Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Supriya Dwivedi

GET UPDATES FROM Supriya Dwivedi
 

En Français, S.V.P.!

Posted: 10/31/11 06:00 PM ET

Harper and the Conservatives were elected to a majority government with next to no help from Quebec. As a result, the Tories have decided to rub it in Quebec's face. There is a long list of exemplifications of this, however, the most egregious of all the offences is the federal government's systematic disregard for the second official language of this country.

Since coming into power, the Tories have been stacking federal positions with Anglophones who can't speak French. First, there was Harper's communications director then there was the nomination of Michael Moldaver to the Supreme Court, and now there is the appointment of Michael Ferguson, a unilingual auditor general. Which is particularly odd, considering that Mr. Ferguson was the Deputy Finance Minister for New Brunswick, the country's only officially bilingual province, so one would have figured Mr. Ferguson would have needed to be bilingual for the provincial position he held.

All of the resolutely Anglophone speakers have vowed to learn French, but is that really enough? With a recession looming, and many people looking for jobs, shouldn't the government only be hiring truly qualified candidates? After all, the job description for the auditor general explicitly stated that proficiency in both languages was a requirement.

Moreover, on somewhat of a tangential aside, it is rather unfortunate that being a judge in the country's highest tribunal does not call for mandatory bilingualism. It only seems fair that someone getting paid over $300 000 until the age of 75 on the tax dollar of French-speaking Canadians should be able to understand those Canadians instead of wasting more of their tax dollars on further interpretation and translation services.

English-speaking Canada is often guilty of painting Quebec as a temper tantrum-throwing child, who must be appeased to keep the family peace. Now, I'm not one to deny that my province can be quite vocal and even unreasonable at times, but asking for important federal positions to be filled with bilingual candidates is not unreasonable.

It is imperative to note here that the Quebecers and French Canadians who find this kind of treatment from the federal government appalling should not be relegated to the usual Franco supremacist faction of the province, whose habitual pastimes include harassing English mom-and-pop shop owners, and trying to extend Bill 101 to CEGEPs and universities.

In reality, this is not the usual gratuitous paranoia that Quebec often harbours towards the federal government. Right now in Quebec our panties, or rather, our culottes, are in a bunch for good reason. Harper's appointment of all these people, who are incapable of communicating with over seven million Canadians, or roughly a little over 20 per cent of Canada's population, is a slap in the face to French Canadians.

It sends the already long-harboured message that Quebec is treated as an outsider; akin to that uncle nobody likes at Thanksgiving. (You know, your family invites him because he married your dad's sister, but nobody really wants to talk him, so everyone tries avoiding him instead.)

Undoubtedly, it is a sad reality that the relationship between French and English Canada has been a fragile one since 1763. I guess I just figured that in 2011, the federal government wouldn't be trying to make it worse.

 

Follow Supriya Dwivedi on Twitter: www.twitter.com/supriyadwivedi

Harper and the Conservatives were elected to a majority government with next to no help from Quebec. As a result, the Tories have decided to rub it in Quebec's face. There is a long list of exemplific...
Harper and the Conservatives were elected to a majority government with next to no help from Quebec. As a result, the Tories have decided to rub it in Quebec's face. There is a long list of exemplific...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 66
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:04 PM on 11/01/2011
Do you want the best person for the job or the best bilingual person for the job? Michael Ferguson seems to have done a good enough job as the AG for New Brunswick (that other bilingual province) that he was asked to be AG for Canada. Now, I don't know about you, but I want the most competent people, not the best bilingual.
05:55 PM on 11/01/2011
all these comments about getting the "most qualified" vs. the "most bilingual" are ridiculous.

there are plenty of "qualified" people to go around, and being bilingual only adds to it, not detracts from it.

it's not like this guy invented compound interest or anything, you mean to tell me there is not a single other person with the same qualifications, with the added bonus that they are bilingual?
06:43 PM on 11/01/2011
There may well be, tell me who the "best bilingual person with several years of being a provincial AG" is.
09:19 PM on 11/05/2011
Canadians - francophones and anglophones - deserve the best: the most competent bilingual candidate for the job. Is that too much to ask for? I think not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DidiM
Human 'being'
09:11 AM on 11/06/2011
It is much too much to ask, because Quebec's politicians (illegally) took it upon themselves to OPT Out of the Officially Bilingual Agreement and therefore why on earth should the rest of the country be forced to become bilingual in order to hold a senior position in Canada? It's all nonsense and I repeat - the language laws are illegal and discriminatory beyond description. It's ethnic cleansing and THAT is what has to be denounced and abolished immediately.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Karmazenuk
Author, Freelance Journalist, Curmudgeon
01:58 PM on 11/01/2011
I live in Montreal.

I can't get served in English at my local Post Office - they don't even fly the Canadian flag there. I've had to, in the past, specifically request to be addressed in English at HRDC offices, as well as the Federal Passport office.

When the rest of Canada finally starts getting indignant about the way English-speaking Quebeckers are treated, I'll start pretending to care about a unilingual-English Federal appointment.
03:21 PM on 11/01/2011
I agree that this kind of behaviour in Quebec is ridiculous in a federal building, but unfortunately, the biggest backlash of the rest of Canada ignoring their French speaking counterparts will be on the English speaking Quebeckers... watch to see how complaints to the office de la langue francaise in Westmount will sky rocket.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Karmazenuk
Author, Freelance Journalist, Curmudgeon
04:43 PM on 11/01/2011
Irrelevant. What the language hard-liners and separatists keep failing to accept is that Quebec is multicultural, multilingual and Federalist.

This is just another tempest in a pot of pea soup, which will be used to gain what little leverage it can give them. The re-emerging Anglo Rights movement in Quebec will get more mileage from whatever the francosupremacists come up with next, trust me.
12:05 PM on 11/01/2011
Non issue. Got anything interesting to talk about. If I get audited, I could care less what language it was in. I'm pretty sure the numbers are the same in any language. Quebec needs to get off this "woe is me" pulpit and grow up.
02:07 PM on 11/01/2011
yes, 7 million people who can't be understood in their language, which is an official language of the country, is a non-issue. how right you are. (*sarcasm)
07:31 PM on 11/01/2011
Quebecers voted in NDP MPs that can't speak french which I think sets precedent that speaking french is not really required when it comes to federal representation. So, like I said, non issue.
05:59 PM on 11/01/2011
i seriously doubt you would say that if harper appointed a franco unilingual to the SCC, as his comm director and as AG.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
09:45 AM on 11/01/2011
i think having mandatory bilingual judges would be an unfair burden for judges from other provinces to have to overcome.

but the rest of the article makes sense. how is he from new brunswick and unilingual anyway?
08:56 AM on 11/01/2011
this shouldn't even be an issue of french vs. english.

this should be an issue that the cons didn't even follow the job description requirements in hiring the AG.
08:40 AM on 11/01/2011
great article, supriya! i think it was a smart idea to state the fact that this isn't just a typical case of Quebec's language grievances.
07:24 PM on 11/01/2011
exactly, which many readers seemed to have missed.
01:00 AM on 11/01/2011
"Now, I'm not one to deny that my province can be quite vocal and even unreasonable at times, but asking for important federal positions to be filled with bilingual candidates is not unreasonable. "

How about Quebecers who sue Air Canada because the stewardess gives them 7-Up instead of Sprite?
08:41 AM on 11/01/2011
yes, exactly. did that guy end up winning his case?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dtrobert
08:47 AM on 11/01/2011
"Quebecers": you mean, one quebecer. And how the hell is that representative of the whole of Quebec??
09:46 AM on 11/01/2011
exactly! one guy takes his language rights to the max, and the whole province gets painted as a bunch of sprite drinking crazies.
07:40 PM on 11/01/2011
have you been to quebec? trust me, that sprite guy represents at least 75% of the province.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YrthWyndAndFyre
Graviora manent
11:17 PM on 10/31/2011
I don't actually think that English Canada's problem with Quebec has to do with reasonable demands. It's precisely the unreasonable things that irk, and thus, when reasonable demands come along, Algophones are more inclined to be dismissive.

I'll the the first to agree that the AG should be bilingual - a point I've made in another comment. But there are mandatory bilingual French positions in the government of Saskatchewan - and you'd get more mileage out of German, Ukranian or Polish. There are mandatory bilingual French positions in BC, and there you'd get more mileage out of Chinese, Japanese, or even Spanish. Hindi would be more useful pretty much anywhere west of Ottawa.

Yet, while French Canada will demand far-flung outposts of bilingual service just in case they are ever in BC and flatly refuse to speak English, there are plenty of places in the Quebec government where an Anglophone can't get service - bilingual English is *not required*. There are a fair number of instances when I've been trying to buy something in Montreal and I've been refused service because I couldn't pronounce the French word *correctly* - not for lack of trying (speaking of figurative slaps in the face). While my French may be thickly accented, my French teachers could understand it well enough.

That's not fair. If Francophones want to be treated equitably, are they not at least honor-bound to return the gesture? Thus the attitude of the West - they view themselves as responding in kind..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephanLarose
12:49 AM on 11/01/2011
I lived in Montreal. I don't know of any place where people act the way you describe, and pretty much every Quebecer I have ever met strives to be bilingual or multilingual. They see it as not only a great advantage, but as an important exercise in terms of mental development (becoming multilingual early facilitates the process later on...).
Robert Vitulano
What did the dino say to the car? RAWR
08:11 AM on 11/01/2011
No, many Montrealers are unilingual French, or bilingual but non-English speaking. It is a reality here. I haven't had service refused since the early '90s though.
09:48 AM on 11/01/2011
@stephan, i don't think the majority of people strive to be multilingual, perhaps in montreal, but not in Quebec city, and def not in places like chicoutimi
07:25 AM on 11/01/2011
Agree with you.

It's a two way relationship. And while you should be able to get service in English in Montreal... trying to do the same in Quebec city or Alma.

A relationship works when both party are willing to work with the other.
06:01 PM on 11/01/2011
michel, how do you propose both sides start working with each other if the federal gov't keeps doing this?
09:57 PM on 10/31/2011
right on. it is so bizarre that SCC judges don't have mandatory bilingualism.

also, it's not like it takes 2 weeks to learn French...so their assertion that they will learn it is moot.
07:08 PM on 10/31/2011
It makes sense for the auditor general to have to be fully bilingual in French and English; less so on the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court should have a mandatory minimum number of chairs filled by French/English bilinguals, but not all. This will prevent the marginalization of legal representatives from places such as British Columbia, where French is a very limited part of the cultural milieu and a Mandarin/English judge would be more representative of the region.

It may be a more complex system, and it may require that we spend additional money on translation services, but I'm willing to accept that if it means no part of our country is marginalized.
09:37 PM on 10/31/2011
the Supreme Court is supposed to represent Canada, there is an allocation of judges based on region so that Canada is represented. Canada has 2 official languages. Being a supreme court judge is the highest honour any lawyer/judge can receive. It seems like a no-brainer that you would have to at least speak both official languages. plus, let's not forget how much money they make, the fact that they can't get fired, get a huge pension, etc.
10:04 PM on 10/31/2011
interesting point, except judges are chosen by region, so, there are 2 judges for the western region. meaning, that the judge would have to represent all the prairie provinces, not just BC if they were chosen from there.
06:12 PM on 10/31/2011
ahahahaha, i love it "Right now in Quebec our panties, or rather, our culottes, are in a bunch for good reason"...you might as well have said "nos bobettes"