Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Zach Paikin

GET UPDATES FROM Zach Paikin
 

Harper Will Keep Playing Dirty, So Long as we Let Him

Posted: 02/28/2012 10:57 am

Last election, the ballot question effectively crafted by Stephen Harper was one that presented a dichotomy in electoral choice -- between a strong, stable Conservative majority government, or a "reckless coalition" of left-wing parties.

Underlying that question, however, was a more profound message: The Conservative party won its majority by gambling that Canadians didn't care about what goes on in the Ottawa bubble, appealing to them on economic issues instead.

Here's the problem: Harper's gamble paid off. Most Canadians don't care about what happens in Ottawa. And that's a problem.

Harper's government was the first in Canadian history to unilaterally shut down Parliament through prorogation in order to circumvent a confidence motion it was certain to lose. His was the first in the history of the Commonwealth to be found in contempt of Parliament.

The list goes on: the in-and-out scandal, former Harper adviser Bruce Carson being convicted five times of fraud, the Helena Guergis and Bev Oda affairs, and the Muskoka G-8 scandal. All this and more took place during or before the election campaign of 2011.

Canadians still rewarded Stephen Harper's Conservatives with a majority government. And now the Tories think they can get away with anything.

The tragic lesson of modern Canadian politics is clear: Parliamentary crime pays.

Since the election, we've seen more. Calls were made by the Conservative party to Liberal MP Irwin Cotler's constituents to spread false rumours of his impending retirement. Closure on parliamentary debate has been invoked at an unprecedented level -- 13 times since the election and seven times in seven weeks this past fall.

Liberal policies were equated with Nazism. Opposition members were told that opposing the government's internet privacy bill would be equivalent to supporting child pornography.

And now, news has emerged of a voter-suppression scandal. Allegedly, Liberal and NDP supporters in at least 34 ridings were either harassed or misled with regards to their polling station information, although it has yet to be completely proven beyond doubt that Conservative operatives were behind this.

This ends-justify-the-means style of politics is unbecoming of a Canadian government. The Liberals yelled and screamed last election about the abuse of democracy -- urging Canadians to "rise up" -- to no avail.

The Liberal party clearly identified the problem. Now it needs to come up with the solution -- a way of beating the Harper Conservatives in the next election. That means articulating a coherent vision for the country and messaging it effectively to Canadians -- the politics of hope at its finest.

Stephen Harper won the 2011 election by playing to the public's disengagement with politics. That is perhaps what is most regrettable -- not simply that Harper's Conservatives have abused democracy but that Canadians don't care about these abuses.

Yet Harper's majority wasn't the only story of the last election. The rise of Jack Layton's NDP also took place, for they were able to articulate a vision for the country (albeit one that many Canadians disagreed with) and message it effectively. Perhaps even more importantly, they portrayed considerable authenticity in the process.

Canadians are looking to be inspired. They aren't naturally turned off by politics. Rather, their current increased apathy is due to the behaviour of politicians themselves.

Thanks to effective fundraising and communications -- among other things -- the Tories have created a battlefield in which personal attacks and the politics of fear reign supreme. As a result, the public becomes increasingly disengaged, which in turn benefits the Conservatives once again -- it's a vicious cycle.

Sun Tzu was adamant in stating that one should never engage one's enemy on their battlefield of choice. The challenge for Liberals starting now will be to create a new political battlefield -- an arena in which the Liberal party positions itself above partisan politics and articulates a vision that puts the long-term future of Canada and Canadians first.

 

Follow Zach Paikin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@zpaikin

FOLLOW CANADA
 
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:05 PM on 03/03/2012
This was good but barely scratched the surface. You forgot about all the ignoring of science and trying to pass damaging bills that have been criticized by just about everyone apart from the CPC caucus themselves.
02:51 PM on 03/01/2012
after reading many comments i really why people seem to be deflecting harpers past and current arragant attitude to past liberal govt's ,.this man has stayed in power by any means possible and he will continue ...mark my words
photo
Add In Canadia
Egotism is a weakness
04:07 AM on 03/01/2012
I reserve my judgement till there's actual evidence that the Conservatives were directly responsible for the robocalls. Personally I think an investigation does need to happen, and that the Conservatives would be wise to welcome it with open arms instead of brushing it aside.

The reason why we're in this position right now is because the Liberals were playing just as dirty not that long ago, which is why they're in 3rd party status now. It didn't help that the was NDP crippled by the death of Layton. As such there is no effective opposition to actually stand up against the Conservatives.

Even if an election was to be thrown right now, we'd just end up with yet another Conservative minority government with still an ineffectual opposition, or perhaps still a majority because of the conflict between the NDP and Liberals. The left is just self-cannibalizing at this point.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dale Chan
Hope is both panacea and poison.
02:46 AM on 03/01/2012
In a Democracy, the people get the government they deserve.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sonoffestus
Got smart & got out!
07:37 PM on 03/01/2012
Yup, lazy and indifferent leads to Conservative rule.
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
11:42 AM on 02/29/2012
sign up here

http://www.leadnow.ca/robocall-fraud
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
04:30 PM on 02/29/2012
Done...thanks John
11:10 AM on 02/29/2012
perhaps the author should stop blaming the tories for winning an election, but rather at the alternative they were offering at the time ..canadians simply didn't want to vote for a quasi-american refugee...
thankfully today is a different day and it's safe to say that many tories are embarrassed and sad
i don't rejoice in harper's folly, i'm not mad either...i'm in shock...
10:54 PM on 02/29/2012
I think it's telling that a Canadian can go away to two of the most prestigious universities in the world, acclaimed as a professor who specializes in issues of political ethics, and when he returns home to run, the public easily buys into the idea that he's "quasi-american". Particularly when contrasted with Stephen Harper who, in 1997, was the guest speaker at a convention held by a think-tank of the religious right wing behind the Republican party. They'd convened in Montreal to avoid the media attention. In his speech, Harper panned Canada, and praised the extreme right neo-conservative viewpoint as the one he emulates.

But it was Ignatieff who was the 'American' candidate. There were many reasons to criticize each of the parties in the last election, but that one has to be the most sadly laughable of all. 'Sadly' because people bought into it without questioning the source.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dale Chan
Hope is both panacea and poison.
02:43 AM on 03/01/2012
Ad hominems work wonders in politics. Why argue policy when you can score big with the voters by making them despise the "quasi-american"?
03:01 AM on 02/29/2012
OOps correction see 39% where I say 29%,my apologies...
02:58 AM on 02/29/2012
While I agree there is a certain passivity to Canadians when it comes to these sort of things, I disagree with your interpretation of the last election. While yes the Tories got a majority but only with 29% of the vote, and when you include all those who chose not to vote(40%) it boils down to a measly 19% of Canadians gave Harper a majority. Wait a minute, we gotta include the abstainers as well, they too bare a certain responsibility for Harper's majority, whether they intended too or not. But I am sure it is probably fair to say that most of the abstainers didn't want Harper either. So, really what this is, is an indictment of the Canadian electoral syatem where a minority of the population end up decided who rules over the majority.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
11:40 AM on 02/29/2012
The idea that the abstainers "didn't want Harper either" is completely out of line. The abstainers didn't care! A significant proportion of them couldn't name the leaders of the parties running, and were simply too comfortable and apathetic (under a Conservative gov't) to get off their butts and vote. This is borne out by the fact that high turn-outs usually eject the incumbents from office......if they wanted Harper out, they would have voted.

Now, as for his majority....this is typical of Canadian politics. Chretien won three majorities.....with 41.2%, 38.4%, and 40.8%.......of the 13 majority gov'ts since 1945, only TWO won more than 50%, the PCs in 1958 and in 1984. The Liberals ruled 44 out of those 66 years and NOT ONCE got more than 50% of the vote.

That is the way FPTP works. It is Canadian democracy until we change it....and it is fully legitimate as such......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:11 AM on 02/29/2012
I'm a Canadian and I do care what happens in Ottawa and the rest of Canada and you can be damn sure I didn't vote for the bunch of gestapo clowns they have there now. But then again, the Liberals aren't much better. The biggest problem in Canada is the electoral system we have in place. It needs to be overhauled to better reflect who it is exactly we want in office, not just the MP whose riding you live in.
photo
Another Pesky Canadian
Talk - action = 0
10:12 AM on 02/29/2012
Exactly.

The British Parliamentary system began with the signing of the Magna Carta in the 1200's, and
First past the Post has suited the aristocrats and monied elite just fine for centuries.

Surely it's time for a system that better represents those it pretends to serve.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:04 AM on 02/29/2012
I am totally convinced , nothing will happen, because our electoral laws are so weak. The ultimate punishment demands individuals to impress a judge for by-elections,but judges fear neocon crypto fascists much more than heroes bound to be ridiculed for merely believing Canada a great country. The ultimate cons, having attained power by money, with no shortage of resources and contacts, enabling then and now the vile to help win the ultimate majority prize, are not worried at all. Who will dare to believe take stressful steps and face our judicial system with honest confidence that there will be of a fair hearing? Since no one is openly indulging in doing so, all is lost again in the vast play of uninspired words drubbed down by repetition, guaranteed by a media in love with decisiveness and corporate tax cuts. This scandal will die a slow but certain death by boredom since none have a great deal of faith in any of our political institutions when it pertains to doing the right thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tokenblackman
10:22 PM on 02/28/2012
Do you ever listen to Conservatives talk? It is all about being a true believer to the cause. It does not matter that Conservatives polices do not work in the long run. You think things are bad now, just wait 2 years from now when the "Dumb on Crime" legislation and the F-35 jets true cost come into focus. I for one can't wait to tell my conservatives friends I told you so.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sonoffestus
Got smart & got out!
07:48 PM on 03/01/2012
They will blame it on the Left and folks will believe them. The Left does not know how to communicate, the Right does propaganda and they do it well.

The first 52 years of my life was spent in the States, the rest will be in Canada as a Canadian Citizen...................I know how this picture ends, it is not pretty.

Conservatives bleed and mislead nations...........................SOF.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
08:46 PM on 02/28/2012
Wow!
Look at all the 39%ers wiggle out of their holes to defend the indefensible.
08:14 PM on 02/28/2012
Where oh where were all these sanctimoniuos observers of what is right and wrong in the world before Stephen Harper? Where were they when Jean Chretien virtually ruined the head of the BDC because he wouldn't ok a loan to Jean's criminal friend? Why aren't they clamouring for the return of over 40 million stolen dollars? Are we to believe that the only evil person in Canada is Stephen Harper? We are doing very well indeed in comparison to most of the world, isn't Harper doing something right? Goodness, we're being fed one "scandal" after another and when it's proven wrong, there's no apology, just another "insult to democracy". What the heck is wrong in this country? We are becoming very American with all this gotcha stuff.
09:55 PM on 02/28/2012
If you can explain how it would do any good to rail against former Prime Ministers who no longer control the ebb and flow of politics in the nation, I'll be glad to take a pot shot in that direction. It's been years, but my dislike for Bill Graham and John MacCallum is still strong, despite the Liberals not having been in power for a long time.

But this "Chretien was bad!" mentality stuns me. It's like watching little kids point at one another and chirp "but he did it, too!" That shouldn't matter. This is something people should have learned in Kindergarten: just because one child does a bad thing, doesn't mean it's okay for you to do bad things, too. Our problem is that we've been failing to punish politicians who transgress. Right now, the transgressors we need to worry most about are those who have destroyed the integrity of conservatism in Canada. They should have set an example. Instead, they've sullied what was noble under better men.
photo
Another Pesky Canadian
Talk - action = 0
10:14 AM on 02/29/2012
Re: "...they've sullied what was noble under better men."

...and women.

Fanned and faved, thank you.
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
04:33 PM on 02/29/2012
Well said!
photo
Voltage
You can't spell Canada without "eh."
09:27 AM on 02/29/2012
You're right. Chretien and his cronies did some bad stuff. And we spanked them hard, kicking them out of Parliament--big-time.

So now that I've allowed you your "Well they were bad, too" how can you actually defend the illegal and immoral actions of Canada's own NeoCons?

And "gotcha?" C'mon, let's not bring Sarah Palin's catchphrases into the Canadian conversation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hal Wood
07:53 PM on 02/28/2012
Anyone who has had anything to do with politics must realize dirty acts are common. Even going door to door voters from different parties will delay and obstruct the door knockers from reaching out to as many people as they can. Anyone who did not vote because of this was not intelligent enough to be voting . I have a very hard time with the Liberals and NDP being so self rightuous when it has been revealed about their dirty tricks recently. A few years ago a citizen sued a politition for lying to the voters and breaking promises, the judge ruled anyone who belives polititions does not understand politics and he dismissed the case.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:33 PM on 02/28/2012
"The challenge for Liberals starting now will be to create a new political battlefield -- an arena in which the Liberal party positions itself above partisan politics"
Digging up your political opponents divorce records and posting them on twitter is a good start.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
09:10 PM on 02/28/2012
not sure you understand the definition of partisan...