Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tony Kondaks

GET UPDATES FROM Tony Kondaks
 

Would You Support a Liberal Leader Who's Pro-Segregation?

Posted: 03/18/2013 8:15 am

Can you imagine a leader of one of Canada's main federalist parties supporting laws which give rights to members of one group while denying those same rights to others?

I can't.

Yet a candidate for leadership of the party that has held power in Ottawa more than any other in our history is poised to win that very coveted prize.

On October 25, 2012 in Quebec City, Justin Trudeau confirmed his support for Quebec's notorious Charter of the French Language ("Bill 101").

Forget for a moment that Bill 101 represses its English-speaking minority. Forget that its declared purpose is to make one ethnic group's language become, by force of law, the common language of all, regardless of one's origin, violating the freedoms of speech and association. Forget that the United Nation's Human Rights Committee found Bill 101 in violation of international human rights covenants.

Forget even all the silliness attached to the recent "pastagate" brouhaha.

What makes Justin Trudeau unfit to lead the Liberal Party of Canada and the country is his support of segregation.

Chapter VIII of Bill 101, the law that Justin made very clear that he supports, segregates Quebecers into two separate and distinct civil rights categories:

1) residents of Quebec who can freely choose to send their children to either French-language or English-language publicly-funded schools; and

2) residents of Quebec who can only send their children to French-language publicly-funded schools.

The discriminatory procedure used to determine placement in one of these two civil rights categories is based upon:

1) who one's parents are; and

2) what the classification of one's parents is.

This classification is handed down, generation after generation. This regime of discrimination based upon descent violates the standard of equality.

Justin is admirably, fluent in both English and French. There are many francophone parents in Quebec who would like their children to become as bilingual as he. Many of these parents feel the best way to do this would be to send their children to English publicly-funded schools in Quebec. Yet Bill 101 denies these parents that free choice.

Francophone Quebecers want equality. In a poll conducted for the Montreal Gazette by Léger Marketing, 61 per cent of francophone Quebecers surveyed expressed a desire to have the right to send their children to either French or English public schools. Yet Justin clearly and proudly supports a law which denies francophone Quebecers and immigrants this right. His policy of oppressing his fellow Quebecers is unacceptable. This is not a quality Canadians want in their leaders.

Instead of supporting a law that limits rights and promotes inequality, Justin should be supporting policies that expand the freedoms of his fellow citizens.

Prior to the 1960s, francophone Quebecers' thoughts, minds, and life decisions were controlled by the Church. The Quiet Revolution put an end to this. Sadly, one elite has only been replaced by another: Quebec's academic, political, and media elite. It is now time for this new elite's control to end and for free choice and individual empowerment to be repatriated to the Quebec people.

Who better than the son of Pierre Trudeau to call for a second Quiet Revolution in Quebec? One in which the sovereignty of the individual takes precedence over collectivity. This is what we expect from the heir of the man who gave us a charter of rights. Instead, the son has chosen the path of restricting individual free choice.

I urge members of the Liberal Party not to support Justin Trudeau's candidacy. Politicians who support segregation are not worthy of leading our country.

Loading Slideshow...
  • Chinese, n.o.s.

    <b>Language</b>: Chinese, n.o.s. <b>Originating country</b>: China <b>Decrease in Canada</b>: Approximately 8 per cent.

  • Italian

    <b>Language</b>: Italian <b>Originating country</b>: Italy <b>Decrease in Canada</b>: Approximately 5 per cent

  • Polish

    <b>Language</b>: Polish <b>Originating country</b>: Poland <b>Decrease in Canada</b>: Approximately 4 per cent

  • Greek

    <b>Language</b>: Greek <b>Originating country</b>: Greece <b>Decrease in Canada</b>: Approximately 1 per cent.

  • Vietnamese

    <b>Language</b>: Vietnamese <b>Originating country</b>: Vietnam <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 4 per cent.

  • Cantonese

    <b>Language</b>: Cantonese <b>Originating country</b>: China <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 4 per cent.

  • Portuguese

    <b>Language</b>: Portuguese <b>Originating countries</b>: Portugal, Brazil, as well as Mozambique and Angola, among others <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 8 per cent.

  • Serbian

    <b>Language</b>: Serbian <b>Originating country</b>: Serbia <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 10 per cent.

  • Ukrainian

    <b>Language</b>: Ukrainian <b>Originating country</b>: Ukraine <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 10 per cent.

  • Korean

    <b>Language</b>: Korean <b>Originating countries</b>: North and South Korea <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 13 per cent.

  • German

    <b>Language</b>: German <b>Originating countries</b>: Germany, as well as Austria and Switzerland, among others <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 15 per cent.

  • Romanian

    <b>Language</b>: Romanian <b>Originating countries</b>: Romania and Moldova <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 18 per cent.

  • Tamil

    <b>Language</b>: Tamil <b>Originating countries</b>: Sri Lanka, India, as well as Malaysia, Singapore, Mauritius and Réunion <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 24 per cent.

  • Punjabi

    <b>Language</b>: Punjabi <b>Originating countries</b>:India and Pakistan <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 26 per cent.

  • Gujarati

    <b>Language</b>: Gujarati <b>Originating country</b>: India <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 28 per cent

  • Russian

    <b>Language</b>: Russian <b>Originating countries</b>: Russia, as well as countries of the former Soviet Union <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 28 per cent.

  • Urdu

    <b>Language</b>: Urdu <b>Originating countries</b>: Pakistan and India <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 32 per cent.

  • Spanish

    <b>Language</b>: Spanish <b>Originating countries</b>: Spain, most of Latin America <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 34 per cent.

  • Farsi/Persian

    <b>Language</b>: Farsi/Persian <b>Originating countries</b>: Iran, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Bahrain and Azerbaijan, among others <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 34 per cent.

  • Bengali

    <b>Language</b>: Bengali <b>Originating countries</b>: Bangladesh and India, as well as communities in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Singapore and others <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 40 per cent

  • Creoles

    <b>Language</b>: Creoles <b>Originating country</b>: Haiti <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 42 per cent

  • Hindi

    <b>Language</b>: Hindi <b>Originating country</b>: India <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 48 per cent

  • Arabic

    <b>Language</b>: Arabic <b>Originating countries</b>: The League of Arab States, including Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon and Jordan, among others, as well as Turkey, Iran and Israel, among others <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 45 per cent

  • Mandarin

    <b>Language</b>: Mandarin <b>Originating country</b>: Northern and southwestern China <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 53 per cent

  • Tagalog

    <b>Language</b>: Tagalog <b>Originating country</b>: Philippines <b>Increase in Canada</b>: Approximately 65 per cent

 
 
 
FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
Can you imagine a leader of one of Canada's main federalist parties supporting laws which give rights to members of one group while denying those same rights to others? I can't. Yet a candidate for ...
Can you imagine a leader of one of Canada's main federalist parties supporting laws which give rights to members of one group while denying those same rights to others? I can't. Yet a candidate for ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:33 PM on 03/22/2013
Dear Tony Kondaks - you say that you just can't picture one group of people getting rights that others are denied? Every day, all government members support rights to some, that are denied to others. Take a look at what has been going on with native people from day one, they get free education, we don't, they get free housing we don't, they get to hunt and fish free, we don't, if they live on reserve they get paid monthly, we don't, free medicare is given we pay and on and on. Take Sikh's, they are legally able to carry their long knives anyplace, others would be arrested. Our society supports all of the above and more, but society as a whole can't take advantage of the rights given to these people
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Maria Korovessis Sewell
To decimate is to reduce by one tenth.
12:59 PM on 03/19/2013
I believe Trudeau's position is being misrepresented here. At least, according to the link supplied by the author.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ansdlmol
03:30 PM on 03/18/2013
Trudeau is and always will be a pale imitation of his father. This apple has fallen too far from the tree.
12:44 PM on 03/18/2013
Tony, your statement on Justin Trudeau's stand is dishonest. I read the article hyper-linked in your article and it does not say what you say it does. Have you so little regard for your personal credibility that you are willing to publish a lie while hoping no one will notice? Or do you have so little regard for your readers that you think they would not check what you say? There are many honest criticisms you can level against Justin Trudeau, you don't need to insult your readers by inventing a new one.
07:52 PM on 03/19/2013
Did you read until the end? My representations are 100% accurate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:23 AM on 03/18/2013
Liberals & equality have never had a lasting or enduring relationship with one another. Fleeting, short lived, sporadic & dubious at the best of times. More fittingly describes the Liberal & equality relationship over the years.

The father Pierre, was the best & last example of a Liberal who exemplified the notion of "Equality for all", when he gave Canadian's the Charter of Rights & Freedoms.

Since that time we have had Federal hiring quotas of minorities. Along with the more recent push to forcefully nominate (instill) woman at the riding level. Both practices are excessively discriminatory, yet are fully supported by the Liberals.

Equality has never been a mainstay of Liberal ideology, instead Liberals opted for something a little different. Something I dub "Equality of convenience".
08:16 PM on 03/18/2013
Good post!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
newcomer chess
11:08 AM on 03/18/2013
Chretien on Justin's "Big Policy": "He wants to replace the Tories"

That alone is sufficient for millions to get up and vote. Anything up that point of casting your vote will be a theatre and this "opinion" piece is part of that. Too bad money is being wasted like this but some lessons don’t come for free.
10:27 AM on 03/18/2013
Yeah, that's right, let's put the blame for generations of Quebec facism on Justin Trudeau.

You know, because any other leader, existent or prospective, is promising to do differently.

(rolls eyes)
10:07 AM on 03/18/2013
Who is this hypocrite Trudeau? What does he really stand for?

"Let me say very clearly that I support Bill 101," Trudeau said Thursday.

"It is a reality that helps Quebec remain mainly French in a bilingual country. If we want Canada to remain bilingual — and I want it — we need to understand that Quebec must remain primarily francophone." Justin Trudeau

"Canada isn't doing well right now because it's Albertans who control our community and socio-democratic agenda. It doesn't work," Trudeau said in French to interviewer Patrick Lagace on the Tele-Quebec program Les francs-tireurs (The Straight Shooters).

Justin Trudeau supports the racist, bigoted, xenophobic bill 101. Yes he supports a French only Kebec (proper native spelling) and forced french “bilingualism” all over the country, nice eh? Just like a daddy a French first, Kebec first bigot, hypocrite, from the province of the Qlue Qlux Qlan. Get back to the tax and spend, have not, high debt, socialist province of Kebec and shut up you parasite Trudeau, yes Kebec where you fit right in.
06:17 PM on 03/18/2013
Excellent post!
07:47 PM on 03/18/2013
1. Bill 101 is very similar to what exists in other provinces and countries. The only major difference is that French must be more prominent in public signage and that companies of more than 50 employees must use French as the working language (a measure to counteract discriminatory anti-Francophone hiring policies of large companies that persisted up until the 70s).

2. If you want to spell Quebec as Kebec, then you should also spell Canada as Kanata. However, neither of these are 'proper' spelling because the languages that these names come from (an Algonquin language for Quebec and an Iroquois language for Canada) did not have a writing system before European contact (the Mikmaq people had hieroglyphic writing, but they are further out east). The spelling conventions for first nations' languages today are a product of colonization.

3. Trudeau can't support forced bilingualism in the ROC any more than he can do anything about Bill 101 in Quebec. It is a provincial jurisdiction and Quebec, just like any other province, can decide what its official languages are and in what language to offer public schooling. Indeed, other provinces have similar laws and policies, though they are applied differently.
05:30 PM on 03/20/2013
Mark,
please inform me of any law that is similar to Bill 101, anywhere in the world.

I was under the impression that there are not many (or even none), I've tried to do some research on that subject and have not found much... there is a recent movement in Russia to ban foreign words from penetrating the Russian language, but that's all I've be able to find.
Thanks.

.David
09:47 AM on 03/18/2013
Really it doesn't matter, Justine will be the next Leader he will have to develop and grow in the position and like all Politicians he will learn what it takes in compromise to get anything accomplished in government. Basically the Harper government is doomed it's a government based on the values of Corporate America, which simply isn't the Values of Canadians.
06:17 PM on 03/18/2013
Dream on.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
canobserv
08:52 AM on 03/19/2013
actually we just have to vote.........unless the Harper brigade plans on chesting again(in and out ring a bell......and where is Del Meastro lately?)
09:16 AM on 03/18/2013
Ok, so if you want Quebec to stop what you call "segregation", then public schools in Quebec should only be available in the official language of the province, as it is in pretty much every other country in the world. That way everyone has the same rights.

You are of course aware that other provinces also have similar rules about attending school in a minority language. So I assume you think that they too are guilty of segregation?
10:31 PM on 03/20/2013
Mark,
you have very acute understanding of the words "Province" and "Country." And you seem to use the two interchangeably.
Also, let's not forget that in Quebec public high-schools are funded via a Provincial wide system, however they are managed by Municipal agencies. What does that tell us?

As a side note to that question: The English Montreal School Board website has a French language section, however the Commission scolaire de Montréal website does not have an English section that I was able to find.
08:58 AM on 03/21/2013
Education is a provincial jurisdiction, therefore education policy in Quebec should be comparable to other levels of government in the world that are responsible for education, whether these levels of government are national or regional. Yes, schools get managed by school boards that operate at a smaller scale, sometimes smaller than a municipality sometimes larger. They are still coordinated by the provincial government. What's your point? So what if the French Montreal school board has no English site? Why should it^ Again, you fail to make a point. 
07:55 AM on 03/18/2013
Overblown, near hysterical rhetoric, Tony.
07:06 AM on 03/18/2013
This sounds like a Conservative Party drive-by smear.
03:09 PM on 03/18/2013
Tony Kondaks, the author, is a former Anglo activist and politician from Quebec. His party's only purpose was to reverse Quebec's language laws and make English a second official language alongside French. It was a one-issue party so I don't know where he stands on left-right politics or who he supports federally, but I don't think he's a conservative. He just truly hates Bill 101 and that drives his hatred of anyone who supports it. In this case Justin Trudeau. It wouldn't surprise me if he were a Liberal!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
06:44 AM on 03/18/2013
Calling this segregation is wildly inaccurate. It may be an unfair regulation to some groups of immigrants--but it does not segregate one population from another. Its intention is to maintain Quebec's distinct society. Now, if only the conservative government would get on with the work of reconciliation with Canada's indigenous people. Who have endured segregation and abuse.
06:10 AM on 03/18/2013
Could someone please tell me how the reservation system that we have given to aboriginals is anything less than segregation by race?
02:31 PM on 03/18/2013
do they have to live there?
04:00 AM on 03/18/2013
Justin does not have a mind of his own. He is a populist and will support whatever he needs to that day to win favours.
I'm sure this will be brought out for all to see after he is elected leader of the once great Liberal Party. I see more flip flops in his future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Parketkat
09:57 AM on 03/18/2013
as opposed to the PC's constant directive to absolutely not listen to anything the public wants and force omnibus bills down our throats? Sorry, i'll take someone that actually does something canadians want over someone trying to fundamentally change the way we are as country and society.

Cheers
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
canobserv
08:53 AM on 03/19/2013
Island is NDP
02:36 PM on 03/18/2013
Populism is not a dirty word, it's just one the elites are terrified of.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TorontoMec
02:41 AM on 03/22/2013
I'm not an elite, and to me populism is divisive and an illusion that it's for the common "folk" it's manipulative to buy off in this case the middle class in order to maintain electoral success. Looks like the conservatives are in power, they are the political elites. And the use of that word, like someone is harbouring a resentment from being the last kid being picked for gym, or being left out of social cliques. Oh unless you mean somebody that has an education. I have a B.A. does that make me elite? Don't think so. I love a good café latte, I've lived abroad, yet I'm on disability and unable to work. Am I a disabled elite for my choice of caffeinated beverage now? Although I don't read a lot, so maybe that puts me down with the masses. Populism my friend is a dirty word when it's to buy off votes. Really, the poor hockey players need a break on their uniforms at a time when we are supposed to be in austerity. It's a very dirty word.