Tim Knight is a regular Huffington Post columnist who writes the media blog Watching the Watchdog.
Once upon a time when the world was young and had hope, and global warming, the one per cent and social media hadn't yet been invented, there truly was a golden age for TV news in North America.
For me, it was in the sixties when I left the Congo after three years of wars and joined ABC News in New York. But no, ABC News (known at the time as the Almost Broadcasting Company) wasn't part of the golden age.
That was all happening a few blocks away on West 57th Street at CBS (much admired as "The Tiffany Network"). It's where the great Edward R. Murrow set up and ran a news organization dedicated to "courage, integrity, social responsibility, and journalistic excellence, emblematic of the highest ideals of both broadcast news and the television industry in general."
Today, there's a plaque in the CBS lobby with an image of the dour, unsmiling Morrow and the inscription: ""He set standards of excellence that remain unsurpassed."
He also hired excellence, including Walter Cronkite who anchored the CBS Evening News for 19 years and was anointed "the most trusted man in America."
I met Cronkite once when I was part of a group protesting the pale face of American TV news. We needed famous newspeople to sign our petition which, in essence, called the three big TV networks (including his own CBS) racist. He signed, and for a raw young journalist like me, it was like getting God's autograph.
Of course, even God's autograph didn't noticeably change the colour of TV news.
Since then, CBS has been taken over by Westinghouse Electric, then Viacom, now it's controlled by something called National Amusements and, understandably, is no longer referred to as the "Tiffany Network."
I tell you all this because I truly believe that if a golden age for TV news happened once on this continent, it can happen again.
And what sparks this happy thought is the news that Microsoft, the world's largest software corporation with assets valued at $41 billion, is cutting its conjugal ties with the US online news site MSNBC.com. It's starting a brand new news service with its own newsroom, its own journalists and a blank page to fill.
Now, Microsoft isn't likely your first choice as the sort of company that should own a newsroom. Certainly not if you believe the many accusations of illegal monopolistic and anti-competitive business practices and violation of antitrust laws which haunt Microsoft. But that's exactly my point.
Microsoft has sinned. It's abused its huge power and obscene wealth. What if it now seeks redemption at a time when the ancient and honourable craft of journalism is having grave doubts about both its purpose and its future? And public respect for the craft is at an all-time low?
What better way to earn redemption than deliberately setting out to become the new "Tiffany Network?"
To that end, I offer my very own Microsoft Request for Applicants form:
JOURNALIST
Microsoft World News
Brand new information organization with ample resources seeks journalists interested in working for the world's newest and greatest newsroom.
You should know:
Your first loyalty will not be to your employer, nor any union, or nation, or cause. Your first and only loyalty will be to the people -- and to the people's democratic right to know.
You're the sort of person we need if you believe:
You're the sort of person we need if you believe:
You're the sort of person we need if you have:
Follow Tim Knight on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TimKnight6
Mark Gongloff: JPMorgan Chase Manipulation Scandal Raises Specter Of Enron
Journalism as public service rather than for-profit is likely doomed everywhere. I believe that to save it we're going to have to start thinking the unthinkable — subsidizing it. Either through arm's length foundation-like organizations which I desperately hope Microsoft will be, or through arm's length public funds.
If democracy is to survive, we have no real choice.