Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Julian Fantino

GET UPDATES FROM Julian Fantino
 

Dear NDP: CIDA Does Not Need Your Economic Advice

Posted: 12/21/2012 12:40 am

NDP take their reckless economic sideshow to the developing world

I read NDP MP Helen Laverdière's piece in the Huffington Post with great interest. I find it ironic that the NDP, a party that wishes to impose a $21-billion carbon tax on Canadians and more than $50-billion in radical spending measures while we face global economic uncertainty, now wants to give advice to developing countries on their economic development.

Let me take this opportunity to enlighten the MP and the NDP about the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) and dispel their myths.

Our Conservative government is focused on delivering tangible results for those most in need around the world. As I stated in my speech to the Economic Club of Canada: This means using any and all legitimate tools, and all partners available to us to meet this critical objective, including the private sector. We do not subsidize private sector companies as Laverdière led your readers to believe. We do not subsidize NGOs for that matter. We are an outcomes-driven agency and we will work with all legitimate partners who can help free people from the ill effects of poverty.

CIDA collaborates with developing country governments, civil society, multilateral institutions and the private sector in all areas of development, such as basic health, education and food assistance. They are all necessary partners to achieving meaningful development and economic growth that raises people out of poverty. A stronger economy creates more opportunities, more jobs, and allows families to support themselves. We cannot do this without the private sector.

When we speak about the private sector, CIDA is equally speaking about large multinational companies that employ millions of people worldwide, and individual entrepreneurs operating in remote villages in the developing world.

Let me give you an example: Due to CIDA's work, Vu Thi Ha -- a terracotta pot factory owner in Vietnam -- was able to improve her competitiveness with knowledge gained at a business development course. She is not alone. Between 2007 and 2010, in Vietnam alone, CIDA helped 1,200 small- and medium-sized businesses -- 90 percent of them owned by women --increase their profits.

I am also proud to say that CIDA works with the extractive sector to ensure it is transparent, accountable, sustainable and maximizes local benefits. The fact is that constructive NGOs understand this direction. They are working with us towards these objectives and are achieving meaningful results. CIDA's collaboration with Plan Canada and IAMGOLD, for example, will train 10,000 youth in 13 communities of Burkina Faso so they can compete for higher paying jobs in their communities.

Development is not about dependency; it is about helping those in need get a leg up so they can prosper. This is a concept that the tax-and-spend NDP fundamentally do not understand. While the NDP would prefer to fund endless talk shops, I am committed to ensuring our development assistance is accountable, transparent and results-focused.

The fact is that CIDA is getting real results. Through Canada's generosity, one million girls and boys in Haiti are receiving hot, nutritious meals in school each day. 7.8 million children have been vaccinated against polio in Afghanistan. And six million people received critical food assistance in the Sahel region of West Africa where a famine was averted because we acted quickly and decisively. This is a small sample of results we are achieving every day in every corner of the globe.

The NDP should set aside their ideology and rhetoric and support CIDA, our partners and most importantly those people living in poverty around the world who aspire to become self-sufficient.

 
FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:01 AM on 01/16/2013
There's enough ideology to the right of the Speaker in the House already. Where are the facts? How does the current policy reflect the Millennium Development Goals? Where is the analysis of the best practices of Canadian agencies already involved in the field of International Development?
All we have heard from Minister Fantino and his predecessor is that International Development, in the form of public-private projects, should be a "win-win" situation for Canadian multinationals and the people in the countries where they invest. However, if we listen to those same people, we will learn that they find no "win" for them. If in doubt, please consult the article by Rick Arnold
Published March 5. 2012- Embassy Magazine on Barick Gold in Peru.
I have also seen the devastation caused by multinational oil & gas companies in Nigeria who benefited from public-private projects.
08:44 AM on 01/16/2013
wow, I can't believe I'm reading this today whereas yesterday's hot topic referenced "A highly critical human rights report is expected to shed new light on the darker implications of the Conservative government’s ambitions for Canadian mining companies in Africa. The report by Human Rights Watch says Vancouver-based Nevsun Resources Ltd. (TSX: NSU) failed to ensure that forced labour was not used in the construction of its mine in Eritrea, the hermit-like pariah state on the Horn of Africa." and here Fantino implies that "Our (his) Conservative government is focused on delivering tangible results for those most in need around the world... We do not subsidize private sector companies as Laverdière led your readers to believe. We do not subsidize NGOs for that matter. We are an outcomes-driven agency and we will work with all legitimate partners who can help free people from the ill effects of poverty."

what a double-face hypocritical government.
08:10 PM on 01/15/2013
This was briefly posted on the CIDA website!! Link is down now, but holy inappropriate, Batman!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AuntiFascist
Orwell predicted Harper
10:25 AM on 12/25/2012
Fantino is the not the sharpest tool in the shed. Fantino's elevator doesn't go to the top floor. Fantino isn't playing with a full deck. Fantio has less credibility lecturing the NDP than Hugo Chavez does speaking about democracy. (Or Harper for that matter.)


The comment means nothing from a bottom of the barrel guy like Fantino.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harry Nuggets
Just keep on keepin' on..
07:07 AM on 12/25/2012
But you do Fantino.
04:52 PM on 12/22/2012
Dear Mr. Fantino: You'd think if you were going to write an article in the paper you would at least try to write something that is the truth. The NDP never has said it would implement a carbon tax. I can't figure out if you are ill informed or lying. And I frankly don't like it that our aid money is going to corporations. We give the corporation more than enough in tax concessions. And I am in favour of a carbon tax even though the NDP are not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AuntiFascist
Orwell predicted Harper
10:25 AM on 12/25/2012
The carbon tax mantra will be chanted by low-brow Conservatives to smear Mulcair. It's part of their gutter politics.
12:43 AM on 12/22/2012
Mr Fantino the NDP have never advocated a carbon tax. Please stop lying. I know it is a policy of the Harper government(TM) to say the NDP does but actually it doesn't. I know lying is a fond pursuit of the Harper government (TM) but lying doesn't alter the facts.
12:12 AM on 12/22/2012
Mr. Fantino makes some interesting points. Unfortunately, he spolls them by taking unnecessary, foolish and hypocritical potshots at the NDP. Mr Fantino is a representative of the most radically ideological federal government that Canada has ever had. From its assault on science and scientists, to its bizarre foreign policy, to its efforts to radically weaken environmental protections, to its denial of climate change, to its assault on women's health at the international level, to its efforts to weaken gun controls, to its insistence on incarcerating more people and building more prisons - well, you get the picture. This government has been driven by irrational and illogical policies from day one. To criticize others for ideology is the pot calling the kettle black, but far worse. Moreover, as economic managers, this government has proven incompetent. Let's not forget that it was the opposition that forced the government to bring in a much-needed stimulus package when the economic crisis hit. And, newsflash Mr. Fantino - Canadians will pay the economic cost of the overuse of carbon through massively hiked insurance rates as all of the effects of climate change (yes, it does exist) come home to us through storms, flood, droughts and other extreme weather events. In short, you are in no position to criticize anyone on the issues of ideology and economic competence. Have the commonsense to recognize this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
King Stevie Harper
03:57 PM on 12/21/2012
I find it ironic Fantino or any neocon wants to give anyone advice on setting aside ideology and rhetoric

Fantino came under increasing scrutiny due to three corruption scandals which broke out during his tenure and his handling of those incidents. Fantino was accused of having tried to deal with these cases out of public view and attempting to shield them from investigation by outside police services.

In one case, drug squad officers are alleged to have beaten and robbed suspected drug dealers. In another, plainclothes officers were charged with accepting bribes to help bars dodge liquor inspections. In the third, a group of officers who advocated on behalf of a drug-addicted car thief faced internal charges.

In December 2009, Fantino was accused during a related court case of having "unplugged" a special task force investigating corruption charges against the Toronto Police Service's narcotics squad ignoring the task force's suspicions that another of the force's drug squads was corrupt. "When Chief Fantino declared there were only a few bad apples, he did not deliver the straight goods," and shut down the investigation before it expanded as part of a damage control campaign.[20]

CBC Access to Information Act showied that Toronto had spent $30,633,303.63 settling lawsuits against police. Norm Gardner said the settlement costs, which amount to about $5 million a year over six years, were expected, given the number of confrontations police face, suggesting that "people think they are going to get paid off."
wikipedia
02:50 PM on 12/21/2012
Well the proof of the pudding will be in the eating . We will see what develops with Fantino in charge .
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
canobserv
08:17 AM on 12/22/2012
the only person "in charge" in this government is Harper.........micro-manager extrordinaire................................................and he's an Orc
photo
Newfoundlander
I'm a pessimist, an optimist with experience!
02:48 PM on 12/21/2012
May I point out to the myopic minister that his epithet about "tax-and-spend NDP" reveals more about his his preconceptions than it relates to reality?

Wasn't it the Harper Governmentâ„¢ that gave a $6 Billion tax cut to corporations when we were facing the BIGGEST budget deficit in Canadian history? Are we not, by Fantino's standards, then entitled to refer to the Tories as the "don't tax their friends, but still spend" party?

Don't forget where the word "Tory" originated. According to the Concise Oxford English Dictionary: "Tory is probably derived from the Irish word toraidhe 'outlaw, highwayman' ". Tories in Canada, whether Regressive Preservatives provincially, or Reformatories federally, have proven time and again that they are not to be trusted with the public purse or public resources.

VOTE TORY AT YOUR PERIL!!
02:22 PM on 12/21/2012
typical NDP take something good and turn it all around because there not the ones that made it. Everything to make heads turns and get attention.
06:59 PM on 12/24/2012
Are you referring to the crimes of Canadian mining companies as 'good'? That says something about the moral compass of tory voters...
01:37 PM on 12/21/2012
If your piece was a little less self-aggrandizing and politically bias, maybe it would stand a chance of being appreciated by intelligent individuals. If the goal of CIDA has now changed to promote Canadian economic and industry interests abroad, why not have change the name of CIDA to Trade Mission Canada-the CIDA version. Then you and the PM can simply go around the world and try to sell the merits of the Tar sands project for malnutritioned school girls in Afghanistan.
12:49 PM on 12/21/2012
Let's see the list of words Cons use to describe the NDP:
"reckless economic sideshow"
"carbon tax"
"radical spending"
"tax-and-spend"

Perhaps you should set aside your own ideology and rhetoric before you continue calling the kettle black. Otherwise your rebuttal is just as ironic as the letter you're responding too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doctor Nick
Hi, everybody!
12:05 PM on 12/21/2012
First of all, reducing carbon emissions might hurt Canada (as a heavy energy producer and consumer, as well as a Northern country with abundant fresh water) but anyone who has studied the topic knows that poor, developing countries will be the worst hit by climate change both because of trouble adapting and because of greater climatic/eco-system vulnerability.

Second, spending on social programs to boost health and education and on infrastructure and other public goods is EXACTLY what development is about. How can you criticize the NDP for proposing spending on poor people when that is exactly what you do next to defend CIDA, citing cases of vaccines, food, and basic education? Obviously you both agree on this aspect of CIDA's mission.