the heart. Meanwhile, the carotid artery continues to pump blood into the brain, eventually causing a rupture. The scientist who noted this wrote: "Anyone who has had a migraine knows what it feels like to have swollen blood vessels in the head. To have blood vessels burst because of pressure must be excruciating."

Despite this brutality, the fur industry is standing tall on its last leg. Due to widespread public disapproval, it has had to face steadily declining support. The industry's only option was probably to rebrand the story of fur. Maybe that's why they virtually flooded the market with cheap fur trim on jackets and accessories, convincing some that fur trim was merely a byproduct, and hardly a moral issue. Sadly, last year in Canada, more than 3.3 million animals were killed for their fur. According to the World Society for the Protection of Animals, the overwhelming majority of that fur was specifically for trim. Along with the millions of targeted animals, dogs like Pippin, Niki and Sophie are the ones paying the price for propping up this antiquated industry.

Companies like Canada Goose attempt to counter hesitations about wearing fur by claiming that coyotes are considered pests in many part of Canada because they attack animals and even people. While media occasionally caves to this spin-doctoring, the science is clear: Coyotes are very shy and will not normally approach or attack humans. To put it in context, there are approximately 460,000 dog bites each year in Canada, 1-2 of which prove fatal. A recent study found that from 1960 to 2006 (a 46 year span), there were a total of 142 reported incidents of coyotes biting humans. That is approximately 3 per year, versus the nearly half a million incidents per year involving dogs. And while dogs are responsible for 1-2 fatalities a year, there is only a single incident on record of a fatal attack by a coyote on a Canadian. Ever. Communities like Niagara Falls, and even the Ministry of Natural Resources, are beginning to realize this, and prioritize non-lethal alternatives to human-coyote interactions.

By attempting to control the conversation, the industry hopes that Canadians will fail to notice a few key truths about the fur trade. They hope we don't realize that a trapped coyote suffers as much as a trapped dog. They hope we don't ask ourselves how we can walk, feed, cuddle and love a dog, but wear its cousin. In the name of profit, they hope we don't realize it was their trap that killed Pippin.

Loading Slideshow...
  • Nicki Minaj, November 2012

  • Jessica White, November 2012

  • Rachel Roy, November 2012

  • Lady Gaga, September 2012

  • Jameela Jamil, September 2012

  • Demi Lovato, March 2012

  • Alicia Keys, March 2012

  • Lindsay Lohan, March 2012

  • Dita Von Teese, February 2012

  • Anna Wintour, February 2012

  • Poppy Delevingne, February 2012

  • Kate Moss, April 2012

  • Nicole Richie, December 2011

  • Suri Cruise, December 2011

  • Jessica Simpson, November 2011

  • Victoria Beckham, November 2011

  • Paris Hilton, November 2011

  • Susan Boyle, November 2011

  • Joan Rivers, October 2011

  • Kim Kardashian, October 2011

  • Diane Von Furstenberg, October 2011

  • Khloe Kardashian, November 2010

  • Ke$ha, August 2010

  • Angelina Jolie, December 2009

  • Katy Perry, February 2009

  • Diana Ross, March 2006

  • Annie Lennox, December 2005

  • Elizabeth Hurley, December 2005

  • Shania Twain, November 2005

  • Carmen Electra, March 2005

  • Sienna Miller, February 2005

  • Padma Lakshmi, January 2005

  • Fergie, December 2004

  • Sharon Stone, December 1996

  • Princess Diana, November 1987

 

Follow Shannon Kornelsen on Twitter: www.twitter.com/shannynsteps

FOLLOW CANADA IMPACT
On November 22, 2012, Rob Shura and his six-year-old dog, Pippin, were in the middle of a jointly adored routine. First, they went to get the mail from the post office, and then they headed to a popul...
On November 22, 2012, Rob Shura and his six-year-old dog, Pippin, were in the middle of a jointly adored routine. First, they went to get the mail from the post office, and then they headed to a popul...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 105
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:36 PM on 02/03/2013
All the more reason to boycot the Canada goose jacket :(
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Torontosaurous
07:54 AM on 02/03/2013
I forgot to mention if I wear one of his coats.first ,I'll tell you that Dani gives many coats away (usually always to people that could have easily afforded to pay for them) for promotional reasons.I know this and understand why.But what I didn't really understand is why he offered me( a friend) a coat at cost.I didn't really wear synthetic materials but I didn't want to insult him or appear to be too poor.I bought a jacket( not the parka) mostly to save face.Sure it's made reasonably well,but I fealt like too much of a follower to sport the bright crest.I coloured over it with a black marker.We had some discussion about the killing of animals for profit,we are both meat eaters so neither one of us had a leg to stand on.He fealt that employing Native Canadians was of a bigger benefit to society then the lives of hundreds of animals.I disagreed.The hunters could hunt something else or do something else,because slaughter on this scale is beyond conscience.Plucking live geese is just not humane.We have different experiences with animals.Dani has never had a family pet so he can not empathize with all the animals or the animal lovers.He is not a bad guy,people enjoy working for him,it's just that he is in business to get rich.His isn't the only business to succeed off the death of thousands of animals,it's just one of the latest.I personally feel that Dani will offer an option to the fur trim and eventually
11:27 PM on 02/02/2013
I am sorry. I bought a parka with fur trim. I love my parka but I am now constantly aware of the suffering engendered on my behalf. I will be more aware when I purchase.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shannon Kornelsen
02:26 PM on 02/04/2013
Don't apologize. It's wonderful you read the article in its entirety, despite having a vested interest in avoiding it. If you do change your mind, just remembered there are lots of cruelty-free options out there that can ensure comfort, warmth and style too! Thanks for reading.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Torontosaurous
10:00 AM on 02/02/2013
I happen to know Dani Reiss.I was taken to see the company when he was given control of it by his dad.I talked to him about killing animals for profit,the livings that were made from it and the public relations nightmare he was about to experience.He seemed to be strictly profit motivated.I don't think he has ever had a dog or cat as a pet.I don't really think he can empathize with either animal lovers or the animals themselves.Sad.The only pressure he will listen to is economic pressure.He made 100 million last year and the year before and the year beforeThreaten that and you will get his attention.You know,he's not a bad guy,he just dosen't have much experience with animals and so he feels very little for them.Not everyone gets all cutesy around animals,he is just one of those people.I think it's just a matter of time before people stop buying fur trimmed coats.Money talks and Dani will (eventually) listen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DebbyM
03:23 PM on 02/06/2013
Well you can tell Dani Reiss for me, that I won't be buying anything from his store until he starts to purchase with kindness in mind. And I'll be telling my family to not purchase from his store in particular because now, thanks to you, he can't claim ignorance and is making a considered decision to not care about the suffering of other creatures.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Torontosaurous
08:13 AM on 02/07/2013
I don't blame you.i won't buy anything from him either! Yes ,he made those decisions with both eyes open.His main arguement is that he employs native Canadians.Personally,that's not good enough for me.
03:18 AM on 02/02/2013
Sign the petition to get the US to join the other civilized countries of the world and outlaw trapping. https://t.co/myCFy84K

Trappers are only 2% of the population, yet they continue to be allowed to kill indiscriminately, and, as the article points out, their traps kill two "non-target" animals for every "target" animal.

No one "needs" fur anymore. And much of humanity is awakening to the fact that cruelty is not OK. Please add your voice by signing the petition.
01:44 AM on 02/02/2013
Thank you for reporting on this issue and speaking out against the cruel practice of trapping.
11:30 PM on 02/01/2013
so many humans are living on the level of insect, cruel and vicious with total lack of empathy and compassion. Even if you think you absolutely have to have that fur or meat at least kill fast and treat animal with respect. Nowadays there is no need for real fur. If only those stupid people knew what kind of horrible karma they create for themselves.
10:00 PM on 02/01/2013
If you ate meat today you made an animal suffer. The way animals are treated for human consumption is awful. I hate to see any animal suffer - dog, cat, elephant, wolf, or any others. We all need to care for our world and stop hurting innocent victims.
09:17 PM on 02/01/2013
Still crappy reporting. Fur trim is vital to save your life in areas of extreme cold. Canada Goose certifies its gear for those temps, and fake trim doesn't cut it. They didn't invent the concept. Have you seen a real native parka? Now, it's true that most people who purchase those do it for fashion and not for necessity. Nevertheless, there are far more fashion oriented manufacturers that certainly don't need fur trim that can be targeted with complete impunity.

And coyotes do actually breed with dogs, and with wolves, but only when they are crammed into areas where they can't find their own kind. The resulant offspring are sterile. It's devastating the species in some areas.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shannon Kornelsen
12:20 AM on 02/02/2013
Arc’teryx, Fjällräven, Mountain Equipment Co-Op (MEC), Columbia Sportswear, Patagonia, Helly Hansen and Hoodlamb are just a small list of companies also focused on technical performance that refuse to use fur. People climb mountains and hang out in harsh, challenging environments without the use of fur. Dani Reiss himself admits that around $50 million of Canada Goose’s annual sales are “fashion-driven”. For most people, it's not about extreme cold, it's a micro-fad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:48 PM on 02/01/2013
The seeming indifference I see on this board by those who think they have inherent right to wear fur based on their useful or aesthetic properties is horrifyingly understandable to me, for I was once amongst them. As a former wearer of Canada Goose I also admit that it was a selfish decision and it is with newer understanding that I'm able to say that it was a vain, selfish and truly depraved decision the day I decided to buy one. I now try each day to act upon my newfound compassion, which has brought amazing things into my life. I see the many CG coats every day and I sigh with relief that I am able to realize what was behind my decision.

It is difficult to see the coat hang in my closet but the world is, strangely, less cold now than it was when I wore it. I've forgiven myself for lacking in compassion. I can only hope that everyone else can forgive themselves. No one is at fault. Some don't know what happens to get certain products made, others know but are blocked from making compassionate decisions. I knew of the barbaric cruelty but I was only thinking of myself. It's saddens me every time I see these coats because not only do I see animal suffering but also human suffering.

To Shannon, Thank You for your tireless efforts. The message you share does get through.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shannon Kornelsen
01:13 AM on 02/02/2013
Renee-- Thank you for sharing your story here. I wish you wouldn't carry that judgment about yourself though, it is not your fault that the reality of the fur trade is kept so hidden from view. Abundantly more important, is your ability to reflect on your decision and instead opt for a different course of action. And not only that, you're speaking about it openly. Your story will touch so many people who read these comments, as owners of a fur-trim product, who (just like you) feel conflicted, but many don't yet have the words for why, or know what to do about it. So thank YOU for sharing your story, it's touched me very deeply.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
see-ellen2001
04:58 PM on 02/01/2013
If traps are set, cant they attach a device by chain that will release the hold?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shannon Kornelsen
06:19 PM on 02/01/2013
Unfortunately, often the traps are chained to trees so that people can't disable/remove them.
03:30 PM on 02/01/2013
How long until toddlers end up in the traps I wonder...
People keep saying there's a population problem with animals when there clearly isn't... they just don't like the animal in question... There's a human population problem for sure.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shannon Kornelsen
07:31 PM on 02/01/2013
A 13 year old boy ini Abbotsford, BC got his foot caught in a Conibear while he was playing near a local park. He saw the chains and pulled on them out of curiosity. His cries drew adults to the scene, and they released him from the trap. It is only a matter of time before it happens again, and perhaps with even more devastating consequences. (This is a list of reported 'non-target' incidents: http://www.furbearerdefenders.com/campaigns/trapping?id=115)
02:48 PM on 02/01/2013
The article above is not quite accurate. While trapping is legal in many provincial parks, the trap that took Pippin's life was set illegally.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shannon Kornelsen
03:26 PM on 02/01/2013
Until Pippin's death, trapping was legal in the park, and there was no set distance that the trap had to be away from a trail. It has not been confirmed that it was "illegally set" (some accounts are claiming it was illegal because the trapper may not have been licensed, but that doesn't mean the actual trap or location of it was illegal). This article states the director believes it was legal: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/grieving-owner-seeks-trap-ban-181793541.html
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shannon Kornelsen
03:54 PM on 02/01/2013
Actually, the article is correct. At first, the consevation officer thought it may have been illegal, but it turns out it was legal. Jim Duncan (Director of Wildlife with MB Conservation) confirmed this in the media (http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/grieving-owner-seeks-trap-ban-181793541.html)
01:54 PM on 02/01/2013
Trapping is not only legal in Canada, it is required in many palces to help control populations rthat would otherwise be out of control. Beaver is one of those animals that can create tremendous damage if not controlled. Traps are used because many of these animals are very difficult, if not impossible to hunt enough to lower the populations.

Now placing traps close to trails doesn't seem like a smart - at least without warning dog owners that there are traps there & to keep dogs on a leash.

Coyote population has been expanding rapidly across Canada & definitely need to controlled. In the east they've cross bred with wolves which is a deadly combination. The coy-wolves are now bigger but without the fear of man that wolves have. Thinking coyotes are just like dogs is naive & dangerous.
03:23 PM on 02/01/2013
It's coy-dogs that have less fear. Beavers are protected and it's illegal to kill them or mess up a dam... and there aren't too many coyotes.. :p
Funny facts you have.
I live in the woods safely... Coyotes stay away from people... they're not retarded... they definitely need to be left alone. Key predators must be left in place or the whole system falls...
Not all dogs are *walked* city leash dogs. All the country dogs just go outside by themselves.
06:50 PM on 02/01/2013
No the facts are not funny, they are based on research & knowledge of laws & reading wildlife biologists. As for coy-dogs, no I am talking about coy-wolves & not only do they exist, biologist think that from Ontario east all are now coy-wolves. And yes, they are a concern. As for the predator/prey situation, no it's not left to themselves. All wildlife ministries are active in monitoring & setting license limits to help manage populations. Left alone, the system goes off kilter. BTW, use of the word "retarded" is an offensive word & inappropriate.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shannon Kornelsen
04:05 PM on 02/01/2013
When it comes to coyotes, the position of many experts is that non-lethal coexistence plans are not only the fairest, they are also the most effective. Evidence shows that increased pressure on coyotes (hunting/trapping) actually results in an increase in their populations.

It is the position of the Association for the Protection of Fur-Bearing Animals that non-lethal alternatives to all varieties of human-animal interactions are viable and effective. We discuss this a lot at our annual Living With Wildlife conference which sees people from animal protection, various levels of government, scientists and community groups come together to discuss progress, peaceful approaches to settling human-wildlife conflict. (http://furbearerdefenders.com/campaigns/living-with-wildlife)
06:45 PM on 02/01/2013
I have heard that "rebound effect" theory before & do not believe it. It has not been proven by science. My opinion is based on wildlife biologist not from animal activists. Yes we need to co-exist with animals but it cannot always happen. Example - re-locating bears after interaction - typically they find their way back & problem re-surfaces.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Imma Okay
01:11 PM on 02/01/2013
I couldn't care less about your dogs or any of the other animals you mention. I'm going to wear fur simply because I can, and that's the end of it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shannon Kornelsen
02:53 PM on 02/01/2013
You're right, you can wear fur. No laws against that (not here anyway)! But most people do actually care about dogs and other animals, and choose not to wear fur. This article is intended to highlight an invisible component of the fur trade. If you have no ethical qualms, I'm not even sure why you commented, but thanks for weighing in and I wish you the best.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:42 AM on 02/02/2013
Picturing you sporting your made in China dog fur trimmed coat, Imma.