Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Yoni Goldstein
 

Why Not Legalize Marijuana? Here's Why

Posted: 01/20/2012 1:35 am

It strikes me that in all the recent discussion over legalizing marijuana, no one has actually written about the pros and cons of actually smoking the stuff. I mean what it feels like, what it does to you. This is likely because the people who would write about this subject are in respectable news outlets -- many of whom, no doubt, have at the very least dabbled in the stuff -- and are worried that doing so would make them look like total stoners. Fair enough.

So, at the risk of being labelled a pothead, here goes. Smoking marijuana offers any or all of the following positive effects: It will make you more relaxed, more thoughtful (though not necessarily insightful), and more creative. It will make all the good things in life a little bit better, and the bad things a little less bad. If you suffer from disease or chronic pain, it will ease your distress. If you are sociable, it will make you more so. If you're a loner, it will increase the pleasure of silence. If you have trouble falling asleep, pot can help with that, too.

Sounds pretty good, right?

And yet, I'm 100 per cent against legalizing marijuana. This doesn't mean I think people shouldn't use the stuff -- that's up to you -- just that making pot legal would open us to a host of negative side-effects (beyond occasionally crippling paranoia and general laziness).

Pot is fairly easily accessible -- I have never heard an adult say, "I'd love to try some of that marijuana everyone's talking about, but I can't seem to get my hands on any of it." If you think none of your friends smoke it, or at least don't know where to get some, you're too naive. Further, pot smokers are a fairly easy-going bunch -- ask them for a piece of the action and they'll be happy to help out.

So if it's already out there, and everyone's doing it, why not legalize marijuana?

The most important reason is kids. Children are the least likely of us to have access to pot or pot dealers. I'm not talking about the stoners smoking up in the bathroom (who will wake up one day in 10 years and realize how stupid they were) but the more timid teenagers too afraid of getting in trouble, or, worse, being rejected, to ask their hooked-up classmates for a joint.

Legalizing pot would give that bunch an easy in -- the same way they ask adults to buy them booze or cigarettes, they could ask for marijuana. Pass Messieurs Cheech and Chong a 10-spot and they'll be happy to pick up a little extra from the dispensary.

Staying with young folks, let's consider the debate over whether marijuana is a "gateway drug." It isn't, in the sense that pot isn't addictive, but it is in the context of legalized marijuana. If pot becomes legal, drug dealers won't sell it anymore, obviously. Which means they'll be peddling harder stuff (or pot laced with harder stuff) like cocaine. So when kids go looking for something illegal to do, as they are wont to do, they'll no longer have the relatively mild pot as a rebellion option.

Cocaine, by the way, is extremely addictive.

Another point: Legalizing marijuana will turn us into a stoned society. Want an example of what that looks like? Consider Amsterdam's red-light district, where pot smoking is famously legal. If you've been, you know that that area sullies an otherwise beautiful, historic city. Forget the soulless stares of prostitutes that follow you for a moment -- the staggering stoners, clichéd Bob Marley street art, and seedy drug dealers standing on every corner offering a cornucopia of hard drugs are depressing enough. Picture that, but in Toronto.

Finally, I truly believe that for the welfare of society it's important there be some things that are technically against the law but practically overlooked. Some small acts that allow the general population to feel free and rebellious but at the same time remain at least a little mindful of the law. It's like making a rolling stop at the stop sign -- chances are it's a safe move and you won't get caught, but because you might get caught, you come a little bit closer to actually stopping, and you never run right through a stop sign.

The illegality of pot and the threat of being caught and punished, even if the chances are slim, keep us on our toes. And that means we'll think twice before doing something that's really bad. In a weird way, illegalized marijuana empowers us and at the same time makes us more likely to respect the law.

For all the talk at this week's Liberal convention, the Grits are unlikely to make legalization of marijuana a campaign platform -- the young Liberals behind that movement will, like the teenage stoner, regret championing the cause in time. (And there's no way the Tories are going anywhere near it.)

This is for the best. Pot rules are perfectly fine the way they are right now. It's illegal enough to make kids think twice before smoking and keep our cities clean and active, but not illegal enough to stop sensible people from enjoying a nice toke in private. Makes perfect sense to me.

And no, I'm not high right now.

 

Follow Yoni Goldstein on Twitter: www.twitter.com/yonigoldstein

It strikes me that in all the recent discussion over legalizing marijuana, no one has actually written about the pros and cons of actually smoking the stuff. I mean what it feels like, what it does to...
It strikes me that in all the recent discussion over legalizing marijuana, no one has actually written about the pros and cons of actually smoking the stuff. I mean what it feels like, what it does to...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 193
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
03:20 AM on 02/03/2012
I beg to differ. Since prohibition the age of first use of cannabis has dropped year on year, it's now not uncommon for kids to be getting stoned. To suggest prohibition protectkids is simply wrong, it doesn't.

Before prohibition cannabis was very much an adult thing. Illegal cannabis dealers sell hard drugs now, often to peoplewho wanted a bit of weed. How often do you go to the off licence for a beer, only to be told "sorry, no ber, do you want some heroin?" - no, didn't think so.

Justifying prohibition on the grounds that it makes somnething avaiable enough is a bit strange, to put it mildly. What a weird item.
02:29 PM on 02/02/2012
The pros and cons of pot are irrelevant. The main point is about the effects of prohibition (incarceration, waste of tax money that goes to the narcs, you name it). This is why this article is completely lame. And, please, stop using the "kids" as a pretext to harass, fine and incarcerate adults by the tens of thousands.
TransformDrugs
for more just and effective drug laws
02:23 PM on 02/02/2012
whatever the risks of cannabis they are increased by unregulated supply, and decreased by a regulated one. Given the reality of high/persistent demand (despite prohitbition) that will demonstrably be met by criminal supply if no legal one is available - the latter will be instrinsically healthier.

The evidence of a user level deterrent effect from enforcement is weak. Clearly an agressively marketed legal product would be a problem - it is important that we learn from the mistakes with under-regulated alcohol and tobacco historically and put in place approariate controls on marketing and promotion.

Children are not protected by prohitbition - cannabis is widely available to them, often more so than alcohol in the US experience. Yet prohitbition increases risks of use (see above) and also creates risks for children and young people associated with criminalisation and the violent illegal trade - the front line of which they inhabit.

Add to this the costs of fighting the war on drugs, and the huge social costs associated with the crime it fuels and the pragmatic costs benefit analysis looks very bleak for the status quo: huge costs and negligable benefits. Rather than should we or shouldnt we regulate, we should be debating how to regulate the marketmost effectively to achieve the goals we all seek: a safer healthier society. see www.tdpf.org.uk
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
RadicalRuss
Host of The Russ Belville Show
11:30 PM on 01/26/2012
This defense of prohibition is so absurd I dedicated today's rant to it.

http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/20027044/highlight/236191
05:42 PM on 01/25/2012
Pot is safer then aspirin. There are no recorded deaths or illness linked to pot use. There are over 450,000 deaths a year linked to tobacco alone. Please tell me how pot is more dangerous than alcohol and no I'm not a pot smoker. How many people die from alcohol and drunk driving? Over 30,00 per year yet pot is labeled as dangerous. Yet your opening statement discredits this.
10:58 AM on 01/25/2012
Your absolutely right, if a 15 year old needs to rebel and can't find a joint with just marijuana, chances are he's just going to search for a joint with cocaine in it. Get realistic, I guarantee similar to legalizing alcohol there will be an age limit to legally smoking marijuana and how old you must be to get it. "If pot becomes legal, dealers won't sell it anymore", just another great line you probably took from a wikipedia source right? Unless legal marijuana is sold for relatively the same price as it is on the streets there will always be an underground market for it, which will always be illegal as well.

And have you ever been to Amsterdam? FYI Holland has a program which administers free heroin to addicts, which has eliminated all crime and underground market for the drug. That is one less drug that you are being asked for on a street corner in Amsterdam than you are in Toronto, not to mention there are 0 heroin addicts in Holland which will prostitute for the drug.

Unlike you, I am unable to read the future so I am not going to make claims saying that our future potential leaders will regret the decision to legalize marijuana, what if the emergence of this industry leads to a significant change in the downfall of today's economy? And like another comment said, you unfortunately have added nothing to this debate.
09:36 PM on 01/24/2012
After reading the first page of comments, I am sure that what I have to say is going to fall on deaf ears, but, oh well, at least I said it. Have we ever tried to encourage and help promote not using marajuana in the first place? I have never had a joint or used any other illegal drugs and I am happy I haven't. Never needed to escape from reality, nor felt the need to rebel, I have my problems but they are easier to solve when I am in my right mind. I would think that this could work for everyone.
01:14 PM on 02/02/2012
"Have we ever tried to encourage and help promote not using marajuana in the first place?"

Yes. Absolutely. The campaign has been going on since 1937 and we have done our level best to warn people about the dangers of pot. For example, the US Official Expert on marijuana testified in court, under oath that marijuana could make your fangs grow six inches long and drip with blood. He also said that, when he tried it, it turned him into a bat. He then described how he flew around the room for two hours and then found himself at the bottom of a 200-foot inkwell.

You can read the story at http://druglibrary.org/schaffer/History/whiteb1.htm

I am with you all the way. We MUST stop our kids from turning into bats.

Or maybe you missed DARE, "Just Say No," "Drugs are a communist plot to destroy America's youth," "Marijuana makes young lovers go crazy and elope." and all the other warnings we have given. You just have no idea how evil this plant can be.

Just FYI, the biggest single cause of drug epidemics among US children is hysterical anti-drug campaigns. You can read about that at http://druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/studies/cu/cumenu.htm
05:33 PM on 01/24/2012
Children are the least likely of us to have access to pot or pot dealers: False. Children have unhindered and unsafe access to all drugs that are illegal because they operate on the black market. Ask a 15 year-old to go buy marijuana, a fifth of vodka, and a pack of cigarettes. The kid will come back with marijuana first, because they don't have to show an ID to a store clerk to buy it. Drug dealers don't care how old a kid is, as long as they can get their money.
Besides that, the black market is thriving off of prohibition of marijuana. We wouldn't have the border violence in Mexico if it weren't for prohibition. Consider the prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s; it created enormous criminal syndicates that produced and sold alcohol off the grid. They caused violence in cities, and our police forces were devoted to capturing them, which was a complete waste of time that could have been avoided by not bothering to prohibit alcohol use.
If you can see the parallel in these two prohibition situations, then you should be able to see why marijuana should be legalized, both for our and our children's safety.
05:01 PM on 01/24/2012
"Legalizing" implies a certain degree of approval. "Decriminalizing" implies simply (with apologies to Pierre Trudeau) taking the state out of the living rooms of the nation. That's the way to go.
01:16 PM on 02/02/2012
So you think that we ought to leave a 100 billion dollar market intact, but that control of all the production and sales should remain in the hands of organized crime. Right.

How did that work out with Al Capone during alcohol prohibition?

And no, "legalization" doesn't imply approval of anything. It simply recognizes that the alternatives are well-known disasters. See alcohol for the best example of that.
01:36 PM on 01/24/2012
Actually Yoni, as a former teenager, I can tell you that getting dope was easy. Getting a six-pack was another story.
But yes, let's keep it illegal! There are few opportunities in this life to double your investment, but anyone can do just that by selling weed. And as long as it remains illegal, you can sell it anytime, day or night, Sundays, and to anyone with the cash. No ID required. If it were legal, you'd no doubt have to get a license, deal with all kinds of regulations and rules, and the profits probably wouldn't be what they are now.
04:25 PM on 01/23/2012
Hi Yoni,

You have a point, and yet the red light district in NL is not exemplatory of Dutch society as a whole. Statistics from De Groene Amsterdammer from 2011 show how marijuana use in the Netherlands (where it is legal) is half of what it is in Italy (where it is illegal).

I am not completely in favour of legalization, but the issue deserves more open discussion than it's currently given; and sorry, but your slightly trite comments add nothing to the debate.
01:12 PM on 01/23/2012
I was going to post about how poor this article is and how it makes no valid points for the argument. I see the comments below have that taken care of. I would suggest smoking some and thinking about why your arguments are what you have been told and not what you think judging by your actions.
12:09 PM on 01/23/2012
...Amsterdam's red light district is also a ridiculous and disingenuous comparison for the simple fact that it's a tourist destination. People come from all over the world to sample the things that are illegal everywhere else. And using the hackneyed cliche of the soulless stares of prostitutes is laughable. In fact, the stares of the prostitutes in Amsterdam, with their union, their proper health care, and what addictions they may be fighting out in the open, is downright alluring compared to the stares of the HIV and Hep C ravaged women selling themselves on the downtown east side here in Vancouver. You know, the place where drug addiction is treated as a criminal offense, and pot is illegal, thus driving these people and their desperation underground.

Finally, as long a pot's illegal, one can be pretty certain that when mr. harper has all his shiny new prisons built he's going to need to fill them with someone. After all, real crime is on the decline. Take a look to that obscene joke to the south of us if you want to see what happens when a country gets serious about "eliminating" drug use.

Rant over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tweed7t
wear sunscreen and dance
12:47 PM on 01/23/2012
far out, man!
12:08 PM on 01/23/2012
This piece is so shallow and poorly researched I don't know where to start, so how about with this one...

"If pot becomes legal, drug dealers won't sell it anymore... they'll be peddling harder stuff...like cocaine..."

Drug dealers ALREADY sell cocaine, and though Mr. Goldstein sort of debunks the "gateway drug" garbage, he then suggests that there is some truth to it (there isn't). Saying that marijuana is a gateway drug has about as much credence as saying that Coke is a gateway drink. After all, nearly everyone who has become an alcoholic drank Coke before they moved onto liquor.

Would legalizing pot cause an increase in use? In the short term, probably yes, simply because of the 'novelty' effect. But in the long term, use would not significantly increase. Doubt that? Ask ANYONE who doesn't currently smoke pot why they choose to refrain. The one answer you will NOT get is "because it's illegal". So, if we make it legal, how will that change things?
03:12 PM on 01/23/2012
Thanks for stating what I was thinking exactly. BTW - illegal is a sick bird, is it not? :-)
Thank God for intelligent people such as yourself Burt.
10:39 AM on 01/23/2012
Kids don't have access to pot? What planet are you on? Most poorly informed article ever. Let's make it a crime cos it stops the kids. Right. "For the children" ... That's why we sell cigarettes and booze as well.... you know ..... to keep the kids safe.