When a Jew has a question -- be it a religious query, a personal conundrum or a moral dilemma -- he is instructed to seek out his rabbi for insight. This Jew has a question for Rabbi Jonathan Sacks: Why have you forsaken us?
Last week, the chief rabbi of Britain decried the late Steve Jobs, specifically consumerist, individualist society in general. "The consumer society was laid down by the late Steve Jobs coming down the mountain with two tablets, iPad one and iPad two, and the result is that we now have a culture of iPod, iPhone, iTune, i, i, i," the rabbi told a British audience (that included the Queen) last week. "When you're an individualist, egocentric culture and you only care about 'i', you don't do terribly well."
These words belie the Modern Orthodox credo that Rabbi Sacks represents. Modern Orthodox Judaism is the blending of past and present, of holy and banal, of God and globality. Jews who call themselves Modern Orthodox may debate how much of the modern can or should be infused into the Orthodox -- indeed, this is the central question of Modern Orthodoxy -- but that some tangible quantity of the modern must be part of the equation is axiomatic.
And what does modernity mean if not individualism? Personal choice and responsibility is the foundation of modern society -- we may think, say, and choose whatever we please, with but the one caveat that we respect others' rights to do the same. Individuality is the essence of freedom, the core of democracy, the pathway to insight. Where individualism is revoked, humanity descends into chaos, corruption, violence, tyranny.
Sadly, there is a significant history of Jewish rejection of individuality -- the staid shtetls of Europe and the oblivion of the ultra-Orthodox, to name but two examples. At these junctures -- when we are too busy naval-gazing to see the world around us changing -- Judaism faces its greatest threats, even the prospect of total annihilation. Modern Orthodoxy is the antidote to ghettoization. It introduces and explores the wonders of all humankind, fortifying the individual through greater knowledge and experience. And in doing so, Modern Orthodoxy intensifies one's awareness and appreciation of the entity that created it all.
Rabbi Sacks is the face of Modern Orthodoxy, in Great Britain and, increasingly, North America. Of all Orthodox rabbis, he is the one who is supposed to understand the intrinsic value of an iPad, because that device, and the consumerist culture that ultimately begat it, represents choice, not to mention the prospect of greater knowledge and wider communication. If he fails to comprehend the significance of "i"-ness, that the cult of the individual is central to modernity, he fails all of Modern Orthodoxy.
Modern Orthodox Judaism is vexing by nature -- it seeks to fuse the presumed perfection of God with the demonstrated imperfection of man in a sort of symbiotic mutualism. One must observe the Sabbath, of course, but it's perfectly fine, even encouraged, to flip on the TV or check your email as soon as three stars appear in the night sky -- there is an inherent contradiction there, and it has confused and embittered some of the brightest Jews I know.
I doubt that Rabbi Sacks is confused -- he is too smart, too learned, not to recognize that his statement flies in the face of the Jewish brand he leads -- but he may very well be disaffected. Perhaps he has fallen prey to the same paranoia that is leading wide representations of all major religions, not to mention atheists, toward insularity and fundamentalism. Who could blame him? Israel faces the threat of nuclear destruction, Europe is rife with anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism, and the West, protector of Israel and the Diaspora, is on the wane -- it is a scary time to be a Jew, and when we are scared we tend to retreat inward. Only later do we realize that this is the worst approach, that we cannot hide, that we must confront what threatens us if we are to conquer it.
Follow Yoni Goldstein on Twitter: www.twitter.com/yonigoldstein
Rabbi Sacks' office clarifies supposed criticism of Steve Jobs
Chief Rabbi says he was an admirer of Steve Jobs
Does this not make the UK's Chief Rabbi a hypocrite?
Religion, politics a dangerous combination, chief rabbi says
How to succeed in picking a chief rabbi successor in Britain
Individualism is NOT the foundation of any society that has existed heretofore on Earth (not even Somalia), it is not the foundation of democracy, and CERTAINLY is not the essence of freedom. Where on Earth do you get such meaningless platitudes?
The Rabbi was decrying the notion that "me-centered" living (not to mention silly, vain toys like the iPad) can ever represent progress. He has made an extremely important point, and you should heed it.
To this point, in a clarification sent out Sunday, Sacks office said that "The Chief Rabbi meant no criticism of either Steve Jobs personally or the contribution Apple has made to the development of technology in the 21st century. He admires both and indeed uses an iPhone and an iPad on a daily basis. The Chief Rabbi was simply pointing out the potential dangers of consumerism when taken too far."
His speech was focued on a consumer ethic that encourages individuals to (mistakenly, in Sachs' view, focus on the goods they don't have rather.
I am a student at Yeshiva University, the flagship institution for Modern Orthodoxy in America, and the big Rabbis here say the exact same thing, so it would seem as if it is the author of this article who has no clue what Modern Orthodoxy is - definitely NOT the Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom.
Perhaps one of the pertinent factors is whether the impact on the human experience is worth the cost – not only in terms of resources – but in terms of the damage it might even unexpectedly and/or undetectedly (until the damage perhaps suddenly bursts into view) do to the human experience. For example, should a technology be considered to be beneficial that causes decreased God/human and/or human/human interaction or that alters the human experience from God’s design in any other way that, in turn, degrades the quality of the human experience?
I have no "i". Well not because I'm not the consumerist that I am. Rather "i" always seemed a little too expensive and a little too zealous for my taste. Not that I wouldn't drag the web around with me every day in every place I went for the convenience it might occasionally afford, but not at that price. I think of all the restaurant meals I could CONSUME for that money. I have a dumb phone, and I still like to type on a keyboard and not on a pad. Sorry. I'll wait til the price comes down.
Well the Rabbi certainly came up with an amusing line of patter, even if he did get the chronological order of i-devices all wrong. Still it's just the same old art of making people wrong, no matter how inventively it's delivered. But I am with him on the Steve Jobs thing. The man has been entirely too deified; a genius at making money off overpriced toys, no doubt, but certainly not the savior of individualism, democracy, and higher intelligence.
Remember, also, that much of the resistance to the Movement was also based on religion.
On the other hand, what religious arguments are you in possession of? What specifically do you think that MO warrants a wholesale embrace of the modern consumerist culture? Isn't that what Reform is for? What space is there for Judaism when every moment is consumed with gadgets? I suspect your main criticism is that Orthodoxy isn't atheist enough.