When it comes to the North our government likes to be tough. We will gladly spend $9 billion on F-35 fighter jets, ostensibly to help patrol our Arctic airspace and keep it Russian-free. We will get verklempt with Cold War-esque patriotism watching a cherub-faced Stephen Harper bomb around on an ATV in Tuktoyaktuk.
What we will not do, however, is spend real money on higher education for people in the North. For instance, this week, the Canadian government quietly slashed funding for the University of the Arctic from about $710,000 to a miniscule $150,000.
First, let me be clear. This is probably a good thing. The University of the Arctic is the unloved, virtual stand-in for the university most northerners, especially Aboriginal people, really want. A bricks-and-mortar institution.
But many now want to know where those savings are going to be reinvested in the North.
James Stauch, with the Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation -- a group pushing for a university north of 60 degrees and commissioning reports that show 'security' for northerners isn't about fighter jets but rather good schools and decent hospitals -- says without better education infrastructure, "everything is hitting a wall on every other issue, whether it be the mining industry, Northern governments, co-management boards, or those pushing for social change."
The unfortunate reality is that indigenous Canadians have the prospect of asecond-class education, especially if they choose to study close to their cultural and social safety-nets like other non-Aboriginal students in Canada.
The same holds true in the North. But up there, staying close to home isn't an option. High school students in Nunavut feel "ripped off" because their poor high school educations don't allow them into post-secondary schools in the south.
And if a college diploma isn't what they're after in Nunavut, well, too bad. Canada is the only circumpolar country on Earth without a university north of the Arctic circle. Even Greenland has us beat on that one.
Each year that passes without a university in the territories, the country's least educated and most government-dependent population is further neglected. So too is a society that needs the critical voice of a university.
Who has been educated in the North to deal with the offshore drilling planned off the coast of the Yukon? Or who in Nunavut, the territory recently compared to a failed state for its social problems by the Globe and Mail, has access to a university education in their own region to make some positive change?
The North is doing its part. A few passionate, forward-thinking people have created Dechinta Bush University located near Yellowknife with indigenous knowledge at its core and university credits on offer. Imagine that. Dechinta was cool enough for Will and Kate to visit on their cross-Canada wedding trip. They tanned a moosehide. There is Piqqusilirivvik in Nunavut, where Inuit can learn in their own language in culture. And each territory has a college offering a few university degrees.
Of course, there are also 50 real, brick-and-mortar universities in the circumpolar world. Not one of them is Canadian.
Follow Tim Querengesser on Twitter: www.twitter.com/timquerengesser
Jeff Selingo: Why Can't We Educate for a Job and an Education?
Heidi Grant Halvorson, Ph.D.: The Science of Apologies: What Is the Best Way to Say Sorry?
Deborah Coyne: Transparency Is the Solution to Canada's Dysfunctional Government
It is a welfare and handout sinkhole.
This is a drop in the bucket.
And the First Nations university in Saskatchewan has been a complete and utter failure.
Exactly who does Harper envision Canada might possibly go up against with stealth fighters? And with stealth snowmobiles?
And if this is about worst case scenarios involving some kind of possible future Arctic conflict with Russia, does Harper imagine that Canada would need to be responding on its own, without the full support the US or NATO?
Worse, does Harper imagine it would be a *good* thing for Canada to seek to respond *on its own*? On its own???
Cut Little Steaming Pile On the Prairie if you want more money for other things.
Why is our government producing lame pop culture sitcoms?
http://www.cbc.radio-canada.ca/media/facts/20100513.shtml
Clearly you exaggerate on the costs of the CBC.
As to why our government is involved in funding an organization that produces pop culture sitcoms? Who knows. Why is our government involved in the Libyan civil war? Made its just the way it is and the way it has always has been.
Phase 1 could consist of up to 40 USAF F-15C/D being transferred free of charge. CAF could LEASE new-build F100-229 engines under a total sustainment and support package. After conclusion of 10 yr engine Lease, engines would be returned to USAF. LEASE 80x AESA radars under a 10 yr all-inclusive support contract, to include mix of APG-63(V)3 and APG-82(v)1, the latter being superior in long-range surface surveillance.
Integrate CAF's Sniper pod on the centerline.
In lieu of wing-EFT tanks, old FASTpack style CFT (@ about 700 US gal each) could be LEASED and integrated. For long-range Patrols, the wing-EFT tanks could be added allowing for superior endurance + range over the F-35's capable range.
A Joint Industry-CAF effort could interface and integrate A2G stores relatively inexpensively - keeping the existing hardware and giving this air superiority aircraft some multi-role capacity.
The goal for this 10-Year LEASED Procurement: Less than $1bn.
In 10 yrs out, CAF would have $7bn in procurement from which to select truly next-gen options not yet even known to mankind. This follow-on Phase II Procurement could include an affordable mix of Buy + Lease options including both manned and unmanned UCAV systems of the future.
I would propose this as: Sustainable-Tactical-Recapitalization-Transition plan (STaRT).
The goal should be for a combined > $100Bn per year raised annually in 2013 USD, over 30yrs, from regional and state bond sales (partly supported by Fed and BoC Bond purchases) and direct Private-sector, Foreign Direct Investment, State and Federal investments. Incentives would be given to North American manufacturing and actual regions/localities making progress in transition and sustained investments made in NA Universities to drive R&D. University Math and Engineering study would be promoted as North American security.