Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Yoni Goldstein
 

Why Is Jonathan Sacks Fighting Progress?

Posted: 11/25/11 09:41 AM ET

When a Jew has a question -- be it a religious query, a personal conundrum or a moral dilemma -- he is instructed to seek out his rabbi for insight. This Jew has a question for Rabbi Jonathan Sacks: Why have you forsaken us?

Last week, the chief rabbi of Britain decried the late Steve Jobs, specifically consumerist, individualist society in general. "The consumer society was laid down by the late Steve Jobs coming down the mountain with two tablets, iPad one and iPad two, and the result is that we now have a culture of iPod, iPhone, iTune, i, i, i," the rabbi told a British audience (that included the Queen) last week. "When you're an individualist, egocentric culture and you only care about 'i', you don't do terribly well."

These words belie the Modern Orthodox credo that Rabbi Sacks represents. Modern Orthodox Judaism is the blending of past and present, of holy and banal, of God and globality. Jews who call themselves Modern Orthodox may debate how much of the modern can or should be infused into the Orthodox -- indeed, this is the central question of Modern Orthodoxy -- but that some tangible quantity of the modern must be part of the equation is axiomatic.

And what does modernity mean if not individualism? Personal choice and responsibility is the foundation of modern society -- we may think, say, and choose whatever we please, with but the one caveat that we respect others' rights to do the same. Individuality is the essence of freedom, the core of democracy, the pathway to insight. Where individualism is revoked, humanity descends into chaos, corruption, violence, tyranny.

Sadly, there is a significant history of Jewish rejection of individuality -- the staid shtetls of Europe and the oblivion of the ultra-Orthodox, to name but two examples. At these junctures -- when we are too busy naval-gazing to see the world around us changing -- Judaism faces its greatest threats, even the prospect of total annihilation. Modern Orthodoxy is the antidote to ghettoization. It introduces and explores the wonders of all humankind, fortifying the individual through greater knowledge and experience. And in doing so, Modern Orthodoxy intensifies one's awareness and appreciation of the entity that created it all.

Rabbi Sacks is the face of Modern Orthodoxy, in Great Britain and, increasingly, North America. Of all Orthodox rabbis, he is the one who is supposed to understand the intrinsic value of an iPad, because that device, and the consumerist culture that ultimately begat it, represents choice, not to mention the prospect of greater knowledge and wider communication. If he fails to comprehend the significance of "i"-ness, that the cult of the individual is central to modernity, he fails all of Modern Orthodoxy.

Modern Orthodox Judaism is vexing by nature -- it seeks to fuse the presumed perfection of God with the demonstrated imperfection of man in a sort of symbiotic mutualism. One must observe the Sabbath, of course, but it's perfectly fine, even encouraged, to flip on the TV or check your email as soon as three stars appear in the night sky -- there is an inherent contradiction there, and it has confused and embittered some of the brightest Jews I know.

I doubt that Rabbi Sacks is confused -- he is too smart, too learned, not to recognize that his statement flies in the face of the Jewish brand he leads -- but he may very well be disaffected. Perhaps he has fallen prey to the same paranoia that is leading wide representations of all major religions, not to mention atheists, toward insularity and fundamentalism. Who could blame him? Israel faces the threat of nuclear destruction, Europe is rife with anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism, and the West, protector of Israel and the Diaspora, is on the wane -- it is a scary time to be a Jew, and when we are scared we tend to retreat inward. Only later do we realize that this is the worst approach, that we cannot hide, that we must confront what threatens us if we are to conquer it.

 

Follow Yoni Goldstein on Twitter: www.twitter.com/yonigoldstein

When a Jew has a question -- be it a religious query, a personal conundrum or a moral dilemma -- he is instructed to seek out his rabbi for insight. This Jew has a question for Rabbi Jonathan Sacks: W...
When a Jew has a question -- be it a religious query, a personal conundrum or a moral dilemma -- he is instructed to seek out his rabbi for insight. This Jew has a question for Rabbi Jonathan Sacks: W...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:01 AM on 12/05/2011
Uh, isnt it 2011? Havent we realised that "God" is just compassion? Havent we reached the conclusion that organised, galvanised religion is the leading cause of suffering on the planet? The good feeling you get at church or synagogue is oxytocin, produced because you feel safe in a community. Ghosts and spirits have nothing to do with it. Come on people! Religion is the opponent of progress, not technology. I love my iPad because it feels natural, so do Autistics, BLIND persons, DEAF persons, etc. Dean Caiman, Ray Kurzweil, Jacque Fresco, and ok, Steve Jobs are HELPING.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JayMonaco
03:26 PM on 11/29/2011
The "cult of the individual" is irreligious. That's why so many religious institutions (along with virtually all philosophers besides Ayn Rand, and she wasn't a real philosopher) have rejected it.

Individualism is NOT the foundation of any society that has existed heretofore on Earth (not even Somalia), it is not the foundation of democracy, and CERTAINLY is not the essence of freedom. Where on Earth do you get such meaningless platitudes?

The Rabbi was decrying the notion that "me-centered" living (not to mention silly, vain toys like the iPad) can ever represent progress. He has made an extremely important point, and you should heed it.
04:20 PM on 11/28/2011
I'm also not familiar with you. Yoni. However its pretty clear that you, Yoni, are not familiar with Rabbi Sachs. Anyone who is would have easily understood that he was not criticizing technology, progress, or "freedom and responsibility."

To this point, in a clarification sent out Sunday, Sacks office said that "The Chief Rabbi meant no criticism of either Steve Jobs personally or the contribution Apple has made to the development of technology in the 21st century. He admires both and indeed uses an iPhone and an iPad on a daily basis. The Chief Rabbi was simply pointing out the potential dangers of consumerism when taken too far."

His speech was focued on a consumer ethic that encourages individuals to (mistakenly, in Sachs' view, focus on the goods they don't have rather.
04:02 PM on 11/28/2011
The premise of this article is just so wrong... since when does "progress" mean that I should care more about myself an about everyone else? The point is that we have to care for our fellow Jews, and all of our fellow human beings and not only focus on the ourselves and what we want, but to care for others, too.

I am a student at Yeshiva University, the flagship institution for Modern Orthodoxy in America, and the big Rabbis here say the exact same thing, so it would seem as if it is the author of this article who has no clue what Modern Orthodoxy is - definitely NOT the Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JayMonaco
03:33 PM on 11/29/2011
I'll be your first fan. You're 100% correct.
03:55 PM on 11/28/2011
“We now have a culture of iPod, iPhone, iTunes, i, i, i.” OK then, a necessary corrective: YouTube.
11:36 AM on 11/28/2011
Apparently sewn into this issue is the thread of the conservatism versus progressivism debate. Do we do what we have been doing or do we adopt this new idea?

Perhaps one of the pertinent factors is whether the impact on the human experience is worth the cost – not only in terms of resources – but in terms of the damage it might even unexpectedly and/or undetectedly (until the damage perhaps suddenly bursts into view) do to the human experience. For example, should a technology be considered to be beneficial that causes decreased God/human and/or human/human interaction or that alters the human experience from God’s design in any other way that, in turn, degrades the quality of the human experience?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:59 PM on 11/27/2011
You are far too charitable to Rabbi Sacks. I have never witnessed him to show the slightest comprehension of the actual arguments offered. He attacks nothing but strawman arguments.
10:33 PM on 11/27/2011
Shame, shame all you "i" owners. I always knew there was something wrong with "i".

I have no "i". Well not because I'm not the consumerist that I am. Rather "i" always seemed a little too expensive and a little too zealous for my taste. Not that I wouldn't drag the web around with me every day in every place I went for the convenience it might occasionally afford, but not at that price. I think of all the restaurant meals I could CONSUME for that money. I have a dumb phone, and I still like to type on a keyboard and not on a pad. Sorry. I'll wait til the price comes down.

Well the Rabbi certainly came up with an amusing line of patter, even if he did get the chronological order of i-devices all wrong. Still it's just the same old art of making people wrong, no matter how inventively it's delivered. But I am with him on the Steve Jobs thing. The man has been entirely too deified; a genius at making money off overpriced toys, no doubt, but certainly not the savior of individualism, democracy, and higher intelligence.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:06 AM on 11/27/2011
Why? Because he's a senior religious figure. Fighting progress is a term in his contract.
06:30 PM on 11/26/2011
once we were the majority ,says my imaginary friend, the great american Indian chief, now we are a minority
photo
BurtonDesque
Fear a Blank Planet
05:36 PM on 11/26/2011
Fighting progress is one of the main aspects of religion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Joseph Mumford
01:05 PM on 11/28/2011
You mean like with Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights Movement?
photo
BurtonDesque
Fear a Blank Planet
02:28 PM on 11/28/2011
One could argue the Civil Rights movement was not a religious one. However, I'll not argue the point and go along with you and just say it is an exception the proves the general rule.

Remember, also, that much of the resistance to the Movement was also based on religion.
05:14 PM on 11/26/2011
I had never heard of you Jonathan (Yoni) before this. So you're an ex Israeli Canadian yordim advocating more or less an end to aliyah. Which makes sense I suppose in your life. Fair enough.

On the other hand, what religious arguments are you in possession of? What specifically do you think that MO warrants a wholesale embrace of the modern consumerist culture? Isn't that what Reform is for? What space is there for Judaism when every moment is consumed with gadgets? I suspect your main criticism is that Orthodoxy isn't atheist enough.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
methodman
12:19 PM on 11/26/2011
I don't think he has tried to understand profitability and portability other than he probably puts his services on CD. Computer Science is all Theology. It is the Religious Studies. It covers the same ground using Nature Formalities and Art formalities. It's unfortunate he never bought a Heath Kit or a Commodore 64 or an Atari 800 or an Amiga. The theology on those computers is astounding and preserved. Those clarify many conversations about Nature and Art and from there you are able to appreciate the modern directions that progress is going. I don't know if he is one of the pre-Gutenberg Religious indigents are not I hope not.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:59 AM on 11/26/2011
Hello Yoni, you both come from areas that have truth, if I may add that there are some people that have elevated material things such as the ipad to be their God and ignore the spiritual things of God, and yet there are folks that acknowledge both