SUBSCRIBE AND FOLLOW
Get top stories and blog posts emailed to me each day. Newsletters may offer personalized content or advertisements. Learn more
(Photo: Justin Tang/Canadian Press)
NDP strategists point to two factors they think helped catapult them ahead of the Liberals and into a head-to-head contest with the Tories in the polls: Trudeau’s parliamentary support for the anti-terrorism bill – C-51 – and the Alberta election.
C-51 was a gift that allowed the NDP to express and repeat criticisms about Trudeau’s leadership — that he was cynical, unprincipled, and weak — that the party had been itching to get out but hadn’t had an opportunity.
“C-51 became an issue about leadership as much as it was about civil liberties,” Lavigne said. “Mulcair opposed the bill because it was flawed, despite its initial popularity. Trudeau [supported] the bill because it was popular, despite its flaws.”
Trudeau did himself no favours by telling a UBC crowd that his position might have been different if it weren’t an election year.
“Tom is a leader who not only knows where he stands but has the courage to back up his convictions with action, and there is no better example of this than the leadership he has shown on Bill C-51,” NDP Scarborough Centre candidate Alex Wilson said last month to a cheering rally in Scarborough, Ont.
“It is a failure of leadership to say you oppose Bill C-51 and then support it, only because you are afraid Stephen Harper will criticize you for it,” NDP candidate Mary Fowler of Oshawa added.
The Liberals say their polling suggests the NDP’s attacks about C-51 didn’t move many votes. But it did give Mulcair an opportunity to lump the Liberals in with the Tories. Public opinion polls show support for C-51 dropped in April, months before the Tory attack ad, or the NDP’s sharp rise in the polls.
Two Factors That Helped:
C-51 And The Alberta Election
(Photo: Graham Hughes/Canadian Press)
'A lot of people say C-51, but I don’t believe it,” Mainstreet pollster Quito Maggi told HuffPost about the factors behind the Liberals’ slide in the polls. “I really think it’s the attack ads.”
In polling he conducted, most of the people who had seen the Conservatives’ “Just Not Ready” ad multiple times — perhaps so many times that they couldn’t recall the precise number — reported the strongest support for the Conservative party at 46 per cent, he said.
“The Liberal drop is 100 per cent tied to the attack ads, and the effect it is had on people’s opinions of Justin Trudeau,” Maggi said.
Trudeau’s decline in the polls made Mulcair the default alternative to Harper, he said. But when you look at the strength of the NDP support, it’s weak, he said, with a lot of apparent NDP voters open to the possibility of switching sides.
“A lot of people don’t want to vote Conservative, and now that the ads have told them Justin is just not ready, what is the default third option? It’s the NDP,” Maggi said.
“Not to diminish the NDP or Tom Mulcair, but I think it’s a parked vote,” he added. “It doesn’t mean it’s staying. It’s just parked. And it could solidify.”
Mulcair wasn’t too far behind Harper as the leader respondents felt would be the best manager for the economy, Maggi noted. “Stuff like that can take that parked vote say, “ we are staying; we are not just visiting,” he added.
Several Liberals have acknowledged off the record that the Tory ads have hurt.
“[The NDP’s] strategy is to stay out of the way while the Tories blow our brains out and be the only ones left standing,” one Liberal said.
Broadhurst, the Liberals’ national director, is more understated. The ad is everywhere but it isn’t going to do permanent damage, he said.
“The size of the ad buy was enormous, so even if you weren’t paying attention to politics, it would have been difficult if you owned a television set to miss it over the past little while,” Broadhurst said. “Fortunately, there is time to correct it.”
Lacking the cash to fight back in June, the Liberals are now devoting significant resources to countering the message. They will release television spots this week that have a confident Trudeau telling the audience why he thinks he’s ready to lead.
The Attack Ad Factor
Yaroslav Baran, a senior communications advisor for three Conservative election campaigns, told HuffPost the Tory ad against Trudeau is quite successful because it is based on a pre-existing notions voters have about Trudeau. “It’s respectful, it doesn’t beat up on him,” Baran said. “But it homes right in to that issue of experience … Mr. Trudeau’s weakness.” Tim Powers, the managing partner of polling firm Abacus Data and a frequent Conservative commentator, said the ads helped make Trudeau appear wanting when compared with Mulcair. “It has helped knock the Liberals back,” he said. “The challenge is you don’t want to knock the living daylights out of him, either.” Carson agrees. The Tories’ strategy depends on splitting the vote between the NDP and Liberal parties, but the ads may have been too helpful to the NDP — creating a one-on-one fight with the Tory leader. “I know the prime minister wants to decimate the Liberal party. But you don’t decimate the Liberal party to your own disadvantage,” he said. “If you need the splits to win, you need to make sure that the two opposition parties are almost equal so that the split occurs,” he said. “I know they think they can win a battle with the NDP, but I’m not sure they are right.”
Carson thinks the Liberals’ first error was miscalculating the importance of public policy. For more than a year, Trudeau offered no specifics, saying he was listening to Canadians. He said he wanted to invest in education and infrastructure. Then he announced plans to legalize and regulate marijuana. While Mulcair announced specific policies, including a national daycare program, Trudeau sat on the sidelines.
“I think there was a miscalculation that he didn’t need policy to back up the hope-y change-y stuff. I think he did. And I think there was a contrast built with him and the other two leaders,” Carson told HuffPost.
Then there were the-often-alluded-to gaffes: a flippant comment about the phallic CF-18 fighter jets that Harper wanted to send to bomb ISIS, jokes about Chinese dictatorial efficiency and Russian aggression towards Ukraine. Internally, Trudeau’s unplanned public pronouncement that only pro-choice candidates were welcome in his party also caused headaches. Some nomination battles turned ugly, and a handful of lawsuits ensued. Trudeau’s refusal to back the military mission against the Islamic State also riled some in the party. Then, like the NDP, the Liberals were thrown off the economic message they wanted to stress because of the Parliament Hill shooting on Oct. 22 and the sexual harassment complaints in November against two Grit MPs.
The Liberals Struggle To Find Their Footing
In February, Trudeau got off to a better start, receiving positive reviews from those in attendance at the Petroleum Club in Calgary for his approach to dealing with greenhouse gases and provincial innovation. Then he flew to Ottawa to announce that he was welcoming the bête noire of the Conservatives, Eve Adams, into the Liberal party, along with her fiancé, Tory operative Dimitri Soudas. Trudeau, the candidate who had promised to do politics differently, said wonderful things about a woman most regarded as a prima donna and a Conservative problem.
(Photo: Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)
Broadhurst, the Liberals’ national director, said he thinks the Tories know Trudeau is the biggest threat to their continued existence as a government. A lot of the seats the Tories need to keep are traditionally Liberal seats, Conservatives sources acknowledged.
“He is not just the flip side of the Harper coin. He is not just another career politician [like Mulcair] who does politics the same way, with negative advertising,” Broadhurst said. Trudeau embodies change, he said.
Polls are meaningless, Broadhurst added. “Go ask premiers Dix and Hudak how important polls a few months before an election campaign [are],” he said jokingly. Former B.C. NDP leader Adrian Dix and Ontario Progressive Conservative leader Tim Hudak were riding high in the polls and were expecting to become premier before going down to crushing defeats in the actual elections.
“This map is so dynamic right now that I think there are areas in play for all the parties that people would not have traditionally thought of,” he added.
After 9½ years of Conservative government, Broadhurst said, people are ready to move on. “People are testing the waters,” he said. “We really did anticipate that, I don’t think anyone really thought this was going to be a cakewalk.”
“We feel that we are offering a plan that is going to resonate with folks, and we think that the NDP aren’t putting out much of a plan at all,” Broadhurst said. “This campaign is going to matter.”
The Conservatives’ game plan was to scare voters off Trudeau with ads suggesting he isn’t ready to govern — just as they had successfully done against former Liberal leaders Stéphane Dion and Michael Ignatieff. Then, the Tories would tell those voters who were itching for change that Mulcair would be a worse bet than another few years of Harper.
“A national election is not a popularity contest,” Harper told reporters assembled outside Rideau Hall on Sunday morning as he announced the 11-week campaign. It’s a “serious choice.”
“It's an election about who will protect our economy in a period of ongoing global instability and secure Canada's future prosperity, and it is an election about who is best equipped to make the tough calls to keep our country safe,” Harper said.
The Conservatives' Game Plan
(Photo: Mario Beauregard/The Canadian Press)
Instead, Harper stressed the insecurity of the global economy, Europe’s debt crisis, and China’s downturn. Despite poll after poll suggesting a huge appetite for change – somewhere about the 70 per cent mark – pollster Maggi said the economy is also people’s top priority. “Everybody is now talking about a recession,” he said. “People are looking at the Greek vote, the Chinese stock market, and I think when people see that they get spooked. “All those things combined — the Bank of Canada dropping interest rates, talks about deficit budgets — that moves people back towards safety. And the safe bet is the Conservative government right now. “Change is great, but it can also be scary,” he said. “So if we are going into another rough patch, better safe than taking a chance on change.” If all this sounds familiar, it’s because it is. The Tories’ 2011 election strategy was also built around campaigning on strong economic stewardship amid uncertain times and scaring middle-of-the-road voters into casting ballots for Tory candidates — rather than risk having a spendthrift NDP government. Harper insiders, all of whom would speak only on condition of anonymity, believe Canadians won’t hold the prime minister responsible for outside world events, the drop in oil prices or the shrinking economy. If Statistics Canada reports on Sept. 1 that the economy has contracted again for the second quarter in row, and the country is in a technical recession, the Tories might actually be able to benefit by suggesting that now is not the time for risk. If the election is about who can best manage the economy, the Tories believe they’ll win. “If you put yourself forward, as the best party, on the most important issue, then you sort of win by default,” Baran, the former Conservative strategist, said. Baran also believes a negative GDP number would be drowned out by other economic numbers, such as good job figures and positive growth projections. “Who do you want to go for? The guy who isn’t ready? The guy who is a risk? Or the guy who has done the job before? That is the questions they are setting up,” Powers told HuffPost last week. On Tuesday, the party released an ad framing the ballot question around the economy precisely that way.
“The wrong leader could do real harm,” a dark and gloomy voice states in the ad. “Justin thinks budgets balance themselves.” What about Thomas Mulcair? “He and the NDP would wreck our economy.” “The Conservatives want the ballot questions to be — almost a repeat of 2011 — capable leadership in uncertain times. The man with a plan,” Powers added.
If it worked in 2011, what’s to say it can’t work again? Chambers, Mulcair’s friend and advisor, thinks it won’t because the Tories, after nine years in office, are coming to the end of their natural life in government. “I think they have really scared a large part of the population because they are really committed to their extreme right-wing agenda,” he said. The pragmatic voters who gave Harper his majority won’t return to him if they are given a credible alternative, he said. That’s where the NDP is focused, making Mulcair and the party appear ready to govern. Responsible. Reliable. Safe. “Fundamentally, I don’t think you can look at Tom Mulcair and think he is a wild and crazy guy,” Chambers said. The Liberals, on the other hand, believe their challenge lies in making Harper wear the economic downturn. “When the plan isn’t working, sticking with the status quo is the real risk,” a Liberal source told HuffPost. “And if we know anything about Harper, it is that he will never change. Ever.” If the Liberals can make that point over and over again, maybe they stand a chance. “We are where we are because we have had an economic plan that for 10 years was based on the premise that you grow the economy based on giving more to wealthy people. And we think you grow the economy by strengthening the middle class,” the Liberal said. The NDP also plans to hammer the Tories on that front. “Mr. Harper has the worst economic growth record of any prime minister since 1960,” Mulcair declared Sunday at his launch speech in Gatineau, Que. Canada’s economy has shrunk for the past five months, he said. Many believe the country is already in recession. “Clearly, Mr. Harper your plan isn’t working,” Mulcair said. So will the Liberals’ narrative help the NDP or will the NDP’s help the Liberals? Too early to tell.
The Conservatives still have an easier path to victory than any of their opponents.
What Will More Scrutiny Of The NDP Bring?
Carson, the former Harper advisor, suggested the Conservatives could get another majority as long as the other parties don’t bite into their electoral coalition from 2011.
“If the splits don’t materialize and you end up with Mulcair mania kind of thing, then they are real trouble. But it’s early,” he said.
The NDP, according to Carson and most political observers HuffPost spoke with, has the second-easiest path. They will need to keep their seats in Quebec — something that has preoccupied Mulcair and to which the NDP has devoted significant resources since the 2011 breakthrough win. There is also growth potential in Ontario, where they have some support and in B.C., where the party is polling ahead of the Tories.
The Liberals have the hardest road to 24 Sussex Dr.
“The Liberals have a real problem. There aren’t that many seats in Atlantic Canada. They have strength in Quebec and in Ontario,” he said. “But beyond that it’s hard to see where the Liberals could pick up many more seats.” There are a handful in B.C. and the urban west, such as Calgary, Edmonton and Winnipeg. The landscape could change, however. Maggi, the pollster, notes that among declared Liberal and NDP supporters, almost 60 per cent of those surveyed are open to voting for the other party. The Tories aren’t writing Trudeau off and neither should the public. “I think anybody can come back,” said former Conservative staffer Adam Taylor, who is volunteering on the Tory campaign. But for now, at least, Mulcair seems to be the agent of change — the person voters might coalesce around if they want to boot out the Tories. That comes with its own set of challenges. “His problem now is going to be, what kind of campaign do you run?” Carson said. Do you run a front-runner’s campaign, which is safe and designed not to lose, or do you run a campaign designed to win? “He’s not that far ahead, so he has to be careful about what he does.” If he were working for Mulcair, Carson said, he would be concerned with whether the party’s policies stand up to scrutiny. “For example, his child care policy makes no sense at all. It is based on the provinces’ paying a good part of it, and it’s a great theoretical proposal to deal with childcare across the country. However, the implementation of it will be a nightmare, because the provinces have no money,” he said. “It doesn’t sound like Notley is going to buy in, and it doesn’t sound like Manitoba would buy in immediately — and these are the NDP provinces.”
(Photo: Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)
Now in the lead, Mulcair finds himself under attack from the Tories, the Liberals and the Bloc Québécois.
The Bloc Québécois wants to paint Mulcair is a hypocrite who says one thing in English Canada and another in francophone Quebec. Gilles Duceppe’s best lines of attack so far has been Mulcair’s shifting policy on the Energy East pipeline — the cornerstone of NDP energy policy in English Canada but a reason for expressing concern in Quebec, where the pipeline is unpopular.
It is not the only example. Mulcair also said, in French, on the eve of the anniversary of the École Polytechnique massacre that he would bring back the gun registry. Later – pushed by his rural MPs – Mulcair said in English that the NDP has no such plans.
The Liberals want to showcase Mulcair as weak on national unity and the NDP as cynical and disingenuous by pointing out that the party’s proposals won’t help all the people who think they’ll reap benefits.
“The NDP will talk about its plan to increase the minimum wage, and yet they won’t tell you their plan won’t help 99 per cent of people who earn the minimum wage in this country,” Trudeau said on Sunday. It won’t help servers, hotel receptionists, garage attendants or cashiers, he said. “Tom Mulcair’s plan will not give them an extra cent, because it only applies to people under federal regulations…. They’ll give false hope to people who work hard.”
He said “the NDP’s other answer for everything is to make the company you work for pay more in taxes. That means fewer jobs and less investment; all while our economy is stalled. The NDP would put the brakes on the economy at the worst possible time. “The NDP will talk about helping the middle class, but they won’t raise taxes on the wealthiest Canadians, and Mr. Mulcair won’t cut taxes to the middle class.”
Before the campaign began, Trudeau had been attacking Mulcair for the NDP’s Sherbrooke Declaration, a document that says the NDP would negotiate with Quebec separatists if they won a referendum with 50 per cent plus one vote. Trudeau’s Liberals are staunch defenders of the Clarity Act — a document that says the House of Commons will decide what the majority constitutes. They — and many Conservatives — believe Mulcair would make it easier to break up the country.
(Photo: Michelle Siu/Canadian Press)
Mulcair’s people have been waiting for the attack. They know they are vulnerable on that front, especially with several NDP MPs in Quebec who were previous supporters of, or donors to, separatist parties and candidates. In his autobiography, Strength of Conviction, Mulcair says he believes 50 per cent plus one is necessary to tell Quebecers that another referendum — with a clear question — would really mean the breakup of the country. It wouldn’t be a vote to send a message to Ottawa, as the 1995 referendum vote was viewed. Fifty per cent plus one is also the democratic thing to do, Mulcair writes. Randomly insisting on a margin of 60 or 65 per cent – only if the Yes side won – would be “not only unrealistic and dishonest but demonstrably unfair and disrespectful of people’s democratic rights,” he says. “You can’t respect the democratic process only when it suits you.”
At the same time, though, Chambers, Mulcair’s advisor, said the No side knows the Yes side cheated. In his book, Mulcair talks about how in his riding, a heavily multicultural and federal riding of Chomedey, 5,426 ballots were rejected by government scrutineers.
When asked about it, Chambers said the NDP’s strategy on national unity is to “try to heal the wounds.” The NDP wants to be a uniting force that shows to Quebecers that they can thrive in a united Canada. Having a significant number of MPs from Quebec reinforces that, he said.
“There is no other reason to raise this issue in this election except for this tactical advantage that the Liberals think that they might be able to get in Southern Ontario by calling us a bogey man. It’s just not going to work.” Another Mulcair advisor called the Liberals’ strategy “dangerous” for national unity. Over on the Tory side, campaigners are waiting for Mulcair to lob an attack against them on ethics and accountability.
Online, the NDP has gone after Harper for his 59 Senate appointments, including Mike Duffy, Pamela Wallin and Patrick Brazeau, not to mention numerous election violations involving Tory staffers, organizers and ministers — including one that led to a jail term for Harper’s own parliamentary secretary, Dean Del Mastro.
“They want to put a pinprick in the NDP balloon,” Powers said.
The NDP act holier than thou, but they themselves have some questionable history, he said.
In the weeks ahead, voters can expect to hear more about the NDP’s satellite office scheme and the party’s refusal to pay back $2.7 million it is accused of inappropriately funnelling from the House of Commons.
Mulcair will come under attack as yet just another opportunistic “career politician” who flirted with the Tories before agreeing to run for the NDP and who, as a senior Quebec politician, said nothing for 17 years about a local mayor offering him a suspected bribe. Mulcair was a rookie politician in Quebec’s national assembly at the time. “Well, he didn’t take accept it, right? He threw it away,” Chambers interjects.
The Mulcair advisor said there are number of a possible attacks that might be directed at the NDP — too risky on the economy, too risky on national security, an opportunistic leader — but they all have the fault of “not being plausible.”
“Tom Mulcair was the president of the law society at McGill, one of the top students and the elected leader of his class. And he was five to six years younger than the average age of his class. He could have gone to any downtown firm for big numbers. And he went to Quebec City to work for the justice department. This guy has never done the opportunistic thing in his life.
“He has had chances to take care of himself in every conceivable way, but he has done the tough, interesting thing that’s been good for society.
“It just doesn’t ring true. I’m his friend and whatever, but I just don’t see how you make the case.”
Outside the airport gate on the way to the leaders’ first debate, which will be held in Toronto on Aug. 6, I stopped to purchase a copy of Mulcair’s autobiography — a book written with his advisors to introduce himself to Canadians and explain all the unexplainable to those who took the time to be interested.
Who will you vote for? I ask the middle-aged cashier.
“This guy, I think,” she responds, pointing to Mulcair’s face on the cover.
“I can’t stand the other two,” she responds. Certainly not Harper, she says with a grimace. Trudeau? “I’ve seen him a couple of times; I haven’t been impressed.
“So maybe it’s time to give this guy a try.”
Apparently, many other Canadians feel the same way too.
Althia Raj is The Huffington Post Canada's Ottawa bureau chief. She can also be heard and seen on CTV's Question Period, CPAC's The Week with Mark Sutcliffe, CBC The National's At Issue panel and CBC radio stations across the country. Follow her on Twitter and Facebook.
Also on HuffPost