Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Yoni Freedhoff M.D.

GET UPDATES FROM Yoni Freedhoff M.D.

Campbell's Soup Re-salting Belies True Corporate Responsiblity... Profit

Posted: 07/20/11 10:05 AM ET

To be fair, and to be clear, at the end of the day, nothing can matter more to corporations than profit, as without profit, there'd be no corporations.

Oh sure, corporations need to ensure they sell safe products, and they need to treat their employees fairly and such, but as far as "corporate social responsibility" goes, there's really no such thing.

That's not to say there can't be corporations who provide incredible contributions to worthy causes, it's just to say that it's their choice to do so, and not their "responsibility," and that at the end of the day, their responsibility, especially when discussing publicly traded companies, is for profit. Simply and fairly put, if a corporation's socially-responsible moves negatively impact their bottom line, you can rest assured, they'll move to eliminate them.

Campbell's recent American soup re-salting is a perfect example.

The Campbell Soup Company's original de-salting was a move trumpeted both by Campbell and by many public health organizations, as a shining example of so-called corporate social responsibility.

In Canada, the Campbell Company has milked sodium reduction for all it's worth, producing at least two television spots congratulating themselves. The first involved Hilton, a Campbell employee who, "questioned all the salt." They then filmed Hilton standing in a room where the salt the Campbell Company had removed reached his waist. The second involved Michael, another Campbell employee, who admitted that he didn't feel comfortable feeding Campbell soups to his children, "he didn't always feel right serving them at home." They then filmed him eating with his family with the then sodium reduced soup he could presumably feel good about.

Public health organizations and health care professionals bought into it hook, line and sinker.

Blood Pressure Canada even awarded Campbell's a "Certificate of Excellence" to commend Campbell for "the company's continuing sodium reduction efforts and industry leadership."

Their fawning over Campbell's was certainly understandable given the powerful statements the corporation kept making. For example, Philip Donne, President of Campbell Company of Canada, in a press release from just one short year ago, referencing last year's Sodium Working Group call to reduce sodium consumption, stated that he believed the call to action was an urgent one:

"We are pleased to see that many of our peer food companies are joining us in efforts to advance their sodium reduction programs. And for those who don't sense the urgency, the Sodium Working Group's recommendations may be just the motivation they need."

Or how about that of Andrea Dunn's, the Campbell Company's , Nutrition Strategy Manager who in that same year old press release explained, "Campbell Canada's approach of gradual and consistent sodium reduction is helping to adjust our consumers' palates to the taste of healthier sodium levels".

So what do you think the Campbell Soup Company will tell Hilton and Michael now that the sales of their less salty broths faltered, and in response out came their corporate shakers? Will Blood Pressure Canada rescind their award, and will Campbell's stop bragging about it? Will Andrea Dunn quit in protest, and will Philip Donne, who when awarded Blood Pressure Canada's award stated, "We know there is still more work to be done and we are hopeful our leadership will inspire industry changes," ponder on his leadership inspiring industry change for increased sodium?

Not a chance.

And what of the public who were led to believe that health steadied the hands of Campbell's?

At the end of the day people need to remember that corporations don't do things out of the goodness off their hearts, they do them out of the goodness of their balance sheets. Sure, if corporations can make money and do good, they will, and good for them, but please don't ever kid yourself about true corporate responsibilities, as by definition they boil right down to plain old dollars and cents.

Dr. Yoni Freedhoff, MD is known as a "nutritional watchdog" for his advocacy efforts for improved public policies regarding nutrition and obesity. He is the founder and Medical Director of the Bariatric Medical Institute, dedicated to the (nonsurgical) treatment of overweight and obesity since 2004, and his personal website, Weighty Matters, is ranked among the world's top health blogs.

 

Follow Yoni Freedhoff M.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/yonifreedhoff

 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave F
Former Republican. Liberal = liberty.
05:01 PM on 07/21/2011
Repeat after me:

Corporations do NOT have your best interest when they market their products to you. They have their shareholders' best interest in mind when they market their products to you.

Marketing is pretty much done with one intent: Create a desire in a consumer to buy more product. The key is to not buy into the BS they're pushing. I constantly point out to my kids the way words are manipulated in commercials, so that they will understand what is being said - and not said - through marketing intended to influence emotions.
03:46 PM on 07/21/2011
John Torrence who is a Campbell's soup heir planted a thousand trees in Ireland so they would give him a Irish passport and then renounced his American citizenship and took his money to Ireland because of their low taxes. This is the essence of capitalism. Hurray for me and screw you.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
11:57 AM on 07/21/2011
Most canned soups are pretty horrible anyway (and the dried mixes just as bad). Best to make your own, if you make the exact same kind of soup (minestrone, pea, chicken noodle etc.) from scratch it will always taste better and have less salt anyway and if you make enough it will last several days.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
echurley
10:43 AM on 07/21/2011
I make my own soup and control my salt intake. I will not eat processed foods.
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
08:42 AM on 07/21/2011
Amazing how interference from busybodies always blows up in their face.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjwrites
07:47 AM on 07/21/2011
Who decided that corporations had no responsibility other than profit-making? What rocket scientist decided that a group of people working together owed nothing at all to all other groups of people working together? Doesn't this mean we are nothing more than tribes of animals? Doesn't this mean that we have reduced our humanity to the most basic level of sheer survival - with not even a nod to intelligence, empathy, compassion, forward thinking, responsibility, accountability and the rule of law?

Psychopathic self-interest posing as good business. Can't buy that.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
12:02 PM on 07/21/2011
Yeah what about that you 'free market libertarian objectivist randian capitalists'.


Sound of crickets.........the silence is deafining.

For that matter explain the super capitalism in a repressive country like China?
And the contented folk of Denmark with high taxes, high level of government services and national health care and a free a democratic system of government.

Again.......Sound of crickets.........the silence is deafining.
06:00 PM on 07/20/2011
I've loved Campbell's soups my whole life, but I refuse to buy the sodium reduced lines any more. They tast awful. I watch my sodium intake in other ways, and I want my old soups back!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HockeyMom
I was here before SP and will be long after her.
02:29 PM on 07/20/2011
We always called it salt in a can.
01:52 PM on 07/20/2011
Hey the free market actually works! If you give consumers information and choice they will usually pick whats best for them.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
11:20 AM on 07/21/2011
So they pick the saltier soup eh, even if they get high blood pressure and damaged kidneys eh.
Yeah right.

Seems like the same coulda been said about cigarettes.
11:39 AM on 07/21/2011
If a person chooses to eat unhealthy foods, that is their choice. If a person wants to smoke cigarettes, it is their choice. As long as consumers know what they are buying and are not hood-winked by false facts, there is no problem. It is our responsibility to take of our own body.

If people stop buying the soup because they want lower sodium, Campbells will change. If they want more taste, Campbells will change. If not, a new soup business will take their customers. Hence the free market works.
12:50 PM on 07/20/2011
THe problem is that Campbell's soup is terrible and barely contains any real food. So like most other overly processed foods, they need to add a ton of salt and other additives to make it taste even remotely decent. When they took out the salt, the soup tasted like the watered down non-food it really was and so sales dropped.

Instead of realizing their soup is not good, and using more REAL ingredients and less chemicals and preservatives, etc., they just went back to dumping in a ton of salt. Because that is cheaper than just making better quality soup.

I never buy Campbells. If I am buying soup I will pay the extra money for a quality product that uses real ingredients and therefore needs much less salt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Gold Standard = four paws and a tail
12:43 PM on 07/20/2011
It always amazes me when people complain about foods with less salt. What? They have never heard of a salt shaker? If you really want to reduce your lifespan all that much, feel free, but don't force the salt on me as well.

It would be nice if I could actually go to a store and get a convenient can of saltless anything. Cooking from scratch is extremely time consuming, not to mention the freezer space required to freeze a couple of gallons of chicken noodle soup.
12:33 PM on 07/20/2011
The problem is people like salt. It sounds like they took out so much salt that customers didn't like the taste and bought other soups (with higher salt). The customer got the same amount of salt...but just didn't buy Campbells. So the issue is the customer (who is still free to consume soup with higher salt). How you prevent that is beyond me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thaddeus Jude
Veteran of Occupy An Office Chair
12:18 PM on 07/20/2011
So what? Newest study says that only high sodium with LOW POTASSIUM is bad for you.
11:59 AM on 07/20/2011
I did not get why Campbell started to resalt their soup from the article. Did less salt impacted the taste which meant less sales? If that is the case then why wouldn't they add the salt back? Its all well and good to ask companies to "do the right thing". But if they are losing sales, what do people expect them to do?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
clemmers
The rich require an abundant supply of the poor.
12:22 PM on 07/20/2011
Yes. Salt overwhelms other flavors. Campbell's apparently didn't know how to make good-tasting soup without oversalting.
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
08:43 AM on 07/21/2011
Any casual cook will tell you that salt it the most important ingredient in any kitchen. If you want good soup....homemade is the way to go.
12:34 PM on 07/20/2011
"Did less salt impacted the taste which meant less sales?"

Yes it did. Campbell's made an honest try at the lower salt thing, but in the end no business can survive by making a product people won't buy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
11:58 AM on 07/20/2011
"it's just to say that it's their choice to do so, and not their 'responsibility,'"
===

The article is quite on the mark, of course, but I'd just like to point out that the notion that the prime directive must be profit is simply a perspective, a human way of thinking. That way of thinking can be changed. For examples of this, look at environmentalism. Not too long ago, the notion that the Earth belonged to whoever could exploit it the most was as ingrained as the idea of corporate profits. To suggest that someone not cut a tree was insanity. And yet look today. We have had a major thinking shift regarding that.