Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Yoni Goldstein
 

Quebecois Student Protesters Will Grow Out of It. They Always Do

Posted: 05/18/2012 11:07 am

The language with which the media have characterized the Quebec student strike, now in its 14th week (and perhaps on its last breath if Jean Charest goes through with legislation that would "suspend" it until late summer), is strikingly lacking. The most often used terms -- "student protest" and "tuition hike" -- ignore what is at the centre of strike. What is missing is the word "university" -- these are after all university students protesting university tuition hikes. The university part is in fact the key to the whole thing.

University students are weird specimens. They're old enough that we consider them adults but they are still, basically, kids. One minute we've got them imprisoned in a strictly regimented life of school and family and friends, and the next they're out on their own at institutions that are pretty much the antithesis of real life, and that have virtually no rules. And the only other people around them are thousands and thousands of more kids. It's crazy when you stop and think about it.

Going to university is like hitting the snooze button on life: you do whatever you want whenever you want, and there are no consequences (or at least there's no one there to call your attention to them). It's a vacation that lasts four years -- or more if you manage to wrangle an invitation to the grad school after-party.

And there's also learning to be done.

If you had to boil down what universities teach to two words, they'd be "critical thinking" -- a loaded term to be sure, but which, at its most basic level, means questioning everything. University students just eat this up: for many, this is their first time away from home, their community, their comfort zone. They are being taught to be critical of everything by professors who are critical of everything. You can smell the scent of rebellion (mixed with stale beer and pot smoke) from a mile away.

This is all well and good (broadening your horizons and such) but there's a flaw in the brand of critical thinking universities teach. On the first day of Critical Thinking 101 elbow-patched profs exhort students to challenge everything they've ever been taught before. This is music to the ears of the typical freshman -- an invitation to mutinee. And from there it's but an easy step to embracing ideological formulations -- in the current age, postmodernism and its various philosophical offspring -- that are pretty much the direct opposite of what regular people think and do.

The problem is that the critical thinking being taught is not self-perpetuating -- that is, no one tells university students to think critically about critical thinking. Students get so caught up in the inherent sexiness of doing everything they haven't been doing until now that they fail to recognize the academic world is as rigid and exclusionary as the real world.

You need to get out of university to learn that lesson.

And that's the good news -- that the malady is only temporary. It takes leaving university and entering true adulthood to recognize -- and it doesn't happen overnight -- that scholars are as blinkered and priggish as everyone else. Slowly, as the fog of university is replaced by real life, one begins to realize there's a lot of good in the regular ways most people live. Rebellion, it turns out, isn't a very functional credo, more the kind of thing you indulge in on summer long weekends.

Most of the kids -- and it's important to remember that we're talking about kids here -- on strike in Quebec, demonstrating in the streets, wearing their little red thingies, are going to turn out just fine. They'll be perfectly normal citizens who work hard to make an honest living, and they'll be wiser for the university experience too, because when you set aside the ideological pretentiousness, universities do teach a lot of useful stuff, and foster personal growth that serves young people well as they enter the job market and seek out suitable mates.

Sure, a few of these protesters will never grow out of the university faze. They'll keep railing against "the man" and "the system" until they're blue in the face. Or, if they're really crazy, they'll become the next generation of professors and academics. Either way, they'll be perfectly harmless. They'll serve as a constant reminder to the rest of us of the good times we once had in university, and the even better times we have after it's over.

 

Follow Yoni Goldstein on Twitter: www.twitter.com/yonigoldstein

FOLLOW CANADA
The language with which the media have characterized the Quebec student strike, now in its 14th week (and perhaps on its last breath if Jean Charest goes through with legislation that would "suspend" ...
The language with which the media have characterized the Quebec student strike, now in its 14th week (and perhaps on its last breath if Jean Charest goes through with legislation that would "suspend" ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 40
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:30 PM on 05/21/2012
As a parent I feel I have a responsibility to make sure that my children don't learn from the same places as their sad peers. I won't contribute to a University education unless its for something real that creates something. I'd rather give my kids the money to open a business and watch them learn from that. The last thing the world needs is more social workers and web designers.
05:59 PM on 05/20/2012
Speaking as one non-elbow patched academic in Montreal, your argument is idiotic. Universities are as much about "real life" as any other kind of place. The students' profs are not a daft bunch of ideologues all on the sides of the students. Why presume that? If students are shielded from the pressures of working life, that too is an experiment in how to be in the world (an experiment in "real" living). "Critical thinking" (one cliched buzz word that I, for one, never use) is in any case not a bland injunction to question everything, but an effort to question specific power structures as they infringe upon people's everyday lives. I may be puzzled by the intensity of the students' fury, but I do think that they have a legitimate right to protest (provided it is peaceful).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
02:06 PM on 05/20/2012
That definition of critical thinking is waaay off the target. It is not about criticising as much as examining information. Here are some key factors involved: clarity, accuracy, precision, consistency, relevance, sound evidence, good reasons, depth, breadth, and fairness.
THis article is lacking quite a few.
11:15 AM on 05/20/2012
What a patronizing article. Only people who fail to grow up protest against the system? So, when the multinational corporations exert undue influence on governments, who then impose policies on the citizens that many consider are not in the best interest of those citizens, only the immature will protest? "Slowly, ... one begins to realize there's a lot of good in the regular ways most people live." in this particular situation I guess you are referring to the large debt levels of most people? considering that is one of the main points of this protest. Perhaps everything is not so wonderful for the majority of Canadians,right now, and perhaps speaking up against the ideological mindset that enriches the wealthy while reducing the social benefits to the majority of citizens is a thoughtful and mature action. for more background information on this issue, you might want to read these articles.
http://andrewgavinmarshall.com/2012/04/24/canadas-economic-collapse-and-social-crisis-class-war-and-the-college-crisis-part-5/
10:07 AM on 05/20/2012
I'm sorry, Yoni, but you're selling Canada's youth short. Most are far more cognizant than you give them credit for, have already applied critical thought well before entering post-secondary studies, and continue to evolve their views while in university... And usually without the express input of professors, who typically ignore such "fluff" in favor of a regimented push of their own curriculum.

And, oh yes, while it is a vacation for some, others take it as the serious prerequisite for many professions that it is. The same is true of these protests... A shouting match for some, a serious direct political action for others. And just like university, it behooves us to weed out the serious crowd to listen to their concerns, rather than focus on the yahoos.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dennis Schmunk
01:57 PM on 05/19/2012
What Mr Goldstein neglects to mention is that protesters and those who remain a-political are already adults who make choices in response to the governments that presume to lead.

This was true during the Vietnam war protests and also true when the democratically elected Allende government was overthrown by Kissinger and the CIA.

Mr. Goldstein might have us believe that only elections are legitimate to a matured democratic populace while violence remains the perogative of the elites who wish to maintain control. Idealistic youth is often the first to see the hypocricy. Surrendering to a rigged election process is often just cowardice or apathy; not a sign of maturity.

A belief that only the ballot represents legitimate change is also naive to the possible reactions such change brings like the Pinochet/Nixon/Kissinger repsonse back then or the orchestrated radicalization of the right in the USA today.

In short both the electoral process and popular revolt are legimate choices available to a free people. It is the response of the elites that decides whether the process is violent or reasonable
11:56 AM on 05/19/2012
Usually people wait until they're about . . . oh . . in their hundreds before they become this pompous.
photo
1846
Deir Yassin Survivor
02:54 AM on 05/19/2012
I guess we should ask the police to respond to fire bombing, assaults, intimidaiton and property damage with hugs and kisses.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thalin Lea
12:20 AM on 05/19/2012
this is not one of your best posting mr. Goldstein , and by saying it, i'm not defending the students movement , neither the government's position. It is just a matter of appreciation for what we have . But today it seems everybody wants to take advantage on everybody , what a selfish society . Government doesn't want to recognize its wrong doings , students don't want to give up on their vicious likes, and you are Dear Yoni just trying to take advantage of this situation for a piece of attention. With all the respect every single part deserve.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:58 PM on 05/18/2012
Yoni Goldstein,

totally awesome name...is your husband`s name Lingham?

Anyhew, it's nice seeing Canadians standing up for themselves for a change :3
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
10:00 PM on 05/19/2012
I don't think Mr Goldstein's semi-education in right wing sophistry included lessons in Sanskrit or Hinduism, so that was entirely lost on him I'm sure.......
07:14 PM on 05/18/2012
I am a student. I am 39 years old. Many leading the charge around me are older than I am, or just a bit younger be they students OR professors. This is condescending.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KenKo
09:30 AM on 05/20/2012
It's only condescending because the truth stings. A student at 39? Hmmm...sheltering from adulthood is a numbing exercise.
10:44 AM on 05/20/2012
One CAN return to studies to change their focus or upgrade. I used to work in a bank. Many are being laid off and the government keeps telling people....upgrade, go back to school....what world do you live in? What narrow definition of adulthood you must have to claim that being a student at 39 is sheltering anyone from 'adulthood'. There are many 'mature students' out there, and they tend to be the better students, to boot. Have you ever heard of lifelong learning, which is necessary in this modern economy? Why not make it accessible?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
01:54 PM on 05/20/2012
Some people return later in life to expand their horizons, upgrade their career qualifications, shift their career focus--everyone has his/her own personal reason.
I'm not particularly on board with this student protest at this juncture either. It is now about something else.IMHO of course.
06:59 PM on 05/18/2012
This is just a bunch of generalizations that apply to artsy fartsy students, but much less so for students actually studying to learn a profession. The media blindly assumes students generally support the "strike" because of misleading vote stats (What percentage of students actually voted), or video of huge turnouts that include as many anarchists, union members, looky loos, etc., as students. I saw one interview where the protester revealed at the end of the interview that he went to McMaster 10 years ago.
The Montreal students I know aren't striking. Meanwhile, their "leaders" are now complaining that the government doesn't have the right to stop them from stopping real students from getting an education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
see-ellen2001
05:04 PM on 05/18/2012
There also CEGEP college students protesting, i believe, at least in Gatineau.
11:45 PM on 05/18/2012
Yup and CGEP is free, so who knows what they are protesting
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WoolyBumblebee
Creator of TruthAndOblivion.com
04:28 AM on 05/19/2012
Psst... CEGEP students go to Uni after they finish. Or did you not understand that part?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
see-ellen2001
12:42 PM on 05/19/2012
The CEGEP students do have a sake in it bcs they often go on to university afterwards. CEGEP is structured to be the place between high school and university.
05:03 PM on 05/18/2012
And if the students flunk out, they can become a columnist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Watkins
Ă€ Rebours
06:40 AM on 05/19/2012
..or fail to read the exact same comment from 5 hours earlier.
11:50 AM on 05/22/2012
Feel free to blame the 5-plus hour delay on comments being approved.